Jump to content

syhuang

Community Member
  • Posts

    1,424
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by syhuang

  1. But nobody has the right data since that would require 100% perfect knowledge of every franchise.  Hence no discussion is allowed in syhuanville.

    688476[/snapback]

    Then why based on any incorrect data to make claims? You are welcome to express your opinions, but using incorrect data to back your arguments is simply stupid.

  2. I used it to get a consensus that Whitner was not project very high and probably would have been available if we traded down.  I've seen little to refute that.

    688462[/snapback]

     

    Consensus doesn't mean correctness, this is the second time I tell you this. NFL draft is not a beauty contest, consensus means nothing.

  3. Nice use of the English language.

     

    Must I provide a bunch of links showing Williams projected higher than Bush and Young projected higher than Lienart?  :)

    688444[/snapback]

     

    No, what you did wrong is to use merely Six mock drafts to claim Whitner would be drafted after #15.

     

    Now, you seem to understand that using mock drafts to justify real draft picks is stupid and keep quiet. :doh:

  4. I understand it just fine.  I simply disagree with it.  I also think restating it, 4 pages into the discussion is rather redundant.

     

    See, you still don't understand it by using mock drafts in your arguments.

     

    If we were all sheople and simply accepted everything the Bills said without any dissention, this board would be pretty boring.

    688431[/snapback]

     

    No, no one just simply accepted what other said. People have their own judgement. Some people are smart enought not to base on mock drafts to justify real draft picks. :doh::)

  5. I appreciate their efforts.  At least they can back up their beliefs.  All you seem to do is espouse vacuous drivel.

    It's better than what you did. My claim has been proved, but yours don't. :)

     

    We should do away with unprofessional opinions.  Then there would be no purpose for this board.

    688425[/snapback]

    No problem, I didn't take any of your posts seriously and just treat them as jokes. :D:lol:

     

    And you don't have anything to say about using mock drafts to compare NFL draft to America Idiol? :):doh: See, an instance example to show your point is a joke. :lol::lol:

  6. So its incumbent upon me to prove your point?

     

    Did you prove any of your points?

     

    My point has been proved by others. And your claim is wrong.

     

    To get a consensus on where one might expect particular athletes to be taken?  As a point of general conversation?

    688403[/snapback]

     

    Consensus doesn't mean correctness. None of the mock drafts was done by real football scouts or based on real draft boards. In other words, it's just unprofessional opinions. :):doh:

     

    Do you think NFL draft is a beauty contest or America Idiol where consensus is important? :lol::lol::lol::)

  7. I know how to use google just fine.  I used it to come across a number of mock drafts that had flat out refuted your claim that

     

    I claimed there're more than one mock draft have Whitner at #8, how many links of mock drafts were listed in this thread to confirm it?

     

    refute? How many mock drafts did you go through? Six (see your previous post). Just SIX!!

     

    And you think you know how to google. :)

     

    What's the pont to use few mock drafts to make any conclusion? and what the hell do you use mock draft to justify real draft picks? Is any of them based on the real draft boards?

  8. Why don't you simply provide me the links?

    688343[/snapback]

     

    Do you save all the links to the mock drafts you ever saw? Is it so hard to learn how to use google?

     

    Also, what's the point to use mock drafts to justify the picks? is any of the mock drafts written by real pro-football scouts? Do they really have access to the draft boards of all teams?

  9. There are a ton of mock drafts out there.  Obviously I did not see the one with Whitner going at 8 until the link was posted here.  Even in that draft the author states that the Bills are in no mans land and are the most logical team to trade up or down.

    688330[/snapback]

     

    There're more than one mock draft having Whitner at #8, do more "googling" and you'll find more.

  10. How do you know Whitner would have been gone?  What would have prevented the Bills from trading down to 15, then trading back up to 11 or so and still banking an extra pick out of the deal?

    688326[/snapback]

     

    How do you know Whitner would still be available at either 11 or 15? None of the TSW members were at the war rooms and had no idea what'd happen. This is all about the "risk" and Marv & co decided to take less risk to draft a player they really like.

  11. I just did a google search on mock drafts to look at some of them.  Granted I only looked at 6 of them, but in 4 of them, Vince Young was gone before Lienart and they were 50/50 regarding  Mario Williams and Reggie Bush. 

     

    Whitner was projected somewhere between 18 and 31.

    688260[/snapback]

     

    interesting, most of the mock drafts I saw had Bush went to #1 overall.

     

    Aslo , it seems like you miss the mock drafts which had Whiter at #8.

  12. Brushback First Round Draft Analysis     

     

    8  S Donte Whitner  Ohio State  JR

    The Bills did a good job selecting someone who isn’t that good, so they don’t have to pay him millions of dollars and put up with his cocky attitude.

    685921[/snapback]

     

     

    Whitner is cocky?

×
×
  • Create New...