Jump to content

P Riv

Community Member
  • Posts

    327
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by P Riv

  1. I like the consistency of a good/great roster.  However, where did we improve our coverage of TE's?  Against the run?  Our running game?  2021 will be a totally different season and its nor realistic to expect 13-3 is our floor and things will go according to plan with us in the Conf Championship.  We have a great offensive cast, but no depth other than QB.  We need to be able to grind it out with a tough running game if we need to.  That wasn't there last year and its not been addressed.  

    • Like (+1) 1
  2. 5 minutes ago, QCity said:

    Our window to win is the next dozen years.

     

    Thats what Indy thought when they had Andrew Luck.  If our "window" is basically Josh's career, then KC has the same window more or less.  

    At some point, the FO will have to figure out a way to go "all in" or stack the deck in our favor to get the edge on KC.

    Right now they have to figure out how to win the division in dominant fashion and try to get home field in the playoffs.  We could easily go 8-0 at home, but 4-4 on the road, which means on the road at some point in the playoffs.  

  3. 4 hours ago, Sammy Watkins' Rib said:

     

    Even those metrics, which are Cam's best, are still bottom half of the league. I guess we can say he appears to have nowhere to go but up so glass half full for the Patriots in terms of Cam playing better next year. 


    I don't see it as half full, just a matter of NOT taking last year as a template to project how he would do this season.  Year 2 in the same system, full offseason, better personnel around him, etc.  They were only 54% in the Red Zone last year for scoring, so I'm pretty sure thats why they went out and got 2 new TE's and a slot.  They are now loaded at TE, slot, FB, have solid RBs and a physical O-line. 

  4. 13 minutes ago, Sammy Watkins' Rib said:

     

    Bigger picture. Cam was terrible last year. Not just against the Bills. 

     

    Seems that way, but fact is he completed 65.8% of his passes for a 7.2 yard average, with no offseason in a new and complicated offense and with virtually no one to throw to.  I say don't be surprised if he turns it around.  As if NE's brain trust is all of sudden completely amateur and stupid... With their Defense, Special teams and running game, all he really needs to do is hit his own career average numbers.  If average Cam shows up, they are a very tough team.  

    Every season is different, so I don't expect them to be worse than 7-9 and I don't expect us to be 14-2 or better.  We're a 10+ win team, and they may also be a 10 win team now.  Tough competitive division.

     

     

     

  5. 35 minutes ago, PatsFanNH said:

    Michel on the last year of his co tract and Fornette is just a brute runner mix him in with Harris and we have a great one two punch.. 

     

    As for Jimmy G I see a better chance BB trading up in the draft and getting the QB he feels be the best fit for NE. (I say Mac Jones or Trey Lance)


    I'm just watching with concerned curiosity.  Its the same template that's been used since the 80's Giants, mid 90's Browns to 2019.  Last year was a flyer and most people get that, but it seems to go under the radar here.   

  6. 14 hours ago, PatsFanNH said:

    The TE are a huge improvement over what we had.  As you said it all comes down to QB, even then I see Bills winning the division followed by NE. I am expecting a step back by Miami in year two of Tua. 

     

    What's the news on NE trying to get Fournette?  The idea of that happening and then they somehow get Garrapolo back does actually scare me.  

  7. Belichick's defensive game plan for SB XXV against the prolific K-gun is in the NFL HoF.  The Giants beat us with Jeff Hostetler at QB and the offense looked like what they're building in NE now.  Granted their Defense doesn't look like the 1990 Giants, but the point is he builds a team according to certain base principles, plays disciplined football and wins the close ones.  Expect to see exactly that this year.  

    I keep seeing this habit of assuming our guys will play at their best, their guys will probably play at their worst kind of forecasting.  As if Newton won't improve in year 2, etc.  

    We're the favorites and they're a legit threat, that's reality.  

    • Dislike 1
  8. Brady won it because he handled Spagnola's blitzes, distributed the ball to open receivers, kept the sticks moving and was VERY accurate.  The offense was efficient because of him.  Call it pedestrian numbers, but consider how pretty much every other QB has looked against the Chiefs D all season.  

    Brady was Brady, and he won't be in our Div next season.  👍

    • Like (+1) 2
    • Agree 1
  9. 30 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

     

    Yea, they will. And hopefully no QB solution magically appears. Because if they get all their opt out guys back and they get a QB they could be good pretty quickly. 

     

    I don't think they're good enough to win out.  If they can beat the Rams, I'll change my opinion.  

    I suspect this is their year to digest all the cap hits from the last 4-5 years, evaluate their young talent and find a QB.  They will be back next year in a way we are all too familiar with.  They have a ton of cap space, free agents will be cheaper and there's going to be a few quality QB prospects out there for them if the part ways with Newton.  

  10. 14 hours ago, BADOLBILZ said:

     

     

    This may be the first time in my 22+ years on TSW that someone has called me a "homer".:lol:

     

    I said.... "Compelling argument, but to my ears its tainted with Homerism".  That pertains to the argument you laid out there, the one with situational stats lacking overall context and opinions slanted towards "winning".  If I wanted to call you a Homer, it would have gone something like, "you are a Homer".  

    You're posts are clearly biased for Bruce and I get that, he was our guy, doesn't mean I have to agree and regardless, my argument remains sound.  

     

     

  11. 4 hours ago, BADOLBILZ said:

     

     

    1) The right tackles on all of those 3, difficulty defining teams you mentioned..........none of them even made a single pro bowl at RT in their entire careers........how do they compare to Bruce Armstrong and Richmond Webb and Tony Boselli and Mark Tuinei and and Jumbo Elliott?    

     

    2) Clyde Simmons played opposite of Reggie White at RDE in Philly........he faced the left tackles on those teams......studs like Jumbo Elliott and Joe Jacoby........and he put up 55 sacks and an un-*****-believable 455 tackles in a 4 season stretch from 1989-1992.    That defensive front just ran to the ball.  There is a reason why he has more career sacks than JJ Watt will likely ever get but JJ is a first ballot HOF'er TODAY..........and Clyde is still waiting for a call.    It isn't the lack of a dominant stretch or All Pro accolades.  It's because everyone knows his numbers were inflated.

     

    3)The Bills played with leads.........they also rested players with leads.   It was the club Marv way and probably bought Bruce some extra years at the expense of a bunch of cheap sacks in the second half of blowouts.    And having the better team doesn't begin to offset the statistical scheme advantage of White playing his entire career in a 4-3,  the 46 in particular, and on lines where he wasn't the only player who could dominate games.    With all due respect to Phil Hansen and Jeff Wright and Leon Seals......Bruce was the only elite pass rusher on the Bills defensive line.   And White's teams were mostly good so don't give me a line of sh*t about him not getting chances to rush the passer with leads he played in 2 Super Bowls himself.   

     

     

     

    1)  Jackie Slater got the Pro-bowl nod at RT every year during that period, so saying just because those teams I mentioned didn't have a pro-bowl RT is a non-starter.  Every one of them was a top tier running team.  All of them.  What did NE have?  Miami running game during the Marino era??? lol  The Jets?  Indy had Dickerson for a hot minute, but no QB to help him.  

     

    2) Reggie got doubled or Jerome Brown, not Clyde Simmons.  Also makes sense to run at Simmons, not White...no?  

     

    3)  Looking at Smith's 90 season, all of his sacks came against inferior opponents.  He got shut out against Miami, the NY Giants among others.  He feasted on the Jets, Colts, etc.  As far as resting and missing pass rushing opportunities, sounds like BS to me.  I watched those games, that might happen very late (plausible but not fact), but not very often and definitely not enough to have an impact on his stats.  He had 19 sacks that year, 10 came from games against the 6-10 Jets, 7-9 Colts and 1-15 Patriots.  Against the Pats it was common for them to move him across the line away from Armstrong also.  I think Smith registered about 5 of his 200 sacks against Armstrong and they didn't exactly have Brady back there...lol

     

    Not drinking the Bruce Kool Aid, nope....  He was awesome, but he's still a dominant number 2 and Reggie White is number 1.  Stats prove it, strength of schedule/opponents backs that.

  12. 20 hours ago, BADOLBILZ said:

     

     

    White was great but the 46 defense for a DE was like being a WR in the run and shoot.........the design produced numbers.......in that case sacks and TFL's........but at the risk of big plays.

     

    White also got sack-fat off of a lot of really poor right tackles while Bruce was playing against a lot of stud LT's.    His finest moment as a pro was his 2 sacks against the lowly Max Lane...basically a guard playing out of position......in the Super Bowl.    That was about the equivalent of when Bruce lined up against Everett McIver and Bruce Matthews at LT..........he put up 9 sacks and knocked Boomer Esiason out cold over those two games.  

     

    When Reggie had to go up against Erik Williams of the Cowboys........the only real top-LT-quality comp at RT........he was obliterated...........he put up a no tackle, no sack game against him in the playoffs..........so he would have had his hands full against the league's better LT's like Richmond Webb and Bruce Armstrong in the AFC East.

     

    That's not to say White wasn't one of the best ever..........but the reality is that he also had every advantage a DE could ever ask for..........his circumstances permitted him to max out his production.

       

    Bruce played in a "read and react" 34 defense.    He rushed the passer a fair share but that defense just wasn't designed to wreak havoc at the expense of the back end.   When he finally got to play in a 4-3,  he was already very old and washed up, but he immediately put up a 10 sack season.   And while with Washington he was basically the only guy in the league who was giving Orlando Pace and Walter Jones fits in pass pro. 

     

    Bruce is the all time sack leader but he was also the best,  full sized defensive lineman pass rusher ever.    There have been a lot of great pass rushers in the past 20 years but they haven't made one quite like him and his rare combination of size, speed, quickness, technique, power, long arms and that ground hugging bend since.   

     

     

    This is just plain bad history... White played against the SB Champion 86 Giants, 87 Redskins, 90 Giants twice a year.  Those O-lines were elite, so I'm not sure what your smokin here... 

    That and if the defensive alignment White played in was so great for pass rushers, name another player that posted stats like White.  Perhaps you could explain why White's sacks per game AND tackles per game were both higher than Smith's? (complete player???)  Seems White was more productive across the board.  Maybe you think the SB champion factory NFC East of the mid 80's to early 90's had lesser talent than the laughable AFC Least during that period?  

    Bear in mind that the Bills usually played with a lead, forcing the opponent into obvious passing situations.  The Eagles were always behind or in a dog fight against running teams with big O-lines, yet White still produced huge numbers of sacks.  Look up the Eagles seasons, scores, etc. if you're still a skeptic.

×
×
  • Create New...