leh-nerd skin-erd

No, L Ron, that didn't get confusing in the least. The numbers thing is pretty simple---think of it like going to a pizza place and ordering pizza. If you had 17 pieces, well, that's a lot but it's less than 100 pieces. 100 pieces is a lot, too, but less than 150, and so on. I don't really see that as an internet fact or fiction thing, but it would be pretty consistent for you to see it that way. I didn't take Ivermectin, didn't guzzle bleach, got my 2x* vaxx and am alive and well. For every guy on the internet who got confused like you do, I'm betting there are two, three or more individuals dead from the spread of Covid from that mass gatherings that took place over that awful summer. It always fascinated me that in a worldwide pandemic, where millions of lives were at stake, massive amounts of people would gather together, spread the virus and then go home to their families, friends and loved ones...the very young, the healthy, the aged and infirmed, presumably with the mindset that the virus hovered. Thank you. *2x is more than 1x, just an fyi.

Of course I'm right. By extension, of course, you were wrong, maybe due to the emotional investment you have on these issues. Things can get confusing when people lose their cool. Can you imagine, L Ronbo, if another person was like 150x more dangerous...or 175x more dangerous...or even 262x more dangerous? That would be like, way way more for sure. On the other hand, 17x more dangerous would be less. As you say, all would still represent danger, just some more, some less.

I thought so, too. Not so much L Ron, more L Rage.

“We’re” not pretending anything, L. I asked for some clarity on your post about “edgy things” that Harris “can’t get away with”. Those were your thoughts, not mine. Unpredictably, that lead you to this…an odd (there’s that word again) monologue about Trump, bleach, your chubby chasin’ ruminations on Vance’s BMI, your preferred version of acceptable disinformation, and thoughts on weekly news cycles.

I try to keep an open mind about the response by the administration on these events, but everything is made a political event—-everything. To suggest it’s “uncalled for” belies that fact that it’s actually ALWAYS called for by those in charge and running the show. You just don’t like the target this time around. If you were an honest broker of an honest narrative, the recognition that Trump is attempting to do something—anything—-to help those in need would immediately follow your lament about politicians and media politicizing this tragedy. But instead, you offer up “Russian talking point”, Project 2025, and Trump being raised on a KGB kibbutz in Stalingrad. Pure silliness.

Huh. His position can be summed up as “Crisis?…look I don’t want people living outside in Minnesota…”? Did they move Minnesota to Texas?

Up-oh, now it's your turn. I'm not mad about anything, I just prefer a different set of outcomes when I go home at night. On the other hand, there are a whole lot of people marching in that segment, and they likely could lend their blood/sweat/tears/money to helping those dealing with crime and poverty directly.

Welp, I didn’t follow all the hubbub leading up to the exchange, but my feeling has always been the moderators leave this place alone in virtually every case. I felt that way back when the initial purge took place, and I enjoyed interacting with many of the people who moved on. Emotions can run high here, but at some point there should be lines that are not crossed. While I think the job of moderating the board generally is thankless and something I would avoid like the plague, the response was unnecessary. Then again…. “Whatever words we utter should be chosen with care for people will hear them and be influenced by them for good or ill, especially by brainwashed asshats.’ – Buddha

I would think the Soviet-style would be described as government mandated, not inspired. Apologies if I wasn’t clear, but it was really more about the proximity to the people marching in the streets with masks and smoke bombs, and stackable living in general.

When @Roundybout talks about shoehorning the masses into government inspired stackable shoe boxes, this type of activity is what I envision on the streets from time to time. I get that waking to the Starbucks for a venti matcha(whipped cream on the side) and a scone is of value to some people, I just prefer a quieter, less intifada-y evening with people I care about.

Um, yes...everywhere.

It's a shame this is the story. The real story was the 31 year old store owner, family man and contributing member of society that was shot in the face and murdered. Btw, when you mentioned the other day that the family of the Missouri inmate suggested that life in prison was acceptable punishment for the guy you declared innocent, this family supported the execution.

https://floridapolitics.com/archives/695476-citizens-to-shift-up-to-648000-policies-to-private-insurers-starting-next-month/ Insurance companies apply actuarial science to a market, it's not an emotional decision. If a company can thrive, the market improves. If the environment (regulatory, financially) offers promise, they push forward. Prayers up for the good people of Florida.

Well, actually, "all sides" is inaccurate here. One of the sides involved would be the people ultimately entrusted with decision-making here, and it seems they rejected the arguments made by other stakeholders and went with the results determined by the jury. That said, I misunderstood your perspective and thought you were of the mind the process was unfair and weighted against the defendant. I assumed that because you twice mentioned that those ultimately in charge were "sick".

I don't know about declarations of innocence, but questions about the prosecution of the case certainly exist. I'm against the death penalty, so either way it's a shame it was carried out in this case. Btw, it seems as of you're suggesting that the system is rigged to benefit some at the expense of others. Some people feels that is heresy when applied to other situations and sliding application of justice.

Sure, life is complicated and young people are awfully blissfully unaware of the dangers of life while being absolutely certain they have it all figured out. Still, I’m hard-pressed to refer to the dead or victimized as stupid, anymore than I would a young woman out for a run being victimized in some horrific way. I’d probably go with catastrophically naive. It doesn’t change the standards, nor the best practice(s) shared for consideration by your friend.

Same rules apply if you helilawnchair into a musical festival, rape, shoot, bomb, dismember kids out doing what kids do, and kidnap/enslave/rape/execute a few for kicks. Some people will support you because the right type of target was struck. Some people will try and blow up your iPhone. Tell your friend, either way, it won’t be boring.

I'm with @Dochere, Frank. What needs splaining? She celebrated the human form, and an entire of generation of American males probably celebrated, too.

It's telling that your default is to assume fear drives thought processes over things like quality of life, upbringing, personal experience etc. You covered a lot here, too, jumping from grimy to edgy to young v old (or more experienced youngsters as I call 'em), to LGBT issues. You limit your growth following this path. Some people just like grass my man. On the bright side, I'm sure you're doing your part unhomlessing those folks in your sphere.

You called those towns 'wonderbread', certainly not a term reflective of tolerance and/or the fact that different areas are for different people. And, wth is 'whitewashing'...keeping the streets clean? Nice store fronts? Btw---on my google map, at the corner of East Chippewa and Main...there was a Friday's. Are you young hipsters getting grimy at night and ordering the Pot Stickers and Jack Daniels Chicken Thumbs for lunch ion Saturdays?

I just did a google search for Main and Chippewa, looked about and can’t think of a reason I’d want to live there. It looks nice hoping. Then I googled Elma and East Aurora and thought both looked pretty nice to me. I don’t understand the need to trash someone’s choice of where to live because it doesn’t offer what you’re looking for. 🤔

Allowing terrorism to perpetuate and flourish isn't a great deterrent, either.

I don't have access to the story, but it's absolutely awesome to hear. Stepping back a bit, I've been out of WNY for several decades but visit frequently. It's always home to me. Lately, the past few years or so, I've spoken with people who'd children live/attended school in Buff and how much they enjoyed it. The first time I heard that sentiment a couple years back, I nearly fell off my chair after many, many years of "Ohh...you must love snow...".

I don’t know about getting “red-pilled”, I think he’s simply articulating a centrist, sane and reasoned perspective on what used to be a pretty mainstream thought process on such things.

Sociologists have suggested for decades that life would be so much more efficient if everyone liked the same things in movies, clothing, food, and entertainment. Imagine a world where shag haircuts, sweater vests and boot-flared blue jeaned-wearing people sat down for a nice meal of lab-grown sirloin, asparagus, and brown rice was the order of the day. After that, you catch a Mary Tyler Moore sitcom and Carson re-runs. Maybe, some day. (I’m betting pecan strain on that chest pain. It’s an epidemic in WNY).