Jump to content

GASabresIUFan

Community Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    654

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by GASabresIUFan

    Did we do enough at wide receiver?

    in The Stadium Wall

    Posted

    11 minutes ago, VW82 said:

    Said this in other threads, but I wonder if the addition of Davis will free up Cook for more snaps lined up as a receiver. 

    Despite the contrarians on this thread, I think with Diggs gone, Brady (and thus Josh) has the freedom to try anything and with all the skill personnel. We will see 12 personnel (Kincaid and Knox), we'll see Cook split out, Samuel in the backfield and we could easily see Davis and Cook on the field at the same time. 

     

    The most exciting thing is Josh is no longer handcuffed having to feed Diggs.  My bold prediction for this coming season is we'll see the most dynamic offense Josh has ever QB'd.  

    • Like (+1) 2

    Grade the 2024 Bills draft class

    in The Stadium Wall

    Posted · Edited by GASabresIUFan

    I give Beane and company a solid B+.  There are things to like about every single pick, and I like that we filled most of holes in the roster.

     

    I think we have at least 3 potential starters in this class.  Coleman will start this season and depending on how camp goes, I think Van Pran and Bishop will push at worst for immediate PT.  If either Edwards falters, Van Pran and Bishop will become starters this season.  Bishop has size and speed.  Van Pran allowed only 1 sack in 1300 passing attempts while at UGA and Coleman had 20 TD catches the last 2 years.  This stats stood out to me when I realized that Shakir, Kincaid and Diggs only had 9 TDS on 246 targets from week 7 through the playoffs.  Having someone that can go up and grab a ball in the red zone and end zone is a huge upgrade for our passing attack.

     

    I didn't know much about Solomon and Ulofoshio before the draft, but hard to argue with drafting the FBS sack leader in Solomon and a Butkus Award finalist in Ulofoshio in the late stages of the draft.  If Solomon can have a similar impact in the pros as he did in college (a big if), it will help Beane move on from Miller.

     

    I also love the Davis pick.  He is excellent catching out of the backfield, can make tacklers miss and get tough yards.  He will thrive in Buffalo.  Carter is by all accounts a really good football player in the 3 technique which is something we needed depth at.  He is also a smart kid, a team leader at Duke and they say he is good against he run.

     

    Both lineman are developmental but are huge and athletic.  We'll see if the CB (Hardy) can play CB in the NFL, but he is fast and could easily out battle Hamler for the kick returner job.  

     

    Biggest complaints are Coleman lack of speed (although his in game speed is very good) and our failure with 10 picks to add a speed receiver option to help stretch the field.

     

    I'm a little surprised at Beane made all 10 choices.  With the Diggs trade, the pick 144 for the Bears 4th in 2025 and compensatory picks, I think the Bills now have as many as 12 picks in 2025.

     

     

     

     

     

    • Agree 1

    Did we do enough at wide receiver?

    in The Stadium Wall

    Posted · Edited by GASabresIUFan

    I posted this in another thread but it belongs here as well.

    Quote

     

    Here are some stats after week 6 when we opened up the offense and started using Kincaid and Shakir more.  (Stats include the playoffs)

    Diggs - 111 tgts, 68 rec, 636 yards, 3 TDS, Catch % 61.26, yards/att  5.73

    Kincaid - 83 tgts, 64 rec, 659 yards, 3 TDS, Catch % 77.11%, yards/att 7.94

    Shakir - 52 tgts, 45 rec, 646 yards, 3 TDS, Catch % 86.54%, yards/att 12.42

     

    Which of these players would you keep if you were the GM?  Also add that Diggs only had 19 explosive plays on 160 targets, while Shakir had 17 on 45 targets in the regular season.

     

    Also combine comparison between Shakir and Diggs (both were 5th rd picks)

    Shakir - 6' 196, 4.43 40, 1.49 10 yard split, 34.5 vertical - 78 Athleticism score

    Diggs - 6' 195, 4.46 40, 1.53 10 yard split, 35 vertical - 69 Athleticism score  

     

     

    FYI:  Why do I think and others think Shakir can replace Diggs.  He is physically nearly identical to Diggs, younger, cheaper, more productive since week 7 and more explosive.  

     

    As to the thread question as to whether we did enough, I would argue we had if Coleman was faster.  He certainly is a replacement for Davis and if when we move Shakir to DIggs' former position and Samuel to the slot, I think you can make a reasonable argument that the starters are set.  Add Kincaid and Cook and you have a very nice group of targets for Josh.  The question of depth beyond the starters at WR is a legit question.

     

    Right now we have Hollins, Shorter, Hamler & Isabella.  Color me un-impressed.  

    • Like (+1) 1

    Day 3 Bills Trades

    in The Stadium Wall

    Posted · Edited by GASabresIUFan

    Bills traded pick 144 (5th rd) to the Bears for the Bears 4th rd pick in 2025

     

    Bills trade pick 163 (6th rd pick) to GB for 168 and 219.  This gets us back to 10 picks in this draft.

    • Haha (+1) 1

    Rd 4, Pick 128: RB Ray Davis, Kentucky

    in The Stadium Wall

    Posted

    3 minutes ago, Clyde Smith said:

    I wanted Guerendo, but I'm happy with this pick.

    I like Guerendo also, size and speed.  That said, I never thought Davis would still be on the board here.

     

    I got to watch him often in the SEC.  We are going to like this kid.  

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Agree 1
    • Awesome! (+1) 1
    • Thank you (+1) 1

    What can we expect on day 3?

    in The Stadium Wall

    Posted · Edited by GASabresIUFan

    1 hour ago, Ethan in Cleveland said:

    By cutting Diggs and not adequately addressing WR we are a worse team now than the one that barely won the divison and lost in the playoffs. 

     

    I'm sorry, but I'm not at all sad that we traded Diggs.  I think Kincaid and Shakir with Samuel and now Coleman will make up a better group of pass catchers then we had last season as Diggs' 160 targets get spread around better as Josh won't have to feed a Prima Donna, but instead focus on throwing to who is actually open.

     

    Here are some stats after week 6 when we opened up the offense and started using Kincaid and Shakir more.  (Stats include the playoffs)

    Diggs - 111 tgts, 68 rec, 636 yards, 3 TDS, Catch % 61.26, yards/att  5.73

    Kincaid - 83 tgts, 64 rec, 659 yards, 3 TDS, Catch % 77.11%, yards/att 7.94

    Shakir - 52 tgts, 45 rec, 646 yards, 3 TDS, Catch % 86.54%, yards/att 12.42

     

    Which of these players would you keep if you were the GM?  The player on the downside of his career or the kuds who were just as productive but have upside? Also add that Diggs only had 19 explosive plays on 160 targets, while Shakir had 17 on 45 targets in the regular season.

     

    Also combine comparison between Shakir and Diggs (both were 5th rd picks)

    Shakir - 6' 196, 4.43 40, 1.49 10 yard split, 34.5 vertical - 78 Athleticism score

    Diggs - 6' 195, 4.46 40, 1.53 10 yard split, 35 vertical - 69 Athleticism score  

×
×
  • Create New...