Mikie2times

anybody check the link out?

Your right about people seeing what they want to see, I guess that’s why I was so skeptical before. In almost every peace of so called evidence you would have to be trying to interpret it as paranormal for it to even resemble that form. It seems like the paranormal is becoming more and more popular, and subsequently more "sightings" have been spotted. Out of all those so called sightings none of it was convincing enough for me to believe until the one I just saw. It really was chilling to see that figure shown on the thermal video, and for them to be unable to debunk it. By the way if people want to check out the thermal video here is the link Go to Exclusive Case Files on the upper right hand side You need quicktime to view it.

My girlfriend is pretty interested in the paranormal so I usually end up watching most of those ghost shows on the various networks. I tend to look at things on the scientific side, and without ever witnessing any paranormal activity all I had to go on was eyewitness testimony, and other questionable evidence. Some of the evidence looked like it had some merit, but for me to make the leap from non believer to believer I would need to see something pretty concrete. Yesterday we watched a show we often do called Ghost Hunters. IMO it has the most credibility of the paranormal shows because these people actually try and disprove evidence. They believe in ghosts, but at the same time they know they can only advance this way of thinking if they can produce evidence that holds up in the scientific community. I've seen a couple of things that looked questionable on the show before, but still was yet to be sold on the idea that ghosts exists. I was watching last nights show and it completely changed my beliefs on the subject. One of the methods they use to find paranormal activity is a thermal camera. They were using the thermal camera on last nights show and as they paned to a row of lockers in this basement you could clearly see a man wearing a hat. It was obvious to me the first time but when they rewound the film it was even more startling. You could see the outline of his body perfectly, and could even make out the clothes he was wearing. The staff of the hotel said the ghost down in that area was a guard, and by the look on the thermal it appeared like he was wearing that type of outfit. After they captured the image they paned back and the man was gone, but the number 2 which was painted on the locker was radiating heat. They tested all type of reflection theories, and did several other shots of the locker with thermal never picking up an image, and in each shot the number 2 never radiated heat. So after years of not believing I have finally witnessed solid enough evidence to believe the contrary. I was just wondering how other people felt, and if you don’t believe what would it take to convince you otherwise?

damn..rest in peace RP

I would like them also but perhaps with a slight change. Back in week one my girlfriend started to mock the grazing Buffalo, and it didn't bother me much because I liked it for historic reasons. I may not be old enough to have watched the Bills play in those uniforms but I'm a NFL history nut, and watched plenty of highlights with those uniforms on. I know the legends that put those uniforms on and how they brought Buffalo it's only championships. That said the grazing Buffalo just doesn't offer much appeal to those that don't know Buffalo's history. Perhaps they could incorporate the more active Bills logo while keeping the uniforms, and look the same. I think the white helmet in this link would be a good starting point. Looks similar to the helmets the electric company used to dawn. I also think a slightly modified version of these would have more appeal to new fans. Thoughts? Edit: Maybe make the base of the Buffalo on the helmet red, with the middle streaking part of the logo white, and keep it large like it is in the link.

Julian Peterson would probably be the best comparison to make as he also plays OLB. He tore his Achilles last year in SF, and has returned this year to start every game. Achilles injuries are pretty severe, even more severe then torn knee ligaments. Takeo has shown outstanding durability throughout his career so I imagine he is a quick healer, and will probably be ready by next season, but he probably won't be 100% at that point. If he ever does return to 100% it will probably be a little further down the line in 2007 perhaps.

The notables include Wayne, Givens, Randell-El, and Joe Jeravicious (sp?). Anything past that and your looking at a Veteran fill in, and if Moulds leaves we will need more then that to take his place.

oops, changed that

The Bills are a 4-8 team that seems to be coming apart at the seems right now, and despite the struggles they have still played an easy enough schedule to own the draft tiebreakers over the current top 20 picks. A couple weeks ago I tried to convince myself that home field will really make a difference for the Broncos, but how on earth do we stop the run? Then we have to play @CIN with Pittsburgh nipping at their heals, that smells like the SD massacre all over again. If this team still had something to play for I would give them a much better chance against NE this weekend, but I just don't see a huge response coming. We didn’t always see the Bills best effort in big games, so I’m just not all that confident they will come to play with only pride at stake. As for your records and scenarios I have it being pretty close to that, here is a rough estimate of our likely draft position with different records. Keep in mind we should win all tiebreakers which could make the difference of several spots if things get log jammed. 4-12 Best Case #3, Worst Case #5-----------0 Wins 5-11 Best Case #8, Worst Case #10----------1 Win 6-10 Best Case #11, Worst Case #13---------2 Wins

The Jets were a team I went out on a limb with but even with Bollinger I can still see them winning 2 more. I don't expect Oakland to be that motivated this weekend, and that’s how upsets happen when you got an away favorite. Then you have them going on the road to Miami, and Miami's play has been up and down all season. Rosenfield may have lit us up but he was horrible in his first start in Cleveland, and it's unlikely his success against us carries over. I agree that the Jets game should be the one we have the best shot in, but with two teams out of contention it probably comes down to who wants it more. I see the Bills losing the next three as a real possibility, and it potentially being Herms last game as Jets coach. If those two things end up playing out it would be hard to imagine the Bills bringing the same intensity as the Jets, especially on the road.

Thanks Pete Let me also add that some people have said the Jets/Bills game could have a huge impact on the draft order, and yes that theory would make sense. Is it a huge stretch for the Bills to get beat by NE, DEN, and CIN? I just don't think it is, and if the Jets win one out of OAK, @MIA, or NE we could be looking at the Bills/Jets loser being as high as 3, while the winner could drop to 10th or worse.

Including Buffalo 11 teams in the NFL are 4-8 or worse, and as this night mere of a season wears down some of us tend to think draft more and more. The following is a look at the future schedules of the teams 4-8 or worse, the current SOS which is used to break up ties, and the predicted final record. Next to the strength of schedule % is also the words, higher, lower or same, this is just indicating if the SOS will be on the rise or fall from its current number by seasons end. I can't tell what the exact number will be without doing some serious work, but we can get a pretty close idea by comparing the team’s schedules. I took a lot of things into account for the predictions, so if you feel they might be off feel free to ask why I made that prediction. Current Draft Order 1. Houston 1-11 (@Tennessee, Arizona, Jacksonville, @ San Francisco) Current SOS: .604 Lower Predicted 2-14 2. Green Bay 2-10 (DET, @BALT, CHI, SEA) Current SOS: .549 Same Predicted 4-12 3. San Francisco 2-10 (@SEA, @JACK, @STL, HOU) Current SOS: .563 Same Predicted: 3-13 4. N.Y. Jets 2-10 (OAK, @MIA, NE, BUF) Current SOS: .563 Lower Predicted: 4-12 5. New Orleans 3-9 (@ATL, ,CAR, DET, @TB) Current SOS: .507 Higher Predicted: 4-12 6. Tennessee 3-9 (HOU, SEA, @MIA, @ JACKSONVILLE) Current SOS: .507 Same Predicted: 4-12 7. Buffalo 4-8 (NE, DEN, @CIN, @NYJ) Current SOS: .465 Higher Predicted: 4-12 8. Cleveland 4-8 (@CIN, @OAK, PITT, BALT) Current SOS: .500 Same Predicted: 5-11 9. Baltimore 4-8 (@DEN, GB, MIN, @CLE) Current SOS: .528 Lower Predicted: 6-10 10. Arizona 4-8 (WASH, @HOU, PHIL, @IND) Current SOS: .514 Lower Predicted: 6-10 11. Detroit 4-8 (@GB, CIN, @NO, @PITT) Current SOS: .535 Same Predicted: 4-12 12. Oakland 4-8 (@NYJ, CLE, @DEN, NYG) Current SOS: .542 Predicted: 5-11 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Predicted Final Draft Order only taking into account teams on the previous list 1. Houston--- 2-14 2. SF--------- 3-13 3. BUF------- 4-12 4. TEN-------- 4-12 5. NO--------- 4-12 6. DET-------- 4-12 7. NYJ---------4-12 8. GB--------- 4-12 9. CLE-------- 5-11 10. OAK------- 5-11 11. ARI--------6-10 12. BALT-------6-10

To be exact Bills pick 7th as of now

It will probably be without Wayne, Edge, or Mathis in 2006, but a win at the RCA dome isn't very likely.

H---------A MIA-----MIA NE------NE NYJ------NYJ JAGS----HOU TEN------IND GB-------CHI MIN------DET KC-------BAL This is how the schedule shapes up for 2006. PLEASE don't turn this into a TD, MM, or player debate; all I'm saying is schedule looks manageable next year if we make the right moves. Just trying to stay positive

I've returned kicks but that certainly doesn't give me the knowledge of what it’s like at the NFL level. Nobody is saying he doesn't have a difficult job on kick and punt returns, but isn't it still fair for us to compare Roscoe to how our other return men have done? Roscoe has impressive numbers, but how many solid return men have we shown in the last two years? MaGee, Clements, and Fast Freddy have all shown a strong ability to return kicks. Clements could leave that picture, and you would still have two more then capable return men. I'm trying to go by what I witnessed Roscoe do on the field, and how he escapes from defenders. That element of his game has left me unimpressed and it looks a lot like a player we already have in Fast Freddy. Time will tell I guess

How does development influence the speed, acceleration, and agility of a WR? Those things may increase slightly but I doubt he got neglected in training when he played at the U. All the players you listed showed the raw ability that just needed to benefit from experience. IMO Roscoe doesn't look like he has the raw ability to make up for his size, so the benefit of experience won't really matter as much as it did for Reed, Moulds, etc.

Good Post

First let me say that I made a pretty bold statement about Roscoe Parrish in the NFL. I don't like to judge draft picks early, but what I'm discussing is directly involved with Roscoe’s ability to succeed in the NFL. At his size if he doesn’t have elite explosiveness then he might not be able to cut in this league. Roscoe starts and stops quickly, and makes quick cuts, but never reaches the top end speed to make him a serious threat. On one of his returns today a Miami LB literally chased him down. I mean I expected a Terrance MaGee like player with some offensive skills, what we have is a smaller, slower, version with an uncanny ability of letting the turf make the tackle. One more thing I didn’t like hearing was a casual joke by the announcers about Roscoe’s experience in cold weather. It may sound funny but does he have any idea just how bad it can get in Buffalo? I lived in Michigan my whole life and the cold still bites me in the ass, and Buffalo gets it even worse.

I don’t, in fact I didn't even look into who was available after Roscoe. Just commenting on how I perceived his play so far.

Is intelligence what you call completely changing the topic of this thread? I'm commenting on what I see in a player the Bills drafted, are people allowed do that anymore without having to give a list of 20 alternatives less then a year after the draft? I just don't see him making an impact, if you do explain why, if not save your opinion on what is or isn't an intelligent thread oh holy one.

I don't see him running circles around anybody. He's made some straight ahead returns on punts and kickoffs that offered hardly anymore impact then his predecessors. I'm not questioning his toughness; I'm questioning how he can end up being a good find for us at that size if he is anything less then electrifying with the ball.

It's more about the aura of the Bills. They have dedicated blue collar fans that can truly appreciate success because fair weather is about the worst thing somebody can be. The journey will be more difficult for us, but in the end victory will be that much sweeter. Throw all that in with one of the toughest winter stadiums to play at in the NFL, and they have a unique relationship with the city they play in. You might move them and still have success on the field, or financially, but they would lose the aura that makes some of us such die hard fans.

I don't have any connections to Buffalo but I still couldn't be a fan if they moved. Some times it's the fans that make the team, Buffalo is certainly an example of that.

I see strong acceleration and agility with low top end speed. If that’s the case he could be an ok slot, I was just hoping he had a little faster top gear. Also if this is the case wouldn’t somebody else be better suited on return? I thought Fast Freddy or Nate are better return threats then Roscoe.