Jump to content

Dr. Who

Community Member
  • Posts

    7,048
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Dr. Who

  1. I'm going to hold you personally responsible, but you'll be golden if he's good.
  2. You always laser focus on the boring obvious details.
  3. Alright, fine. My answer is funnier.
  4. It's because he's the Audric Estime of Wide Receivers.
  5. I so want Beane to find a way to get McConkey and Mitchell. Maybe we need Mitchell more, but McConkey is my favorite.
  6. I wonder if you'll get a double digit post total before you are banned.
  7. He's already in the second round at #60. He probably wants to move up from there and get two top forty picks.
  8. AD Mitchell or Ladd McConkey
  9. I'm really hoping Beane can find a way to get both Mitchell and McConkey. I think if he trades out of #33, that won't happen. He would have to take one and trade up from #60 to try to get the other. It would probably cost a 2025 second. I've been higher on McConkey than most, I guess. I think he'd be a perfect player to complement Kincaid, and if you add a boundary X, the WR room goes from deficient to promising.
  10. I just don't see how the fella being only 21 means he is going to grow into a boundary receiver. And if he has to play from the slot to be effective, he's taking Kincaid off the field. Mitchell at least is what they need. If you think the consistency issues are fixable, he has to be the play. If you trade out of #33, I think you're not getting him. Coleman and Franklin might fall. I still think McConkey is going to be an excellent player. I guess we'll see, but Beane has to get 2 WRs tonight, imo.
  11. Well, I want Mitchell and McConkey. @HappyDays wants Coleman and Franklin. I'll split the difference if he will.
  12. Very tired of this take. McConkey is not a slot receiver. He took 80% of his snaps on the outside. He's a flanker, movement Z whatever term you like. They need to get 2 WRs. One of them should be an X, but there absolutely is room for McConkey, who is an out of the box volume receiver year one.
  13. I don't want Coleman and Franklin. I'll probably get Cooper Dejean at #33 and WR in a trade up from 60. I would try to find a way to land Mitchell and McConkey. Polk is a fella I like closer to 60.
  14. I still hate it. I'm not convinced he's a boundary receiver, and he absolutely is not a fella that's going to get you separation, which is what we need. I'd much rather end up with McConkey and Mitchell. Of course, if we take him, I'll hope for the best.
  15. I wasn't that high on the fast feather, but it's going to look bad if he thrives with you evil lot. I still like Mitchell and McConkey. I would have taken either one at #28, but second round and adding draft capital is fine. Maybe Beane will trade back again, who knows?
  16. Yes, he is, and it's McConkey. They should take 2 WRs day 2, regardless. They need an X and a Z.
  17. Folks are talking about Aiyuk and Jefferson. That would cost a lot. I'd at least try and see if Hopkins is available. You sure as hell do not want to turn Josh Allen into a dink and dunk QB. That would be a monstrous waste of talent, and it's not who he is. We need some big play ability. We still lack a boundary receiver to stretch the field. Beane should add 2 WRs tomorrow, one way or another. Yes, tomorrow should be interesting.
  18. Well, supposedly he is good now. You'd have to be convinced he can be durable in the NFL, but I think he is healthy. I live near Athens, and love the guy. I really think he can be a volume receiver year one.
  19. Seriously, Shakir and Samuel, who is a plus gadget guy? That's the best currently in our WR room. Beane has to add. It's terrible right now, and an absolute disservice to Josh Allen. I still like Mitchell and McConkey. I'm not high on Coleman and Franklin, though some are. Might be a draft choice and a veteran that is available.
  20. Jets moved back one, but I take your point.
  21. Alright. Now that we've read out our fortune cookies, let's just watch the draft.
  22. Defeatist attitudes invite defeat. It doesn't make you smarter than the average bear.
  23. It was never, ever very likely.
×
×
  • Create New...