stevestojan Posted November 28, 2004 Share Posted November 28, 2004 Well, I am not watching, and the stats aren't good for Drew (of course), but one thing I have ripped on him for is focusing on Moulds. Well, today, he has found: Evans, Moulds, McGahee, Shelton, Campbell, Aiken, Fast Freddy, Euhus, and Henry. so far... Wow - nice work Drew. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crackur Posted November 28, 2004 Share Posted November 28, 2004 Looks good over the last cple of weeks.......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted November 28, 2004 Share Posted November 28, 2004 You forgot Hamlin and Lucas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayzer32 Posted November 28, 2004 Share Posted November 28, 2004 You forgot Hamlin and Lucas 136149[/snapback] That's right. He has actually found 11 different recievers. What an accomplishment. And Hamlin has two receptions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Posted November 28, 2004 Share Posted November 28, 2004 3 terrible balls, but overall a good performance for Drew. For those who criticized Donahoe for picking McGahee do you want to retract your statements? 4 TDs today. When was the last time we had a back score 4 TDs? And on the road!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kota Posted November 29, 2004 Share Posted November 29, 2004 The 3 picks are no big deal really. The Bills have been in the redzone alot today and it was done on the arm of Drew Bledsoe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fezmid Posted November 29, 2004 Share Posted November 29, 2004 Well, I am not watching, and the stats aren't good for Drew (of course) 25/37, 275yds, 1TD, 3INTs Aside from the three INTs (one of which was a very good defensive play, one of which was a good defensive play and bad throw, and one which was a terrible throw), he's been on fire. The WM TD "run" on 4th and 1 was 80% Drew's fake and lateral. People complain when he plays mistake free and "oinly" throws 150 yards, but throw for nearly 300 yards and he's still playing poor? EDIT: Since everyone's been beating on Bledsoe's QB rating as proof that he's washed up, his rating for today is 134.6 (http://www.footballguys.com/qbrating.htm). How is that bad? CW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MRW Posted November 29, 2004 Share Posted November 29, 2004 25/37, 275yds, 1TD, 3INTs Aside from the three INTs (one of which was a very good defensive play, one of which was a good defensive play and bad throw, and one which was a terrible throw), he's been on fire. The WM TD "run" on 4th and 1 was 80% Drew's fake and lateral. People complain when he plays mistake free and "oinly" throws 150 yards, but throw for nearly 300 yards and he's still playing poor? EDIT: Since everyone's been beating on Bledsoe's QB rating as proof that he's washed up, his rating for today is 134.6 (http://www.footballguys.com/qbrating.htm). How is that bad? CW 136283[/snapback] Wow, that calculator is way way off. I started playing around with the numbers and put in 8/19, 100 yds., 0 td, 3 int and it came up with 95.8. Just guessing, but I don't think that's correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Last Guy on the Bench Posted November 29, 2004 Share Posted November 29, 2004 Wow, that calculator is way way off. I started playing around with the numbers and put in 8/19, 100 yds., 0 td, 3 int and it came up with 95.8. Just guessing, but I don't think that's correct. 136553[/snapback] See my post below. You're entering the attempts and completions backwards. Attempts go first, then completions. The resulting ratings seem much more believable (e.g., Drew's 65 today). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MRW Posted November 29, 2004 Share Posted November 29, 2004 See my post below. You're entering the attempts and completions backwards. Attempts go first, then completions. The resulting ratings seem much more believable (e.g., Drew's 65 today). 136560[/snapback] Stupid counterintuitive calculator! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts