LabattBlue Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 If this has been posted and discussed already, I apologize, but I heard on WGR on the way home from work that Wire was inactive for Sundays game. Did not sound like it was related to any injury he had, but I did not hear the full discussion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROCCEO Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 sounds like he's headed for the chopping block. It's too bad, despite his many shortcomings I was always a coy fan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cashfruit Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 i heard him talkin yesterday on the brad riter show, he said he was inactive because they had to carry and extra o-lineman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LabattBlue Posted January 6, 2005 Author Share Posted January 6, 2005 I don't know where to find the info, but was Wire our ST captain? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theNose76 Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 Stamer was ST captain, saw him go out to the coin-toss, didn't realize Wire wasn't dressed. Also noticed that Tim Anderson dressed, think that might have been his first game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cashfruit Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 i thought he was, but somethin tells me it could be crowell or haggan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 Speaking of which....how about Josh Stamer? He looks like a keeper to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#89 Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 Coy is the captain - Stamer did the coin toss because Coy wasn't dressed. I think it must have been a last min thing because I saw Coy's Dad in the fieldhouse and I don't think he would have come if Coy wasn't playing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevewin Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 Another hard pill for the Coy crowd to swallow - more evidence that our boy Coy is just 'decent' and 'replaceable' on STs after all. Or another way to think of it - his liability of not providing competent depth at his defensive position is not overcome by his contributions on STs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LabattBlue Posted January 6, 2005 Author Share Posted January 6, 2005 Another hard pill for the Coy crowd to swallow - more evidence that our boy Coy is just 'decent' and 'replaceable' on STs after all. Or another way to think of it - his liability of not providing competent depth at his defensive position is not overcome by his contributions on STs. 195308[/snapback] Steve...when I posted this thread, I knew you would appreciate it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevewin Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 Steve...when I posted this thread, I knew you would appreciate it! 195458[/snapback] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nobody Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 more evidence that our boy Coy is just 'decent' and 'replaceable' on STs after all. Did you think the STs had a good game against Pitt? I don't think it was one of their better ones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts