ChevyVanMiller Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 Gives Bills and "A" on Spiller. Gives Broncos an "F" for Tebow. Day 1 Recap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SawchukBills Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 Gives Bills and "A" on Spiller. Gives Broncos an "F" for Tebow. Day 1 Recap I agree with both grades... pending a Lynch trade...haha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChevyVanMiller Posted April 23, 2010 Author Share Posted April 23, 2010 I agree with both grades... pending a Lynch trade...haha It would seem a Lynch trade is coming, despite the statements from Nix to the contrary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steely Dan Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 They were really going hard for Tebow, it's been said by two sources, and now he's gone. Does that mean that LeFevour (Tebow light as some call him.) is now on the radar? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hossage Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 Clevelands pick of a corner who runs a 4.6 in the 40 was the worst im my opinion. I ran that when i was 16. I like lefevour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max997 Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 I think the Bills will trade Lynch but I dont have a problem if they decide to keep him. I hated the idea of only having two RBs on the roster the last few years. The Bills dont have to trade him and there is nothing with having a former 1000 rusher as an insurance policy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max997 Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 Clevelands pick of a corner who runs a 4.6 in the 40 was the worst im my opinion. I ran that when i was 16. I like lefevour. I didnt like the pick either but I believe i heard someone say he is faster then that and had an issue when he ran that I personally dont like the idea of taking a CB at the top of the draft unless you are getting someone like Champ Bailey or Deoin Sanders...CB is the easiest position to fill on a football team the Jets got a CB at the end of the first round that many had rated just as high Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingfish Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 When Seattle was on the clock Gruden said Spiller was far and way the most talented player in the draft and that he would be a teams "prized possession" when all is said and done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wagon Circler Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 All the analysts love Spiller. I'm not sure he's the right pick for us. But I'll reserve judgment and wait on what they do tomorrow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastRochBillsfan Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 hey Rfeyman, I think you can now cross off your #2 pic too at the bottom of your post! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonyjustbcuz Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 Gives Bills and "A" on Spiller. Gives Broncos an "F" for Tebow. Day 1 Recap I think they should've traded down in the 1st round for a extra pick or two and picked up B. Bulaga OT. I will know better how I feel tomorrow when the Bills pick again! I just prefer we address our needs before going after the luxury of having a third starting quality RB. If Lynch gets traded tomorrow in a package that helps us land Clausen at QB then the pick makes sense and the end will justify the means!! Don't forget our QB, OLT, NT, & WR........I'm afraid according to Bills logic that means we need to draft: a Cornerback a Punter another RB another undersized DE etc......because they are the best available players that remain on the board! (hOPE nOT ! ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leonidas Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 Gives Bills and "A" on Spiller. Gives Broncos an "F" for Tebow. Day 1 Recap Not everyone agrees. Fanhouse gives us a D+, gives Denver an A-. http://nfl.fanhouse.com/2010/04/23/2010-nf...round-1/?synd=1 Ditto for these guys: http://neoonion.com/nfl-draft-2010-grades-...sults/53438.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarolinaBill Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 Not everyone agrees. Fanhouse gives us a D+, gives Denver an A-. http://nfl.fanhouse.com/2010/04/23/2010-nf...round-1/?synd=1 Ditto for these guys: http://neoonion.com/nfl-draft-2010-grades-...sults/53438.htm Im sorry but jackson is far from a solid #1, he has no speed and cannot find the endzone, it was a friggin miracle that he got 1000 yds last yr. 237 carries < These are not elite numbers, there barely above average, spiller was a great pick, sorry, but 1062 yds < prisco got this pick right, we need a playmaker 2 tds < Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marauderswr80 Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 Not everyone agrees. Fanhouse gives us a D+, gives Denver an A-. http://nfl.fanhouse.com/2010/04/23/2010-nf...round-1/?synd=1 Ditto for these guys: http://neoonion.com/nfl-draft-2010-grades-...sults/53438.htm i dont mind the spiller pick i mean whats wrong with a little excitment with the offense? i can tell u this the front office needs to address the qb spot and the ol and dl. i also think we keep lynch as insurance stop and think what if someones rb goes down early training camp and preseason? all of a sudden a team can panic and we get more out of them draft pick wise....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leonidas Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 Im sorry but jackson is far from a solid #1, he has no speed and cannot find the endzone, it was a friggin miracle that he got 1000 yds last yr. 237 carries < These are not elite numbers, there barely above average, spiller was a great pick, sorry, but 1062 yds < prisco got this pick right, we need a playmaker 2 tds < That's why we drafted Lynch 12th overall three years ago. Yet we continue to spin our wheels. I guess Prisco got this right 'cause he agrees with you. You should let those other guys know they're wrong for the same reason. i dont mind the spiller pick i mean whats wrong with a little excitment with the offense? i can tell u this the front office needs to address the qb spot and the ol and dl. i also think we keep lynch as insurance stop and think what if someones rb goes down early training camp and preseason? all of a sudden a team can panic and we get more out of them draft pick wise....... Does anybody remember the cluster!@#$ it was having McGahee and Henry on the same team in 2004? Now we've got Jackson, Lynch, and Spiller. Super. Nobody's saying having "a little excitement" is a problem. But it comes at the price of upgrading areas of our team that need to be addressed, including OT, NT, OLB, and QB. I'm fine with letting OT and QB go until the later rounds, but why not upgrade OLB? I was liking our depth at ILB (Poz, Mitchell, Davis), but now Mitchell likely moves to the outside and Maybin gets to show what he's made of. This is all assuming we address OT and NT tomorrow night, of course, which we need to do. But couldn't we have grabbed Dexter McCluster in the third as our scatback? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarolinaBill Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 That's why we drafted Lynch 12th overall three years ago. Yet we continue to spin our wheels. I guess Prisco got this right 'cause he agrees with you. You should let those other guys know they're wrong for the same reason. Does anybody remember the cluster!@#$ it was having McGahee and Henry on the same team in 2004? Now we've got Jackson, Lynch, and Spiller. Super. Nobody's saying having "a little excitement" is a problem. But it comes at the price of upgrading areas of our team that need to be addressed, including OT, NT, OLB, and QB. I'm fine with letting OT and QB go until the later rounds, but why not upgrade OLB? I was liking our depth at ILB (Poz, Mitchell, Davis), but now Mitchell likely moves to the outside and Maybin gets to show what he's made of. This is all assuming we address OT and NT tomorrow night, of course, which we need to do. But couldn't we have grabbed Dexter McCluster in the third as our scatback? no buddy, your references to the guys who think it was a bad pick, they cited jackson as a solid #1 rb, which he is not. Lynch is not mentioned, they say jackson is a good #1 so we dont need spiller, and thats not right. Like I said, Prisco got this one right, we need a playmaker, and now we got one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steely Dan Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 Clevelands pick of a corner who runs a 4.6 in the 40 was the worst im my opinion. I ran that when i was 16. I like lefevour. TSN's War Room has him timed at 4.46. It was probably just a one off bad time. hey Rfeyman, I think you can now cross off your #2 pic too at the bottom of your post! Not until I know who I have to replace it with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts