ndirish1978
-
Posts
8,126 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by ndirish1978
-
-
The Pass catching Depth chart will be
- Dalton Kincaid
- Shakir
- Curtis S
- James Cook
- Rookie
- Rookie
- Dawson Knox
Unless there is a major trade up, which I don't expect. This is what we're going to run with this year.
-
I'd rather take Legette at 28, trade back in rd 2 and get Javon Baker in Rd 3.
-
1
-
-
5 hours ago, Tipster19 said:
The Titans traded for Calvin Ridley which doesn’t bode well for Burks. Having DeAndre Hopkins, Ridley and the #7 pick overall in this year’s draft puts them in the right position to select one of the top 3 WRs.
I believe that Beane is going to move up in the draft for either Brian Thomas Jr or Adonai Mitchell but adding another WR is still a real possibility. Being a former 1st rd pick that hasn’t stayed healthy makes Burks expendable. If Beane could get him cheap that would be a low risk high ceiling WR prospect for the Bills imo.
I'd rather stay put and draft Legette
-
-
-
1 minute ago, Warriorspikes51 said:
why is everyone acting like we're taking an additional 31 million? It's an additional 3-4 million hit. That's it.
You're right. Just sucks to be eating 31M in cap for someone not even contributing to the team. But if he was starting to be more of a problem than an asset you have to get rid of him.
-
2
-
1
-
-
Diggs simply dropped below the line on the Vicky Mendoza diagonal.
-
1
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
-
Just now, Cray51 said:
A lot of people that were trashing Diggs as a non-impact player in the back half of last year are coming out now and upset that we traded our star talent.
I loved Diggs, but I understand why he was moved. Any disruption/age/injury/cap implications are valid
No one cares about this from a football perspective other than it creating a hole at a position. Eating 31M in cap space for a return of a pick NEXT year is the issue.
-
3 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:
That's the "by the book" breakdown.
Houston can take on any amount they want, and even trade us cash for a player.
We'll have to see how this shakes out.
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, CaptnCoke11 said:
Top 40 pick (most likely)for an aging WR is good value
Not in NEXT years draft. 2nd rd pick in the next year is always devalued by 1 rd when considering compensation. It also doesn't help us draft his replacement at all.
-
Terrible return on this trade. How much of a cancer does a guy have to be behind the scenes for you to eat 31M cap hit and get rid of WR1.
-
1
-
-
7 hours ago, SoonerBillsFan said:
Let me guess another fan saying defense round 1?
If you don't know who Joe Marino is I can't help you.
-
For everyone WR or bust, I implore you to watch this video.
-
1
-
1
-
-
I would be thrilled with that trade up for a DE
-
1
-
-
I love Beane. That said, I don't hace confidence that there will be difference making WRs near pick 28 and I don't see us hitting on an early rd DE because frankly I don't have confidence in this FO's ability to identify and draft DLmen. A rotational DT plays 40-50% of the snaps and is involved in every single play they are on the field for. A backup WR, which is what I believe will be left around 28, can run dozens of routes and will realistically affect 4-6 plays with catches and maybe a couple more if they can block well. Unless we get a gift dropped in our lap I don't really see how a top 5-10 WR is better for our team than a rotational piece with upside. We are going to put Shakir, Samuel and Diggs out there half the plays and drop Shakir to put in another TE in 12 personnel. There are realistically 4 WRs that could come in and convince this staff to sit Shakir or Samuel and we're not sniffing them barring a miracle.
-
1
-
-
9 minutes ago, papazoid said:
played with SF last year
PFF rank #64 of 130 interior defenders (DT's)
#81 Tim Settle
#129 Jordan Phillips
Played 14 games for the CHARGERS last year, was a team captain and had just signed an extension. He got cut when the coach was axed because they wanted to give young players a shot and they knew they were going to be purging the cap this year. Picked up by SF at the end of the year.
-
3
-
2
-
-
This is how I feel about this
-
1
-
-
-
10 minutes ago, NewEra said:
We have a handful of holes. There are several solid safeties still available. Sometimes you have to wait a bit to get one for the right price. That’s my guess.
hollins has a skill set unlike most available FA WRs. A skill set that this FO/coaching staff covets. We have gaping holes at WR too. That’s why we are spending money on Rotational players when there is a gaping hole at S.
I expect WR to be filled in the draft. I'd just rather have Justin Simmons than Armstead. That's just my opinion, you can feel free to disagree with me though.
-
2
-
-
1 hour ago, Warriorspikes51 said:
got to think outside the boxArik & Rousseau at DE against the run.
Arik & Ed inside against the pass.
He is fully capable of playing anywhere on our DL and has done so with the Niners
It would be nice to have if we were a team with cap space, but we aren't. Taylor Rapp is our only starting safety and I don't even like him that much. Why are we spending money on rotational players when there is a gaping hole at S?
-
I don't understand why you'd put big money into a 3 tech when we already paid a younger one. He would be nice to have in a rotation but we need a starting S and there is a big market for them and that position pays much less. With the size of our LBs you'd think another 1 tech should be a priority cause we're a different defense if DaQuan is out.
-
1
-
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
-
17
-
3
-
59
-
1
-
Mock draft simulators.
in The Stadium Wall
Posted