Jump to content

Prospector

Community Member
  • Posts

    1,124
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Prospector

  1. 12 minutes ago, Buffalo716 said:

    Davante Adams didn't play 16 games

     

    His yards per game was higher than diggs

    oh, that's your angle... we are caught up now

    12 minutes ago, Buffalo716 said:

    Davante Adams didn't play 16 games

     

    His yards per game was higher than diggs

    So should Beasley's passing accuracy be higher than Allens, because he's 100% for a TD last year (in games that he threw a football)? 

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Eyeroll 1
  2. 3 hours ago, dave mcbride said:

    I have been very critical of Beasley, but I take issue with your argument here. In the US, the terms "majority" and "minority" are not always tied to race. In fact, nearly the entire Bill of Rights is about protecting minority rights from majorities--in ways not really related to race at all. It's a discourse that runs deep in American politics, and people who are very religious (and Beasley seems to be very religious) are very invested in protecting minority religious rights and talk about it all of the time. Not surprisingly, the issue of majorities vs. minorities distinct from race is one of the dominant themes in US constitutional law. Beasley may have had race in mind when he wrote this, but it's just as plausible that he was thinking about the concept in its Bill-of-Rights sense. And seeing "minorities" and "majorities" in this way is hardly rare or obscure in American life. It literally comes up all of the time in law and politics. Whole American colonies were started by religious minorities fleeing majorities. 

    This is an amazing and well articulated response! I couldn't have said better, and would probably have been suspended in the process! nicely done!

    • Thank you (+1) 1
  3. 1 minute ago, BillStime said:


    Exactly - go do your own research. 
     

    The Trump Org and properties benefited significantly off tax dollars.

     

    State Department signals it will keep most details of its spending at Trump’s properties hidden until after election

     

    Get outta here 

     

     

     

     

    Where is your China Joe research?! LMFAO!!! can you be a bigger joke?! probably not

    • Like (+1) 1
  4. 2 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

     

    This is a common misconception.  Medicare is not socialist.  Its is a one payer system for people over the age of 65.  Part A, B, C, and D.  Under a socialist system providers would work for the government.  They do not work for the government in the US healthcare system model.  Unlike national health care models in other countries. 

    They are private practices or groups that service patients from other payers, commercial, Medicaid, private payer as well as accepting Medicare patients.  Government Medicare generally covers 80% of charges and some people over 65 choose to pay for Medicare Advantage coverage out-of-pocket to cover their 20% patient responsibility amount.  Some income qualifications may allow people over 65 to be covered by various State sponsored supplemental insurance.  By definition if it was socialist it would be "free". 

     

      

    So quick question... has it been going bankrupt, and/or un sustainable?

×
×
  • Create New...