Backintheday544

For decades? Proof?

Yea, easily. I’m sorry you lack the comprehension skills that come with more finite political conversation. Ill put into the black and white you right wingers like. You break the law, you face the consequences. Stop. End. That’s it. These are people that know the law and are violating it.

are you pro or anti law? Do you think people can just pick and choose which laws they want to obey? Why don’t you support the blue?

Thank you for posting this in a thread of “The American Media Should Not Be Trusted”. Great to Post some American media that’s on point with the topic!

This post will not get a ton of replies that it should. We don’t want a king. The only explanation is every Republican is a c u c k

Huh? A bi-partisan, yet both parties, are investigating this. It’s important for the nation and it’s one thing both parties are saying let’s investigate this. We saw Republicans say they investigated Benghazi to mess up Hilary running for President. Let’s not forget all the Trump rallies where they chanted lock her up. The fact you say Trump didn’t pursue Hilary because he had more important things makes you sound like someone who doesnt know what they’re talking about.

And therefore is the law of the land and violating such law leads to……

Ok… I did.. it said you dont know what you’re talking about.

“The politicians have been ignoring subpoenas for decades.” which ones? It’s been decade so you’ll have a ton of examples.

And Supreme Courts job is to interpret the Constitution…. Soooooooooo

There is a bi-partisan investigation into possible treason. What the F you talking about. You don’t show up when Congress calls you, you can and should go to jail. It is pro-law. It’s the law that Congress can call you to testify. Not testifying is breaking that law. Or are you the Republican that likes to pick and choose the parts of the Constitution they want to adhere to?

https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/24.2-1004/ That’s VAs voter fraud laws. They don’t seem to cover attempts. Perhaps VA should now redesign their laws to cover attempts such as this. Trying to vote when not eligible shouldn’t be punished. Trying to vote when knowing you’re not eligible should be. Here the second time he tried to vote he definitely knew he wasn’t eligible to vote. We literally have a person trying to vote when not eligible. Republicans have been saying we need to stop this stuff. Why can’t a single Republican in this thread call the guy out? Not even call out… just don’t defend him.

And should face the consequences of such wrong doing right? This is what this thread is about. Guy did wrong. Punish appropriately.

That’s not the subject of this thread. The thread was about Youngkins kid. Why are you right wing people so against saying his kid did wrong. He went to vote when he knew he couldn’t. Got rejected. Then when definitely knowing he couldn’t vote since he was already rejected, tried to vote again.

Guy tried to vote. Was told he couldn’t vote. Went back and tried to vote again. If he was a Democrat that was told he couldn’t vote then went back hours later and tried again what would you call that?

Are you pro-voter fraud or anti-voter fraud? Heres a clear case of voter fraud. Make your stance.

I don’t even know what you’re talking about anymore. Are you pro-voter fraud or anti-voter fraud? If you’re anti-voter fraud why you defending this guy?

It’s not even ignorance. He went once and was told he couldn’t vote. Then went again.

Why do you keep ignoring the fact that the guy tried to break the law. Ok so maybe he went the first time and didn’t know he was underage. But after he was told he couldn’t vote, he came back and tried to vote again.

No… “The incident was reported in notes from Jennifer Canty, who was identified as the chief of the precinct at the Great Falls Library in Great Falls, Virginia. Canty wrote in her notes that at 9:30 a.m. on Election Day, a "17 yo voter came in requested ballot" but was "told he had to be 18 yo to vote today." Canty writes that she offered him a voter registration but "he declined." Canty goes on to write that the "same 17 yo voter... came back to request a ballot" around 10:00 a.m. It was here that Canty writes down Youngkin's name. "Again offered opportunity to register. He declined if he wouldn't be able to vote today," she wrote.“ Maybe he doesn’t understand no means no?

Freedom of the press isn’t freedom to break the law.

Yea and it’s getting old and ragged. It needs replacing and improving. This bill does that.

The crux from the OP is we found voter fraud and it’s this specific guy. Looks like a class 1 misdemeanor: https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/24.2-1004/ Class 1 misdemeanors are the most serious misdemeanors in Virginia. A Class 1 misdemeanor is punishable by up to 12 months in jail, a fine of up to $2,500, or both. So since he tried doing it twice I don’t see why we don’t go for 12 months in jail and a fine of $2,500. I mean his dad is governor so maybe he will get off easy but as a Republican and personal responsibility you’d hate to see him get a break due to his daddy.

Why are you defending a person breaking the law? He was told no once and went to do it again. Can you point me to an exemption in the law if they do it for Project Veritsas. For the party of personal responsibility you don’t seem to think this person should be responsible for his breaking the law.

He takes about state rights… don’t think he proves or disproved anything. The crux of the matter is this person committed voter fraud. Not once but twice. He should be thrown in prison for trying to undermine our democracy. Do you think he shouldn’t be? Do you think he shouldn’t be responsible for the decisions that he makes?