JDHillFan

I know how the use of “VICTIM” in a tweet got you spun up over something that isn’t actually happening, but maybe it’s your guys that are to blame. Note the ALL CAPS redaction. but the scare quotes

I’ve seen this level of brilliance several times along the way. You should contact the people at this place and let them know they have been wasting their time. https://innocenceproject.org/

Are you taking what Epstein has to say as gospel?

Nice work, lady

The black dude dropping his head to the table at the 00:35 mark is all of us.

The column is not in any way about “Christians” real or faux, or Christianity, with or without scare quotes. You are just being an assh*le with that bit. Situation normal.

Dems would have found a way to release this nugget pre-election if it had any weight. It just happens to be making the rounds immediately after dems sh^t all over themselves and the rest of the country over the last seven weeks. Shocking.

Absolutely not. They learned their lesson when the Russian hookers/golden shower bit didn’t gain much traction. They would never again go down a road of that sort.

Weird stuff. Hopefully the old goof doesn’t blow it for Vance. Not putting any money on that.

This is in a first place tie for your all-time best post. It seems like you are disappointed that dems ended the Trump-Epstein shutdown. How does that work?

You don’t want to risk getting caught, slim as those chances appear to be. Best to start practicing a new stride.

Why so spineless?

Unlike the redhawk’s boy, the repellent Tim Kaine, Lurch actually put people over politics and party. Good for him and it would be nice if each side had more than one like him.

You were right all along! Now that’s a shocker!

CBS did a “bad edit” of a Kamala interview a little over a year ago. The esteemed barrister @The Frankish Reich deemed it a nothing burger. Turned out to be a $15M nothing burger but I’m sure he’s still right with his analysis of the matter.

Weak. Redhawk-level weak. I know that’s hurtful but you did it to yourself.

I noticed you had no comments on the link I provided from a US government agency. Seems like it would have been a good chance to beef up your “junk science” claim. Now this paper from the U of Dundee, published in 2017, is “the best” you can find? What makes it the best? Are you even trying? You have moved from “junk science” to a “primer for courts” published 8 years ago. Let’s just agree that, even though you won’t say it, we both want this Maga bomber brought to justice.

There’s no conspiracy regarding not hauling this person in. It’s a simple fact. It has yet to happen. I’m dissatisfied that there is a Maga bomber roaming free. Can’t believe you are OK with it.

I just can’t believe the Biden administration did not move heaven and earth to bring this person to justice. They seemingly found every other granny that acted out that day. Hard to believe they couldn’t come up with anything related to the cell phone usage of the perp. Almost as hard to believe is you getting upset over the possibility there could be a lead in the case. Junk science! In the AI era no less. Have you ever made a post indicating that you want this person brought to justice?

I’m waiting for your treatise on the “junk science” aspect of it. I imagine it’s going to be a very long wait. You should also consider fine-tuning your reading discernment. I have offered no opinion on the validity of the current claims being made by Beck and crew. Just laughing at your reaction to it. You believe the bomber is a bad maga person, right? Let’s hope he/she/they see justice. I know from prior comments that you believe the J6ers will rot in hell. Same hopes for the bomber?

“So proud of my guy for putting people over politics after seven weeks!” - the unaware dumbass once known as Redhawk

Because it’s bullsh*t. Conspiracy theories are a business these days. The purveyors rely on people like you. looking forward to your Trump-related response and something about pedo worshipers. Sigh.

It’s really bizarre. Frankish would rather call something he knows nothing about “junk science” rather than see someone brought to justice. For no other reason than politics. Weird stuff.

I would be very interested in hearing how it’s “junk science”. My suspicion is that you have the same level of knowledge about it as you do about mental fitness and Canadian Mennonites. Since you fancy yourself an expert would you have any interest in rebutting the content of this document? It’s quite old but I’m sure you have been dabbling in the field for a while. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3925574/

Like I said, I love this kind of “thinking”.