Bungee Jumper

Between the ears...

Do I need to drill holes in my skull first, or is hitting myself in the head with a hammer sufficient?

Moorman is having a phenomenal year. I can't remember seeing a punter pin so many punts out of bounds inside the 20.

Didn't know you were a fan of Thomas...

You going to beat on daquixers all day? It's almost as entertaining as the game.

Am I the only one happy to see Thomas get a chance?

Why don't you, instead, explain WHY the government's job is to take care of us. Start with a Constitutional basis...

So why the hell is the Democratic platform to withdraw from Iraq and not increase our presence?

There's the crux of your idiocy right there.

What, you think the trial was a legitimate exercise of justice? It wasn't...according to one of the US prosecutors as of about a year ago. I'm fine with the result...I just wish they would call it what it is: a revenge killing, not justice.

Just because they hid them better. If you want to use civilian casualties as the measure...probably 40k/year "excess deaths" now, versus 50k-70k under Saddam. It's probably "better" now. Personally, I think that's a stupid measure. If you measure it by the psychological impact of the risk of being killed in the street now versus being grabbed off the street and killed in a dungeon under Saddam...probably about equal.

None at all. Seriously. I know one of the prosecutors. Works at the USDOJ. This whole kangaroo court was staged to justify the preordained end of executing Saddam. The trial was a waste of time. They should have just killed him. Instead, they put on a show making a mockery of the very principle of "justice" to falsely justify a preordained outcome that didn't need any justification to begin with. Ridiculous.

But...but...but...that's different! We're allowed to make fun of people in wheelchairs. Darin's, though, is tasteless, because we're not allowed to make fun of the mentally retarded. Just like we're not allowed to make fun of Hitler. Is anyone writing these rules down? They get so confusing at times.

Maybe if we pay liberals to have more kids, the human race will get smarter...

Committing myself to a definition of heritability? There is only one definition, and I'm committed to it. You're the one that keeps changing it to mean "inheritability", if and when it suits you. Likewise "error" and "regression towards the mean". You consistently lie, cheat, and manipulate to try to get your way; you're just upset now that you're being called out on it by a number of people who know far more about it than you. And like I said before, I've been very clear about my disagreement with your nonsense. You're the only one that's expressed any confusion. Why do you think that is?

No one else seems to have a problem understanding what I'm saying. Just you. So the problem must be me.

Holy sh--, you're an idiot. You haven't paid any attention to anything anyone's said.l

I don't know, but I'm pretty sure it'll be preceded by Jessica Simpson reading a book.

And your avatar?

Well, of course. It was about their voting machines.

Yeah, sure. By the way...do you deny beating your wife and kids?

Note to Holcomb's Arm: the above DOES NOT PROVE YOUR POINT!!! It's anecdotal, not scientific. Don't use it as a supporting argument.

My support is a couple centuries of math, physics, and biology research establishing the fields of statistics and genetics. You actually want me to quote an article that says regression toward the mean isn't error? There is none...because it's understood. If you want a source for the difference between heritability and inheritability...start with Merriam-!@#$ing-Webster, you loon. In fact, your own sources contradict you. I know. I've read them. They don't say what you think they say. You simply don't know how to read them. That's because you haven't done the math. Do. The. Math. Do it properly, using a gaussian distribution for the means instead of discrete values. You'll find the equation indicates the exact opposite of what you think it indicates.

So I'm no longer a Republican? I'm so confused...

"Sick individual"? I haven't been paying that close attention to the story...what'd he do?