bobobonators Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 Landry in the second or third round would be great. or even trade back up into the second if possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justice Posted December 28, 2012 Author Share Posted December 28, 2012 It's been a very long, long, long time since we had a QB. The quarterback is the heart and soul of any team. There aren't any sure things at QB in this draft. That's why I'd be willing to use all 3 picks on one. I'm desperate!! It's a quarterback driven league. To hell with the defense, they'll get better when our offense improves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xsoldier54 Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 I say take Mante Te'o if he is there in the first. Take the best QB available in round 2 and sign a decent veteran free agent QB as well. Cut the current crop of QB's and move on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Since 1972 Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 I am glad you are not GM. If you draft one in the first round you expect him to be your starter. Why draft one on the 2nd and 3rd after that? Those are potential starters too and instead you guarantee you're drafting two backups that will never play and may not even dress. Also instead of developing one guy (which is hard enough to do) You want to develop 3? good luck. Yeah, dumb GM's draft for this ...The smart ones trade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobobonators Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 I say take Mante Te'o if he is there in the first. Take the best QB available in round 2 and sign a decent veteran free agent QB as well. Cut the current crop of QB's and move on. ya, that's the route i'd go as well. I'd take the best defensive player available in the 1st (even if it's a CB), and then go QB in the second round or even 3rd round. i really don't think there's that much of a difference between the "top" 2 QB's and the 3-5 QB's in this draft. I really don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave mcbride Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 If the Bills don't take a QB first - even if the player represents a bit of a gamble - they will prove once and for all that they are the worst organization in the NFL. It's a QB-driven league and the Bills don't have one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wings and Beer Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 Gone are the days that only 1-2 Qbs go in the first round. If you like one of the top 4-5 Qbs coming out, you best grab him in the first round, even if it's a reach. "but the back half of the draft doesn't need Qbs".....and I retort, 'but they sure love trading their picks to the teams that do'. So even if a guy you like, Landry Jones, looks like he's falling...he probably won't make it to our second pick. "But we could trade up for him"....and I retort 'so we need to draft a Qb in the first round'. I am with those that are screaming for LBs, and new coaches, so if a stud backer, hi Notre Dame, does fall to us, I would be thrilled to take him, but you MUST immediately trade back into the first for a QB. In summation, we must get a QB in the first. PS--to my above post....not necessarily saying Jones is one of the top 4-5 QBs in the draft, jut used him as an example since he had already been mentioned. We still have the combine, pro days, and a few games before we can really rank the position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddogblitz Posted December 29, 2012 Share Posted December 29, 2012 If there is a QB you like, you better take him in the 1st or you'll probably lose out. I'm sure there were a lot of teams thinking of taking Locker or Ponder in round 2 or 3 or later and look what happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts