Crap Throwing Monkey

Indicting myself? You're a wart. Why would you expect me to take you seriously?

But you're wrong, because someone threw a cup at Ron Artest...

You're just jealous because his looks better than yours...

But you're still flinging around justifications for it. Burn any good movies lately, too?

I think the only thing dumber than plastering your car with political slogans is bitching about people who do... WHO CARES??? THEY'RE BUMPER STICKERS!!!!

And this is coming from a Miami fan...a legitimate expert on "pathetic"...

How in the mother!@#$ing name of all that is holy did this turn into a "But Ron Artest was hit by a cup!!!!" thread??????

A "Constitutionalist"? He's lying. Anyone who knows him can tell you he's a LaRouche Democrat...

Somehow, somewhere, someone is calling this a civil rights violation...

Shatner was actually a well thought of Shakespearean actor before doing Star Trek. As was Patrick Stewart, for that matter...

"My little potato head", actually. Though you're correct with the little translation.

And apparently to stuff your kids in the trunk...

The article's speculation that "self" is a fiction. DID I consider a real albiet poorly understood syndrome...but the speculative result the article draws is pretty far out there, though not an unfounded speculation and worth investigation.

Who am I, beausox? I miss the :I starred in Brokeback Mountain: smiley.

Au contraire, mon petit tete de pommes de terre. I don't rely on ad hominem attacks. I just don't bother expending any more effort on you than ad hominem attacks.

It's not that it isn't credible; the fundamental basis is sound. But the speculation, while credible, is certainly aggressive. I'd say the idea, while far from being something that can be considered a workable theory, is interesting and well-founded enough to be worth serious investigation.

Sure..."BF_in_Indiana"...

You particularly don't need 50 witnesses when 45 of them can't testify to the actual accusations, but only to presumed prior bad acts, and ones of which there's no criminal record...which is why they needed 50 witnesses, because their actual case was weak enough that they felt they needed to introduce prejudicial testimony...which the judge allowed??? I learned this stuff watching reruns of "Law & Order"...and I know that has about an accurate portrayal of trial law as a cheese sandwich. And the MJ prosecutors couldn't even manage to achieve that level of propriety? Jacko's going to get off not because he's innocent, and not because he's got a kick-ass defense team...but because he's being prosecuted by a bunch of !@#$ing monkeys.

But at least he seems to have an active imagination. Of course, given that he can't discriminate between fiction and non-fiction...

Keep it. It's not often I see someone who intentionally makes himself look goofier than I do...

I'll watch the WNBA when they change the uniforms to string bikinis and start signing Victoria's Secret models...

A legend in your own mind...

How do we know that's off topic? Maybe TD is Ramius' girlfriend...

That's you? What, is TD making you wear that crap on your chin?

CSI Miami isn't the real world?