Jump to content

Chilly

Community Member
  • Posts

    12,485
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Chilly

  1. Campy!!! Awesome!
  2. I think Sweed has the potential to be better than Kelly, but that Kelly is likely the more "NFL ready player", simply because he's a better route runner.
  3. I think nfl.com's analysis of Sweed is much more accurate, from watching him play at UT... From http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/limas-sweed?id=322
  4. Now "/. bad"?
  5. I agree that Kelly will adjust to the NFL quicker, as he is a better route runner, but one of Sweeds strengths also is his ability to adjust to a poorly thrown ball.
  6. Malcom Kelly, in previous events, had been clocked at around a 4.45-4.50. Sweed has averaged a 4.50 as well (he ran a 4.46 at the combine).
  7. Uh, what? Thats not at all correct. Sweed couldn't run routes at all before he got to Texas, and what he does know is from what he learned here. He's improved largely, but he's still not a great route runner. To get open, he relies on his strength, and while he doesn't have great top end speed, he does seem to have a quick acceleration ability at times (though he is inconsistent with it). He's very good at finding the hole in a zone over the middle of the field. Also, a penchant for getting injured? He became the starter a few games into 2004, and played every single game in 2004, 2005, and 2006, before he got injured in 2007. He started 39 consecutive games.
  8. Wow, so I didn't see your post and your link, so you decide to stop posting in the forum? A little over reactive, no?
  9. You remind me of ATHF... Really, stuff like... http://youtube.com/watch?v=8X8B1_K8vvo&feature=related
  10. The problem with the argument is that this person endorsing him was a member of Congress. Surely, if Obama had made any impactful legislation, he would have heard about it. Its like Obama's plan to "end earmarks." If you read his site, all he wants to do is make the process more transparent. Sure, its not a BAD thing, but it doesn't equal what he said he would do.... all while claiming he's running a "different" campaign.
  11. As if isn't msuic
  12. This might be the first time I've ever agreed with you.
  13. Do we need to have the discussion again, how electronica > old stuff?
  14. Great, you're making me attack you in a thread based on bashing Obama. How about just "Barack Obama"? He's a jackass, people that support him are largely jackasses, but seriously, using his middle name as a political tactic is lame.
  15. Really, is no one concerned about the cult of Obama? I present...
  16. Judge for yourself...
  17. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/30/us/polit...amp;oref=slogin
  18. lol, I too thought of Equilibrium.
  19. So, you've already seen enough of McCargo to know he shouldn't be a starter? Reed is the slot receiver, Parrish is the 4th, and I think plenty talented to be the 4th WR in a 4-wide set.
  20. Who do you upgrade on a rotation of: McCargo, Stroud, Johnson, WIlliams Who do you replace at WR: Evans, New #2 WR, Reed, Parrish?
  21. Don't you head chefs just search the internet and yell at people Gordon Ramsay style?
  22. Hmm... :I starred in Brokeback Mountain: DAMN! We're still missing it.
×
×
  • Create New...