Billz4ever

Diggs has caught over 100 balls each of the last 3 seasons, is the only receiver we have that puts any fear in defenses, and you wanted to get rid of him last season? We're in need of a legit WR2 and you're talking about getting rid of our WR1. 😆

Our Diggs is a bigger piece of our team than their Diggs is to their's. He should come here. We'll give them Ed 😂

You're saying that wasn't simply his emotions running hot in the Cincy game and he actually wants out of Buffalo? What are you basing this on?

Nope, extremely happy for Dabs and I hope they keep improving on the success they had this season.

Agreed. The NFL has shifted and coaches (particularly defensive coaches) either learn to adapt, or they get left in the dust. The adage "defense wins championships" isn't as true as it used to be. With the high-powered offenses and the rules always being adjusted in favor of the offense and scoring more points, there has to be a point where a coach decides that the defense doesn't have to be perfect. It just has to be good enough and you can't continue dumping your best resources into one side of the ball, when the side you need to score points is being carried by one guy, and against good teams, needs help to win.

Which should be the priority of any organization I would think and hope. If you aren't arming and protecting the face of your franchise, I question your priorities and your ability to ever bring home a Championship. Guess they thought Diggs would be all we needed and we could do everything else offensively on the cheap, while pouring a ton of resources into the defense with not a lot to show for it given what was spent.

The personal foul came on a 5-yard run on a 3rd and 4 at the Cincy 47. To make it sound like the only reason they won is because of that is just not factual. Chiefs would've had a 1st down at the Cincy 42 with time left anyway. And explain how you get over 300 yards and 67% completion without making good throws?

We'll let's put this to rest right here so we can move on. The wildcard game the week prior the divisional loss. Allen threw 2 picks, lost a fumble returned for a TD, took 7 sacks, and had a much lower completion %. You're literally comparing that to a game where Mahomes had a way better completion percentage, threw no picks and lost 1 fumble.

The bottom line is Mahomes played a good game and did what he needed to do to get his team the W and that's literally all that matters.

You're entire argument is based on hypotheticals that you have no way of knowing the outcome. If there's an "if" in your argument, it's not a real argument. It's a prediction based of a hypothetical situation, so it's literally impossible to claim it's true. You should change your name to Homer63. You've clearly proven you can't leave homer bias out of your thinking. Yep, their argument is just like the Brady argument. He's just a product of the system. Any mistakes are his fault and any of Josh's mistakes are because of the people around him and not really his.

Using that same logic, you can't call Allen MVP either since a backup QB did the same in one drive as Allen did in an entire game.

67% completion, 326 yards, 2 TDs and no picks isn't a good game? In what universe?

Take a guess which team won and which team lost against the same team a week apart.

And Josh has Diggs. Mahomes had fewer weapons than he did last season. The Bills were the team favored to win the SB, not the Chiefs, so trying to pretend the Bills were a garbage team carried by Allen isn't going to fly. And he did have better numbers than Allen. 6 more TDs, 2 fewer INTs, a thousand more yards, 4 points better in completion %, and 10 points in QB rating.

The point is they won, so what's your point? Allen and the Bills got their butts whooped at home by the very same team the Chiefs beat.

OK, so what are you saying? That Allen should've been MVP over Mahomes when Mahomes has better numbers and did it minus one of the best receivers in football?

So you're saying the Bills don't have a great team, GM, and coach? As far as offensive weapons, Mahomes has Kelce. That's about it. They traded away one of the best WRs in football and he still threw for over 5K yards and 40 TDs. We don't have to downplay what the Bills have to somehow make it look like Mahomes is just a product of a good team. The Bills were the team favored to win the SB, not the Chiefs.

Tough to argue he's not looking at his numbers and what he was able to do minus Hill.

The Saints trade for Saffold? LMAO Besides being one of the worst ranked Guards in the league, he's a UFA anyway. Curious as to why you drafted 2 OTs back-to-back instead of getting a true Guard.

Yeah, he's definitely not an effective blitzer. I've seen him get stopped in his tracks by RBs meeting him as he comes through the gap. You would think he'd be a better blitzer, even if not getting the sack, but just getting closer to the QB and getting his arms up considering his height and wingspan.

Would love to have been a fly on the wall in some of the discussions there. Maybe there was some shade thrown at the WR staff for Gabe underperforming and the rest of the WR corps in general outside of Diggs. or Maybe his contract was up as pointed out and he just wanted to go to nicer weather. We'll probably never know.

Several good FA RBs available for waaay less than $14M. If they can't put together a quality O-line, it doesn't matter who the RB is. Spending $14M on a RB with trash blocking in front of him is like putting racing slicks on a Prius and throwing money out the window as you drive down the road.

The latest mock on ESPN+ has us taking Mauch in the first round, which I see as a stretch. I think we can get quality OL in the second, third, and even fourth. I don't think the higher prospect WRs will still be on the board when we pick in the second, so if we want one, they will have to do it in the first. Either that or try to trade out of the first to pick earlier in the second and get an additional pick in the process.

Ah, gotcha. Not sure why I was thinking UFA vs restricted FA.

It's an option, but an expensive one and risky as you said. They would have to find a suitor who wants him first, then the other team would probably try to low ball us on any draft picks included in the deal since they know our cap situation.