leh-nerd skin-erd

BG is awesome, I appreciate the updates and the enthusiasm in delivering the message.

I'm going back farther than that though. Its not all that long ago the Irish/Italian/Polish/African-American etc stuck together like glue and crossing lines was generally unthinkable. Over time, people of substance and courage fought the great fight and things got better for many. I'm not naive, racism is prevalent today, and black people are often still on the wrong side of that more often than most. One of the most poignant example of progress (beyond election of congresspeople, senators and BO) came from the most unlikely place: Jussie Smollet. His case was handled like that of a Kennedy, something that never would have happened in Chicago even a short time ago. Outrage followed, just like it would have when a Kennedy strayed and caught a cool break. I support every peaceful protestor out there. I despise looters, anarchists and the like as most people do. Anyway.

As a nation we had been moving past the concept of grouping citizens together by race, skin color, ethnicity. It was far from perfect, but the goal was to treat individuals as individuals. Now, a million LEOs stylized as a hate group, white male toxic culture and one group of privilege based on their skin color regardless of circumstances. There are no new ideas, just cycles of the same stupidity over and over, run by the same divisive puppet masters over and over.

Email. Short for electronic mail, electronic a derivative of electric, clearly a reference to the electric chair. Dog whistle for the death penalty. Dog whistle

Reminder...you never got back to me on the underground conspiracy sites you indicated I visited. I won’t reply to this groundbreaking Vanity Fair article in case it’s another UCS and you’re tricking me. Are you still compiling the list, or can we get to it and you just tap out? Maybe you confused me with other another poster——maybe @MollyHatchet, @AllmanBrosBand or @LucianoPavaratti ? ps: Cosmo has an important article on DJTs eyebrows—turns out he’s fashioned them in the classic stylings of mid-50s KGB operatives. Nothing definitive yet, but they are on the case. Nice looking lady though, we can all agree on that. #babystepz

? I just told Mupps I heard Artemis Pyle on a podcast a few months ago telling the story of the band and the crash. Can’t recall when it originally aired but it’s a crazy, crazy story.

I missed the show at RIch, I was a bit slow discovering my own music as I had an older brother into alternative Music. Steady shots of Zappa, Kinks, Dylan etc. I bought Street Survivors (No flames) after the crash, a good buddy of mine had been to Rich and told me it was a great show. I was always kind of taken by the story of the band, the fragility of life and that a bunch of people really hitting their stride could die so suddenly because someone didn’t fill the &$@#ing gas tank on an airplane. If you are of the mind, share the story. By the way, thanks to my older brother, I can sing along with “Schoolboys in Disgrace” and “Soap Opera” to this day. Great kinks albums!

I am upset you didn’t use the codes, lives are at stake, but if you’re suggesting the real estate guy from a major city may lack dexterity and spill the drippy stuff on the key pad for the nuc....my God. Honestly, I don’t even care anymore that you don’t know what statuesque means, we need to get you to the Joint Chiefs. Promise me you’ll Joe 20 50 00.

Southern rock, Muppito. Know your genres.

I’m not arguing. I supported DJT until you connected the dots on the water scandal. We should talk in code moving forward. If this water thing goes main stream, we’re all in danger. Well, maybe not all, but me and you for sure. From now on use these codes words to throw the intelligence agencies off track: water = drippy stuff President Trump = The real estate guy from a major city Joe Biden = Igotta D’ Mensha The election = TDAITB (the day America is taken back) This will get us started. Be well. Stay Safe. And don’t drink the drippy stuff.

Louis Armstrong was a famous trumleter. There were others but lots of folks think he’s the best trumleter in the history of trumlets.

I can’t really make sense of this reply. I think you’re saying Mueller was muzzled after 3 years, $30m, 400 pages and televised congressional testimony. You may be onto something here. A President drinking water doesn’t seem that outrageous to me, and unless I’m wrong, no one would appear “statuesque” when they were walking, mostly because statues don’t walk. Then I think you’re saying Trump is the only politician to make up stories, which doesn’t seem right at all. What are Truplets? Dictatorship action? What does that even mean?? You’ve given me a lot to think about, especially the water thing. What sort of person drinks water? A dictator obviously. I’m still not sure if you’re with me or not, but if you are, don’t forget to sake Joe the thing and 300 3 zed niner.

I am with you here. I think there should be an investigation into the assistance he received from the foreign country. I’m just spitballing here, but I’d put FBI Director Comey on the case. I’d pull out all the stops. Get the CIA involved and if need be, the DOJ as well. If we have to use some sharp elbows, make up a story or two, use a couple of dirty journalists to play ping pong with some stories planted, well, it’s for the greater good. Let’s not rule out a Special Counsel, either. Let’s get some distinguished older gentleman in there. Robert Mueller comes to mind. He’s articulate, has attention to detail and the likelihood that he’ll end up looking like a doddering old fool in front of the American people is fairly low, less than 60%. We’ll top it all off by giving the SC latitude to investigate everything that Trump has ever done, with an unlimited budget and we’ll squeeze everyone possible with threats against famiiy, friends and reputation. There is no way we can fail. If we do, though, it will be on a spectacular level, exceeding any and all expectations for epic failures. It will be such a humiliation, we can all rest assured that no person with any pride at all would ever admit to being duped so badly. They would vote for a Rhesus monkey if we trotted one up there. if you’re with me.... Internet Joe 303030.

Conservatives want to make that #$@& illegal, too. Can you imagine?

What was absolutely fascinating to me was the miscalculation by the medical professionals about the $#@& that was about to go down. The cheering for “all Black Lives matter” was loud, proud and audible. One contrite soul comes forward to kneel, showing solidarity with the man recording the video. When he inquired about black on black crime, there was a noticeable drop in enthusiasm, so much so that one might wonder if some of the protestors did not care at all about those lives lost. So, he presses them on it, almost like a drill seargant, and you can almost hear the wheels turning in their heads. “Wait, I care about those lives....right? Yeah, of course I do!” and the volume increases, though not at the level of “All Black lives matter”. Then of course, abortion comes up, they are boxed in, he’s just a crazy guy who believes that life in the womb is actually life....a real nut job. The kneeler seems to not know what to do....Do I kneel? Is anyone else kneeling? I can’t kneel for aborted black babies, can I?” One solitary man with an iPhone scrambled the noggins of about 30 doctors, nurses and health care workers. Amazing.

Thank you. For what it's worth, I generally consider, but usually disregard, advice from the following parties. This is not a complete list: The guy running the 3 Card Monte game on the streets of NYC; A televangelist, especially those who's name end in a ''y", as in Jimmy; Anyone with the last name of Kardashian, or those otherwise advertising as a "social influencer"; Affable Internet posters who, while well-intentioned, seem emotionally overburdened and who display a consistent and stunning lack of self-awareness; I'll offer advice in kind, but mine will be something useful to you if you absorb it: When you advocate "independent thinking" and then point to the consumption of the 'mainstream media', by definition, you're following the herd. Additionally, please consider the relative independence of news organizations that pick up stories from a source such as the Associated Press or Reuters. In essence, your argument is "INDEPENDENT THINKERS MEETING AT 4PM, MEET AT THE BEIGE SIGN! WEAR CREAM COLORED SHIRTS AND KHAKIS SO WE CAN TELL EACH OTHER APART!" I agree with you whole heartedly that I am 'going to find legitimate reporting" in virtually every source I use...were you under the impression that I felt otherwise? Speaking candidly, that's on you, not me. You've indicated that I peruse "underground conspiratorial media". In our conversations, I have referenced the Washington Post, NYT, major news networks such as ABC, NBC, and CBS. The WaPo reference was in reply to your link. You also linked on two separate occasions the venerable Vox site, and I simply pointed out problems with the articles posted. One was due to obvious hypocrisy, the other due to a gross misrepresentation of DJTs stand on illegal immigration. So...do tell, what 'underground conspiratorial media" sources have I referenced in our conversation or for that matter, any posting I have made? I'm a mainstream guy. I get along with people. I engage with people. I read 85% of "The Creature From Jeckyl Island" and stopped because it was keeping me up at night. I value relationships, am willing to listen to the opinions of others and my most aggressive conspiracy theory is that the concept that the two party system is an illusion. If you have something else, please, feel free to share. What I have recounted regarding Joe Biden is a matter of public record. The reporting of your beloved and edgy mainstream media----just a second, gotta pay a bill here---Sponsored by Gillette Razors, the best a man can get!---is also a matter of public record. They missed on Russia, intentionally or not. There was no widespread consensus reporting on a major media figure as DJT being the man you have suggested he is over multiple decades. I've seen stories on banks, insurance companies, Johnson Baby Powder, Bernie Madoff, Lance Armstrong, the Police and so on---and again, you zip your coat up, pull the hood down over your ears and suggest I'm being too hard on them. You've made your peace with Joe Biden. He's your guy. Put the sign on the lawn. As I said, when January comes, all you really seem to care about his that Joe Biden will be the 46th Predator of the United States.

Interesting turn of the phrase...."The second Biden". The first Biden's rhetoric on the issues of our time varied between inspiring, hateful, divisive and moronic, his actual record pitiful. The first Biden was a gaffe machine, saying things that were widely mocked, laughed at and scorned, so much so that he was rejected on multiple occasions for consideration to the highest office in the land. The first Biden was, in fact, a running joke. The first Biden was confrontational, flexing his muscles and bragging thereafter about intervening in the affairs of foreign nations, a school yard bully of the type few respect. The second Biden, he's none of those things. He's a rapidly aging elderly man figuratively backing into fences in his 1992 Buick, getting lost in neighborhoods that were once very familiar to him, his mind jumping back and forth to years past and referencing world leaders long dead and gone....blissfully unaware that his old pals are not with us anymore. The average European is an awful lot like the average American. They would not know Elizabeth Warren from Nancy Pelosi, Susan Rice from Condoleezza Rice, or Bernie Sanders from Colonel Sanders. On the other hand, most everyone in the world knows the sad yet often very predictable decline of a once youthful mind. Then again, maybe I am wrong, maybe the second Biden can bring all the world leaders together and offer solutions. I personally cannot imagine Biden in a room with Winston Churchill, Charles de Gaulle, Golda Meir, and Leonid Brezhnev, all working on global issues but here's the good news---I bet the second Biden can, and likely has.

They should reach out to our boy @SoCal Deek if they want designs to build a wall that will stand the test of time and be architecturally compelling. This looks like a fort in the woods built by 12 year old children of liberal parents. These weren’t built by tradespeople.

The irony....a massage therapist with no happy ending to be found.

Oh, now I get it. You’re referring to the many, many many investigative reports conducted by ABC, NBC MSNBC and the like when DJT’s hit television show The Apprentice was on the air from 2004-2017. I had forgotten the hard-hitting expose on Trump, and of course all the stories the ran in the years leading up to the series premiere. All they talked about 24/7 was Trump being a racist, Trump being a sexual predator. You couldn’t get away from it. 60 minutes. Dateline. NBC News with Brian Williams. Remember when they brought him down? It was balls to walls coverage. Same when he was promoting Art of The Deal. When it hit the NYT bestseller list, remember how the entire staff walked out in protest? What about when Clinton’s watchdog, Mueller, when he had unlimited scope and power to investigateTrump for anything, and that scathing report of criminal racist behavior and the many crimes that he was charged with. Or not. If you believing I believe DJT is “squeaky clean” helps assuage a troubled conscience as you vote for Dirty Hands Joe, I’ll carry the burden, chuckling along the way. You crack me up!

It looks like Storytime for Simpletons. Is Biden even awake?

that's very interesting. excellent, thanks.

Actually, the true test comes when someone else violates his personal space and reaches toward his n*ts. It's easy to be judgemental when someone else's n*ts are in play.

I want to let you know I read up to the point where you said "...I didn't read the rest of that post.". Respect is like a delicate flower. Planting it is the east part, but from there it must be watered and tended to else it withers. I'm not certain why you sent me both an opinion and a propaganda piece from Vox if you were not willing to engage in subsequent dialogue, and felt it necessary to be disrespectful in your reply. It's ok to do so, it just gives the appearance of you being overly emotional in a dialogue where it serves no purpose that I can see. Hence, my read was "you appeared frustrated". We can both do better, but you need to be more better better.

I understand his perspective on Trump, and his reasons for despising the President. I really do. We all make our choices. What's fascinating to me is the reverence he has for Biden. To suggest it's only a blind spot would be akin to suggesting Helen Keller was only slightly visually impaired.