a player to be named later

Jacobs and Golisano seem like the only ones that could lead a team. They both have buffalo ties and enough backing. Who says that it needs to be a buffalo business person. What would be wrong with having a Canadian owner? Toronto most likely has more billionaires than Buffalo. Just because someone is from Canada doesn't mean that they will want to move it there. The New Jersey Nets have a Russian owner he doesn't want to move it there.

1. Any Parsley Garnish (especially when it is finely diced into dust) 2. The term "Still Pickin" 3. When the soup is Campbells (yea Salvatore's I'm talking to you) 4. When they take your fork and fail to replace it 5. When they take or give the check and don't come back quickly 6. When seafood is just straight up bad and they serve it anyways (it has happened to me so many times that I almost refuse to order it)

Beating the patriots would be a start. home, away, it doesn't matter.

Al Davis gloats about that from time to time. Wonder if we'll see the day when a team announce it is moving and then the Raiders block it and move back to LA.

Sorry one more... Predator "Dlyan, you sob... Looks like the CIA's got you pushing pencils"

What about the feeling when you come across a movie like that, it is like finding 20 bucks in your pocket. Many of the classics have been named... Here are some others... Uncle Buck as on last weekend. I stuck with it for awhile. Wedding Crashers Patriot Games Clear and Present Danger Christmas Vacation during the holidays

Tunnel is a good idea in my opinion... Just get it done already!

Moving Lynch would be the same thing as moving Peters. You'll end up having to use a pick to replace him and you won't have an idea of what you will get. You have to have two RB's in the league nowadays. We have enough holes to plug without creating another one! I thought that our obsession with stockpiling DB's died with Jauron...

I always wonder how these lists are created... I'm sure weather economy, etc... are major variables. Except for the fact that they don't take into account the drastically low cost of living or the fact that there are things to do in the winter. Personally I would move back to Buffalo rather than be in one of those hellish cities that just big wide streets full of big box stores and chain restaurants... Elmwood Village was ranked as a top community in the USA if that is worth anything... Maybe not to Forbes.

He plays in one of the harder (more competitive divisions in football) and has put up respectable numbers with bad teams and more offensive coordinators than we have gone through. I think he is a legit starter in this league especially after the number he put up and the locke room distractions that he had to go through. He is a stand up guy that puts up numbers against hard teams.

A plan like this is good for the overall league. At the end of the day the big teams benefit from having teams like the Bills, Colts, etc. It makes the league more popular and relevant in areas that might not be able to support a team with a new stadium, and debt.

I don't thing that population is the best metric to use when determining franchise viability. Just another small note, not sure if it means anything, but... Working in a corporate office of a franchisor some of the offices in smaller cities are viewed just as important as our larger cities. Presence in smaller cities is important to the brand of our company. That being said, I'm not sure that there are many potentially profitable markets for the NFL. Is it in the best interest of the NFL to move teams to different cities other than LA?

Wouldn't Toronto have to show that they could support a team? Do you think the Rodgers corp will sign a similar deal with the Bills after the 5 year deal comes up? Have they made money on this deal? Once the LA spot is filled is there another location outside of Toronto that can support a team? Lastly, I know that it doesn't make a real difference but why wouldn't the Bills raise the price on tickets? If we sell out games without going to the playoffs in a decade why wouldn't you raise up the ticket prices? It seems like there is some wiggle room to raise the prices and maybe not sell out a game or two.

Has the NFL ever tried to move a franchise there and had it blocked by Davis? I think Davis is just in love with the image that he has created for himself. I seem to remember that Al was left out of the merger talks and didn't even know there had been a merger (a the time he was commissioner of the AFL). I think if they could push something through like that then, they could do the same now.

Why announce something on a friday? That is usually the day that people let out bad news.