DC Tom Posted August 3, 2017 Share Posted August 3, 2017 I just went by this graph. That chart may not be wrong, if it represents actual expenditures as opposed to allocations - which, given that it mentions "stalled" high-speed rail initiatives that were allocated but never fully executed, may very well be the case. Which doesn't disprove my point, either: bitching about the "party of no" blocking infrastructure spending when the spending bill that was passed despite them did almost nothing is a disingenuous and stupid interpretation of the problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted August 3, 2017 Share Posted August 3, 2017 That chart may not be wrong, if it represents actual expenditures as opposed to allocations - which, given that it mentions "stalled" high-speed rail initiatives that were allocated but never fully executed, may very well be the case. Which doesn't disprove my point, either: bitching about the "party of no" blocking infrastructure spending when the spending bill that was passed despite them did almost nothing is a disingenuous and stupid interpretation of the problem. i noticed the high speed rail, as well. The bridge they built on my land and the 4 nearby accounted for $400+ million. Of course, this is over the corridor that is known as the i85 and 77 of the railroad world. The one of two routes north or south this side of the appalachians Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted August 3, 2017 Share Posted August 3, 2017 i didnt reprimand you. I just saod please for the love of all things ignore him. Thanks for the advice but I don't need any advice. Ok? Got it? Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts