ohioandy Posted September 1, 2011 Share Posted September 1, 2011 Who would you rather have on your team...Jahvid Best or CJ Spiller? Last week's poll results: Paul Posluszny: 13% Nick Barnett: 87% Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CBD Posted September 1, 2011 Share Posted September 1, 2011 Too much injury concern with Best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEra Posted September 1, 2011 Share Posted September 1, 2011 Spiller, and it's not even close. I liked Best in college...then he got a concussion...and then he go another concussion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DreReed83 Posted September 1, 2011 Share Posted September 1, 2011 Spiller, and it's not even close. I liked Best in college...then he got a concussion...and then he go another concussion. And yet Best outgained Spiller from scrimmage by over 600 yds. Hmmm. Best over Spiller and it's not even close. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maddog69 Posted September 1, 2011 Share Posted September 1, 2011 Best is 1000x better player but the repeated concussions scare me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted September 1, 2011 Share Posted September 1, 2011 And yet Best outgained Spiller from scrimmage by over 600 yds. Hmmm. Best over Spiller and it's not even close. You do realize that we have a 1000 yard rusher on the team with Spiller right? And that Best is the main back? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maddog69 Posted September 1, 2011 Share Posted September 1, 2011 You do realize that we have a 1000 yard rusher on the team with Spiller right? And that Best is the main back? You do realize that Gailey handed the starting job to Spiller but he could not handle it, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DreReed83 Posted September 1, 2011 Share Posted September 1, 2011 (edited) You do realize that we have a 1000 yard rusher on the team with Spiller right? And that Best is the main back? And the fact that a RB taken in the top 10 can't unseat an undrafted RB from Coe College makes it even more pathetic. Thanks for making another case for me. A half healthy Best is better than a fully healthy Spiller. And that's pathetic. Edited September 1, 2011 by DreReed83 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEra Posted September 1, 2011 Share Posted September 1, 2011 And the fact that a RB taken in the top 10 can't unseat an undrafted RB from Coe College makes it even more pathetic. Thanks for making another case for me. That proves the point that best is better? Yeah.... Makes sense. If Best was in buffalo, he'd be sitting on the bench too. Fred is better than both guys. Best would be better off on the bench behind Freddy, that way maybe a couple years of no contact will help his head heal. He's a midget back with concussion injuries.... And you'd rather have him. Thanks for proving my point. You're a troll. You do realize that Gailey handed the starting job to Spiller but he could not handle it, right? Actually, they handed it to lynch so they could trade him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DreReed83 Posted September 1, 2011 Share Posted September 1, 2011 (edited) That proves the point that best is better? Yeah.... Makes sense. If Best was in buffalo, he'd be sitting on the bench too. Fred is better than both guys. Best would be better off on the bench behind Freddy, that way maybe a couple years of no contact will help his head heal. He's a midget back with concussion injuries.... And you'd rather have him. Thanks for proving my point. You're a troll. Actually, they handed it to lynch so they could trade him. Yea yea yea. If this, if that, if this, blah blah blah blah blah. This is all I'm hearing. If Best was drafted by the Bills, he would probably have done better than 400 yds from scimmage. So continue on with your "IF's" blah blah blah. The fact of the matter is Best was on the field while Spiller couldn't even get on the field. He gained over 1000 yds injured. That tells me what kinda player Best is. Spiller? He's not even a quarter of what Best is. And it shows on the field. Or in Spillers case on the bench. You dont think Spiller was givin a fair chance at the starting spot after being drafted in the top 10? Lay down the crack pipe. Edited September 1, 2011 by DreReed83 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PDaDdy Posted September 1, 2011 Share Posted September 1, 2011 And yet Best outgained Spiller from scrimmage by over 600 yds. Hmmm. Best over Spiller and it's not even close. And yet Best didn't have to displace Fred Jackson to get a starting job Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DreReed83 Posted September 1, 2011 Share Posted September 1, 2011 And yet Best didn't have to displace Fred Jackson to get a starting job Read my post above junior. Any RB that is taken in the top 10 should be able to get on the field more than Spiller did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted September 1, 2011 Share Posted September 1, 2011 You do realize that Gailey handed the starting job to Spiller but he could not handle it, right? The revisionist history here to support pathetic opinions is just amazing...... At NO POINT was Spiller EVER handed the starting job in any year he has been with the team.....it was never said.....it never happened....stop making **** up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BiggieScooby Posted September 1, 2011 Share Posted September 1, 2011 Spiller if he can figure out how to slow down and follow his blocks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEra Posted September 1, 2011 Share Posted September 1, 2011 Yea yea yea. If this, if that, if this, blah blah blah blah blah. This is all I'm hearing. If Best was drafted by the Bills, he would probably have done better than 400 yds from scimmage. So continue on with your "IF's" blah blah blah. The fact of the matter is Best was on the field while Spiller couldn't even get on the field. He gained over 1000 yds injured. That tells me what kinda player Best is. Spiller? He's not even a quarter of what Best is. And it shows on the field. Or in Spillers case on the bench. You dont think Spiller was givin a fair chance at the starting spot after being drafted in the top 10? Lay down the crack pipe. That's what I get for arguing with a troll. A bunch of bs. Btw, Alex Smith had more passing yards in his first year than Aaron Rodgers had in his first 3. You're talking about 2 players that play the same position and were drafted in the same year, and are using one year as the basis for who the better player is. Sounds like something you would do. You would take a concussion riddled midget back over a healthy player sitting behind a better player. Best competed with Kevin Smith. Yeah, the same Kevin Smith who is currently w/o a team. Remember Shawn Bryson? He was once our starting RB. Why? Because he was competing against Jonathan Linton. You're comparing apples and oranges. If you don't take each players depth chart into consideration, you're not correctly evaluating the talent. "spiller is 1/4 as good as best"....lol. Typical Dre. Clueless. Go back to your cave troll. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted September 1, 2011 Share Posted September 1, 2011 And the fact that a RB taken in the top 10 can't unseat an undrafted RB from Coe College makes it even more pathetic. Thanks for making another case for me. A half healthy Best is better than a fully healthy Spiller. And that's pathetic. Actually....I find your posts to be beyond pathetic and almost borderline on trolling....at no point have you ever made a case about anything you are just a venom spewer on this board. When teams draft.....bring in free agents......bring in undrafted guys.....however they are brought in....draft status and where they came from go completely out the window. I present to you that Jackson could be a starting running back on several teams in the league and has outplayed EVERY running back that we have brought in to compete with him....instead of bitching about Spiller commend Fred for being the player he is. They are totally different players anyway....and Spiller is going to prove his worth this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEra Posted September 1, 2011 Share Posted September 1, 2011 (edited) Actually....I find your posts to be beyond pathetic and almost borderline on trolling....at no point have you ever made a case about anything you are just a venom spewer on this board. When teams draft.....bring in free agents......bring in undrafted guys.....however they are brought in....draft status and where they came from go completely out the window. I present to you that Jackson could be a starting running back on several teams in the league and has outplayed EVERY running back that we have brought in to compete with him....instead of bitching about Spiller commend Fred for being the player he is. They are totally different players anyway....and Spiller is going to prove his worth this year. Borderline trolling? Come on John, he's been trolling over a year now. Nothing borderline about it. Edited September 1, 2011 by NewEra Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maddog69 Posted September 1, 2011 Share Posted September 1, 2011 (edited) The revisionist history here to support pathetic opinions is just amazing...... At NO POINT was Spiller EVER handed the starting job in any year he has been with the team.....it was never said.....it never happened....stop making **** up I know. But don't be too hard on yourself. http://bleacherreport.com/articles/455843-cj-spiller-shockingly-named-starting-running-back-over-two-veterans Spiller was named the starter for opening day last year. Edited September 1, 2011 by Maddog69 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DreReed83 Posted September 1, 2011 Share Posted September 1, 2011 Borderline trolling? Come on John, he's been trolling for years. Nothing borderline about it. FYI. 1 year is singular. Not plural. I didn't know that I've been trolling on this board longer than I've been a member. How is that possible? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEra Posted September 1, 2011 Share Posted September 1, 2011 FYI. 1 year is singular. Not plural. I didn't know that I've been trolling on this board longer than I've been a member. How is that possible? You've been trolling for over a year. Fixed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts