Jump to content

mannc

Community Member
  • Posts

    18,641
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by mannc

  1. they're not good enough to go to the playoffs

    You're stating that as a fact? They were in the mix for the playoffs last year with a historically incompetent HC and had a street free agent at WR1 part of the year due to injuries. They add a healthy Lawson, Ragland, get a healthy Sammy back in his contract year, and add what look to be three nice pieces in the draft...but you state unequivocally that they are "not good enough to make the playoffs" (i.e., go 9-7 or 10-6)? Why do you even bother?

    starting the season 0-2 in both the division and the conference never bodes well for playoffs. seems like that scenario will play out yet again this year.

    What? Have you even bothered to look at the schedule? The Bills will probably be 6 point favorites v the Jets at home to open the season. Carolina isn't in the Bills' conference, much less their division, and they stunk last year.
  2. How the f**k did you get that out of what I wrote? The Ryan's were a freaking train wreck. I have high hopes for McD & Co., but they're looking longterm, they aren't trying to maximize wins in 2017. I'm good with that, but I'm not going to pretend it's something it's not.

    I don't believe for a second that they "aren't trying to maximize wins in 2017". There is zero evidence of that, and if they aren't tying to maximize wins in 2017 (at least at this point) then everyone should be fired. They were in the mix for a playoff spot last year with the worst HC in the league. If McD is only average, it would result in another two wins right there. Tanking is not part of the plan, nor should it be. Now, if they start 1-7....
  3. To be truthful they filled them with guys that have potential to fill the roles but have not yet shown they can

     

    Cycling in draft picks for proven vets can be great, or a major flop

    This is no different from most teams: they lose guys every year and they try to fill in the holes via FA, the draft and with young players already on the roster. Nothing to see here.
  4. Other than the inclusion of the Bills as the 5th team, what other part of that article do you disagree with? The first part was spot on (including the Polian tanking stuff) and the first four teams on the list make a ton of sense. He probably picked the Bills as the fifth because the new regime kicked the can down the road this offseason. The Bills probably won't be top 5 bad, but they won't be above .500 good in 2017 either.

    So you think they'll miss the Ryan brothers?
  5. Tanking is not part of the plan. There is no reason this team can't compete for a playoff spot. The subtraction of the Ryan clowns alone is worth at least two wins. More importantly, McD is a new coach and he needs to immediately establish credibility and respect with the players. That's done by winning, not by tanking. He can't afford to go 2-14 or 3-13 and the vets on the team won't stand for it.

  6. Reid is NOT a short term "win now" coach. He is safe in KC for the long term. I just cannot believe a Reid team would trade up that big for a QB unless it was HIS guy. Everything about Andy Reid tells me he is the kind of guy who would walk out should that happen. He would coast into another job no problem.

    Except that he's under contract. But I agree that it's unlikely the team went against Reid's wishes in trading up for Mahomes.
  7. I don't disagree with this, and I haven't looked up anyone else you listed, but I do think it's important to remember that Tyrod contributes ~40 yards per game on the ground. In his 2 years here he is averaging 248.6 yards and 1.62 TDs per game, which is pretty close to your initial numbers. I guess my question is are you expecting those passing number in addition to his current running numbers? Or do you just want to see his rushing stats essentially converted to passing stats?

    Excellent question. Here's another one: Would you still want those those additional 40 or so yards/game passing if it also meant that Tyrod would throw as many additional interceptions as those quarterbacks throw?

  8.  

    It's a scale so he falls between the two in certain areas. Mariota and Wentz being the different ends of the spectrum. I'm also guessing that height/weight wise, Allen is bang in the middle of the two.

     

    Athleticism also goes beyond the stopwatch, it also impacts stylistic approach.

    Thanks. That makes sense.
  9. . Athletically, he's on the Mariota/Wentz scale. Some similar ball security issues to those guys as well.

    Wait, not to change the subject, but did you just compare Wentz's athleticism to Marcus Mariota's? The only valid comparison with Mariota in that category is probably Tyrod Taylor.
  10. Tyrod over Eli Manning is ridiculous.

    Well, it's like comparing Tyrod to Rivers. Manning's has certainly had a better career than Tyrod, but he's also been in the league a lot longer so it's not really a fair comparison. Manning's comparative stats over the past two years aren't significantly better than Tyrod's.

     

    It's interesting that the Tyrod haters often say that Tyrod is what he is, and that he won't/can't improve. But Eli didn't become an above-average NFL QB until his sixth year as a starter.

  11. This alone does not prove someone is accurate or even inaccurate for that matter.

     

    EJ had a 68% completion percentage in college. A number like that would indicate a highly accurate QB. Would you say that's a fair assessment of EJ?

     

    The eye test plays a large role here.

    I agree that those numbers don't prove Cardale is accurate. My point is that he has yet to see any meaningful playing time in the pros, and to this point, there is no basis for calling him inaccurate. I'm not saying Cardale is going to be a superstar, but let's just see how he does when he's given a chance to play before we say he sucks.

     

    The "eye test" is pretty worthless, BTW. People are too easily thrown off by biases and pre-conceived notions.

  12. You can have all the tools in the world and be a physical specimen. But for a qb if you are inaccurate it is a fatal flaw that can't be overcome. The windows in the NFL are so tight and timing and rhythm throws are required at a much higher level compared to the pro game. In college you can throw to receivers but in the pros you have to make more throws to tight spots. I just don't see him taking that leap.

     

    There is no doubt that he has a canon arm. But that isn't going to get you very far without good accuracy. Cardale is a good kid and he is a smart kid. The description of him not being smart is an unfair stereotype due mainly because of his imposing physical size and playful personality.

    John, what evidence do you have that Cardale is inaccurate? That proposition is not supported by his college stats.
  13. ...read articles about it ......NO benefit to me or ANYONE to fabricate such claims...yet Google yields nothing other than an NFL scout calling him a "poor man's Jamarcus Russell".....BTW, LAST thing I would do is root against any kid trying to fulfill is lifelong NFL dream.........

    I think you are making stuff up. I just did a google search for reports on Cardale's scout team performance. This is all I found, from December 12 last year:

     

    "Hes what you want waiting on the runway, Bills offensive coordinator Anthony Lynn said, insinuating that having a player of his caliber as a developmental quarterback that youre waiting on is the ideal scenario.

     

    He's working hard. I mean, hes a gunslinger, strong arm. We watch him in scout team, evaluate his reps in scout team hes putting the ball in the right places, hes accurate. I think his development is coming along fine."

     

    Doesn't exactly support your narrative, does it?

  14. Inaccurate QB's don't succeed in the NFL. The big arm doesn't matter. That isn't a "gut feeling" it's what I see. Accuracy can't be taught. I don't know how that's a "waste of bandwidth".

    What is the basis for saying that Cardale is an "inaccurate QB"? His career completion percentage in college was 61.7 and his YPA was 8.6. Why hate on a guy on your own team, with enormous potential, who hasn't even had a chance to play yet? I don't understand it.
  15. He has nothing it takes to be a successful NFL QB. You can all remember this post. If he ever does anything in this league I'll eat crow. He has all the physical ability in the world. He showed what he can do during OSU's national championship run. Then he lost his job to JT freaking Barrett. Inaccurate QB's with big arms are never successful in the NFL.

    As i thought, you are just making a naked pronouncement, backed up by nothing other than your "gut feeling". Complete waste of bandwidth. Just like the guy who has already decided that McDermott will fail as a head coach.
×
×
  • Create New...