Niagara Bill
-
Posts
2,702 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Niagara Bill
-
-
So now China has violated the trade agreement....according to truth social poster trump.
How can anyone see the world through this lens. 145% tariffs, 50% on steel and China violated the trade agreement. Hilarious. Trump is becoming the Henny Youngman of politics.
So now all trumps buddies hit the markets, make money on the downside and then again when he speaks on the upside. Such maneuvers are so obvious. So sic.
-
8 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:
Again, though, the Prez and admin who tried to put the opposition in prison was Biden/Harris. That ship sailed, sir, but thankfully enough Americans with common sense course corrected.
Explain?
-
-
-
19 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:
At least two of those. Good lord. By what vehicle do you think the Nov 2026 elections would be cancelled? Trumpian decree? This is so embarrassing. You seem like a frightened old man.
Please remember to come back in Nov 26 and 28 and fess up to your ridiculous thoughts. Maybe meet me at the polling station. You can hand out water.
Frightened, no. Maybe you should read the small print in the big beautiful bill.
Nov 26 is on jeopardy. War against NATO because of Greenland and Canada is real. Trade with Russia is close..
I want to be wrong, but I am not. Watch this trade judicial thing. By next week those judges will be household names, ridiculed , threatened. There is no organization left in government to stop him....no impeachment, no arrest capability, no judge, no congress, no rule of law.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, JDHillFan said:
I’ve heard that the bad orange man is an existential threat to democracy. When does that start? It seems like every branch of government is going full speed ahead. Keep me posted with your delusions if you don’t mind.
And what will it take to open your eyes. Elimination of the federal trade court?
Cancelation of Nov 26 elections, arrest of political foe, trade deal with Russia, annexation if Greenland or Canada? Or will you always be blind?
-
7 hours ago, JDHillFan said:
How does someone your age, ostensibly a man, become so over the top dramatic? Truly embarrassing.
How does a man, presumably, become such a cult member, unable or unwilling to see the obvious direction of this administration..
Will he go that far, try to cancel elections, create emergency powers to maintain or grasp full control. Will he just continue on pissing off the rest of the world and then retreat to play golf.
-
1
-
-
5 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:
that justifies destroying democracy? perhaps we should vote on that. And we will nov 26 if trump doesn't cancel elections.
Read his big beautiful bill Nov 26 is done, toast, fini, hosta la Vista, Roger,over and out.
1 hour ago, Doc Brown said:I could try to deflect but you're right. We've gotten to the point where we've become reliant on the courts to strike down unconstitutional executive orders so why should we expect either side to not test the boundaries. @Big Blitz post from above proves your point where he unknowingly pushing for more power to the executive branch because it means a victory for his side.
It was my idiotic assumption that maybe the party that traditionally views the role that the federal government should be limited (Republican party). That goes for little intervention in the free market, a strong national defense, a strong checks and balance system, the promotion of federalism, and protecting the basic liberties and rights of all legal citizens of this country. I guess the true conservatives have been hijacked by a party where if you speak out against executive overreach when a Republican is in office you're shunned. It really shouldn't be that way but here we are.
The courts have been asked to step in to the political debate for 2 reasons.
1. Court appointees have become far far far too political
2. You have polarized politics like never before.
The only moderation comes from the courts. Political parties no longer govern for the total population.
-
1
-
1
-
-
15 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:
It is a democracy. The president was elected by the voters winning the required electoral votes and also the popular vote. And unlike other "democracies" no candidate was disqualified like in Romania nor was any party outlawed like they're looking to do in Germany because the ruling powers were threatened so they resort to restricting the options presented to the voters to retain power. Or punish free speech like the UK.
So our democracy works pretty well. Anyone looking for potential dictatorships should cast their gaze to Europe.
At this point in history you are 100% correct. And I hope you always are.
But, the direction has been strange and concerning.
I just mention, that this point and ruling could be very telling.
There is no way of ignoring the administrations criticism of the judiciary to this point.
At the very least, the administration will have to openly prove the extreme need for emergency measures against the entire world.
The checks and balances that have made the US the envy of the world are about to be tested. Here's hoping they stay in place.
-
1
-
-
Just now, Big Blitz said:
Imagine siding with China
I hope you are not insulted, but you do realize that everyone knows you are a paid schill...and no one pays any attention to the reams of info you copy and paste.
-
1
-
-
This may be the test, democracy vs dictatorship. Will federal agencies follow the rule of law and the courts or the actions of the administration.
The world awaits the outcome.
-
1
-
-
7 hours ago, Doc said:
So more of the “he’s going to start WWIII, trust me.” OK, we’ll wait and see.
After the last 4 years, I don’t want to hear about lying….More than 1 politician can be wrong. Actions of Biden and the dems does not give permission to Trump to be a liar.
-
1
-
-
-
4 hours ago, Doc said:
Trump wasn't even close to the first. You'd be surprised to learn who first started birtherism.
And I have no doubt that Obama claimed to have been born in Kenya on college applications and such. But was actually born in Hawaii. Not that I would have cared if he had been born in Kenya because his mother was an American citizen.
The issue is not Obama, nor birtherism, nor fake news, it is the continuing trump lies, from day 1.
-
1
-
-
4 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:
This is actually fake news, NB, and unless you believe in what the Frenchy's call "Le lapin de Pâques", pretty darn gullible.
But it was trump who said it
-
On 5/21/2025 at 6:50 PM, Andy1 said:
If Obama had accepted that jet from Quatar, republicans would have gone ape s@#t bonkers and claimed it as proof he is a traitor and not American. They would demand impeachment. Trump does it and his flock of sheep are silent.
Was Obama even born in the US? 🤣
This was the actual beginning of fake news.
9 hours ago, Doc said:He doesn't get to "keep" it and there is no bribe.
Oh doc, did you just say that with a straight face.
-
2
-
-
14 minutes ago, Homelander said:
This is what all dictators do. Have you ever seen a poor dictator.
-
Well, if ever American citizens needed proof that their President is a complete liar...they have it.
trump....FU
-
1
-
1
-
-
49 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:
It's hard to reconcile that with Trump. It really is. The guy is all over the map, but it's hard to argue that he has much in the way of libertarianism going for him. I'll step away now.
Not all his policies are bad, it is his threats, his ignorant coments, his constant insults, his narcissistic actions. Attacking Harvard vs his own rediculous school is a great example.
I detest woke, it is as dangerous as fascism. But woke does not threaten democracy.
I to will step away.
-
1
-
-
9 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:
Ah, ok. Of course, the pardon is part of the system, too, when properly applied.
As you mentioned kindness and mind-ness when realcting by the administration into the justice system for political reason is not blindness.
Too many times pardons are so political, by both parties
-
30 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:
I would not advocate for a pardon for Chauvin.
Still, what you’re suggesting is that the current admin should do the right thing when the prior administration did not. It’s pretty common for people supporting the new admin to suggest “You first”.
No, I am advocating that administrations should not have influence on judicial decisions. Chauvin like others has appeal processes.
-
39 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:
Yes please. More. This will definitely work out well.......for Republicans.
😂
Is that Hoss Cartright's son?
-
1 hour ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:
I agree the decisions GF made that day were part of the problem, and of all the issues that day, his fentanyl use is the biggest issue I have with the question of what actually killed him. I also see a tremendous downside to being on the jury and voting to acquit—angry mobs would be a problem. I can certainly understand a person looking at the video, the prosecution case—and thinking it’s a whole lot easier to convict the guy than deal with the fallout from acquittal.
Whether Chauvin or OJ, the justice system made a decision, to reverse that is like the woke left demanding Columbus Statue be removed for judging him under different times, it is plain wrong. Because weak Biden allowed such nonsense to occur is no reason to continue that type of lunacy.
-
1
-
-
39 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:
i guess trump failed to mention that the golden dome doesn't work without Canada. Would be helpful if they didn''t hate us. no so easy to be isolationist...
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/05/23/trump-canada-golden-dome-00366410
Frankly, it would give him these two simultaneous actions,
1. We need Canada as 51 and use more than economic pressure
2. Emergency actions, emergency powers (if fentanyl is a good excuse then war is better) to postpone 2026 election cycle.
He has purposely been harming friends and NATO economically, and helping dictators. Within a month of today, he will be offering trade deals with Russia to help with cease fire..then you will know his true intentions.
-
1
-



The hidden coup in Trump’s Tax Bill - Section 70302
in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Posted
If not, then what would be the purpose of the clause.
Deflection from the issue is always a trait of someone who has a devious agenda.