Jump to content

Don Otreply

Community Member
  • Posts

    11,370
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Don Otreply

  1. 43 minutes ago, Logic said:

    I remain pessimistic about a full season happening.

    I stick with my position that the season will be started, but will not get the chance to finish.



     

    Very likely, unless these young millionaires self quarantine, use masks when out in public etc, etc their is little chance the season even starts let alone finishes. A serious outbreak in only one team will very likely end the season. Its sucks for sure, and the damn virus is already spiking again in at least a dozen states, and that’s not counting the rest of the world.  This sh-t ain’t over by a long shot. 
     

    Positive thoughts friends, with huge amount of responsible behavior and a giant portion of good luck we will see some football.  ? 
     

    Go Bills!!!

    • Like (+1) 2
  2. 1 minute ago, Rockinon said:

    BLM has a big following because people assume the name is exactly what it stands for. It doesn't. It is not a movement. It is a corporation that collects money for the democrat party. Go ahead and make a donation. You are directed to ActBlue. This is another corporation, a superpac, that takes in huge money for the democrat party. Everyone listed on their board of directors is white. No one knows who heads BLM themselves. That is kept secret. But if you want to donate to that cause go for it. The only thing you'll be doing is sending money to the democrat political party.  None of which has anything to do with actual black lives.

    So are you saying that makes it okay to continue the blatant injustice and racism?  Or is it all just fake news in your eyes, What truly is your point? Asking for a friend...

  3. 33 minutes ago, Heavy Kevi said:

     

    Again I really agree with you on most points, but let me put forth myself as an example because I'm curious to see what you think about it.

     

    I own a small bbq restaurant and bar in Geneva NY. I haven't "made it" by any means and like many restaurants right now we are fighting for our lives. I don't mean to sound like I am in a dire situation, I am hopeful when we open back up (this Tuesday), we will be busy and at least keep the books in the black long enough for everything to get back to some semblance of normal.

     

    So, say one of my employees wants to make a radical political stands at work. They are not doing it in a way that stops them from doing their job, but thanks to the hundreds of people that come through each day, they get decent exposure of their radical beliefs (whatever they may be), and "furthers the cause". Sounds ok right? They aren't interrupting their work, after all.

     

    Consider this- that political stands has a chance to (however severely) negatively effect my business. Maybe I lose some business, maybe because covid has already weakened our stance, my business doesn't survive (again no matter how likely). The employee really has nothing at stake other than a chance of losing their job, where I have the chance of losing everything. So basically allowing my employees to make political stands at work could cause me to lose everything.

     

    I only pose this because the "business" many people speak of in a negative light are huge corporations, but in actuality more Americans are employed by small businesses. I'm a regular person that grew up poor, in an area of poor socioeconomic status- certainly not some elite, and I know I'm not the only business owner that, despite popular belief, doesn't have a huge bank account or nice things. Truth be told, my wait staff makes more money than me every single day. I don't resent that, I'm happy to provide viable jobs, but I don't think any business should ever be on the line because of political beliefs held by someone it gainfully employs.

    It is a serious conundrum to be sure, I would be of the opinion that if an employee is doing harm to their co- workers well being or their employer who is in turn doing no harm to others in their business dealings then that hypothetical person is the problem, and should be let go, but on the other hand if said person does their protesting away from work, and even if their employer dislikes it,  that person should not be punished for exercising their rights, again if they do their job well. Having been the manager of a small business for many years I understand your point. 
     

    You are correct that it is the large corporations that are the ones most likely to abuse others through their business dealings, this is where greed and power abuses show there ugly heads most frequently. That is where regulation of capitalism is most appropriate and needed.  
     

    I have no problem with folk creating and having wealth, I do however have a problem with those individuals or entities that allow greed and power lust to purposefully restrict others from that opportunity.
     

    Being a good neighbor as an individual or business is a necessity if one holds having a great society as a priority, which I do. I truly understand that perfect is not gonna happen, but doing ones best to not be part of the problem is alway desirable. 
     

  4. 37 minutes ago, Heavy Kevi said:

     

    100% agree with the sentiment of your post, but this is not a constitutional matter, and I think it just gets in the way to argue that. These players are on the clock, and getting paid for their time (very handsomely). Obviously if the NFL is cool with it then it's a non-issue, but the 1st amendment doesn't really play here.

     

    I mean, sure they "have the right" to do it, but the NFL "has the right" to sanction, penalize, or fire them for it. Obviously they won't do that though. It was easy when it was just kaep, now it's half the league or more. So now, even though this isn't a constitutional matter, I think it's more closely likened to a strike. The league can't really live without all the star players, so they have to deal with it.

     

    Thank you for your service!

    I Appreciate your sentiments, and I thank you,  it was a privilege to serve my country.

     

     The owners of our country, yes us citizens, in effect have no constitutional rights if government or business entities can thwart them when ever they feel inclined. The playing field is not level. 

     

    Capitalism brings many rewards, and is mostly a good thing,  but greed and power (capitalism’s twin evils) need to be properly regulated for the common good of everyone. Presently the greed and power aspects are out of hand, and those two things are the root cause of our current social unrest. 
     

     

    • Like (+1) 1
  5. It would appear JJ Watt and others have a mature understanding of what constitutional rights mean, and that protesting injustice and blatant racism during the national anthem is what Americans call standing  up for the true ideals of America. 
     

    Those that would try to twist doing so into an affront to our brave and honored service members current and former are perpetuating a known falsehood and acting in an UN AMERICAN way, and should give considered thought as to why they would purposefully continue to push this falsehood, that can only further divided our country.
     

     As a former United States Marine I find this abhorrent self serving behavior reprehensible. Nations unfriendly to our Democratic Republic use this thinking to drive a wedge into the very social fabric of our Great and honorable Nation, it must stop. 
     

    Semper FI America!!!
     

     

    • Awesome! (+1) 3
    • Thank you (+1) 3
  6. 11 minutes ago, Beast said:


    No, what you are is intolerant to how other people feel.  Values are not governed. Not by you. Not by me.

     

    I served as well.

    Feel? How about the truth of the matter?  American citizens exercising their constitutional rights is not and never has been an insult to we who served. Again, the flag does not and never has represented the military, the flag represents the constitution and the social values of our country, that in turn the military is sworn to and oath bound to protect, end of story. Your or my feelings do not come into play on this.  That  you “feel” otherwise is unfortunate and bears introspection on your behalf. Nothin but luv, and thank you for your service to our great country. 
    Semper FI. 

  7. 1 hour ago, Beast said:

     

    You are 100% correct.

     

    You know what else is 100% correct? People are allowed to feel that kneeling during the Anthem is disgusting and a slap in the face to people that have served, and served and died while serving.

     

    It goes both ways. 

    I’m one of those people who served, (USMC) and it is not a slap in the face, the flag  does not represent the military, it represents the constitution and the social values of our country, that in turn the military is sworn to protect. Any one who thinks otherwise is willfully ignorant. This I had been a straw man argument/red herring from the very get go. 
     

    Go Bills!!! 

    • Like (+1) 3
    • Awesome! (+1) 3
    • Thank you (+1) 1
  8. 7 minutes ago, NewEra said:

    Yup.  He was targeted 50 times and dropped 10 passes.  That’s 1 out of 5 passes.  20% of his targets ended in a drop.  


    Edelman led the league with 13.  He was targeted 153 times. 3 times the targets, only 3 more drops.  Gallup was 2nd with 11 drops.... on 113 targets. Running back Tarik Cohen had 1 less drop than Knox....on 104 targets. 
     

    The Bills as a team attempted 513 passes and had 26 drops.  Knox had 38% of the teams drops and under 10% of the total targets.

     

    I don’t think people realize how atrocious his drop rate was.  I love the kid and think he has a great future, but he won’t last long if he continues to drop 20% of his targets.

     


     

    Dude, it was a Sesame Street reference... ?

    • Haha (+1) 1
  9. To me, the cops that quit there jobs in defense of those that in effect beat up an old guy and left him bleeding from his head on the pavement  are not worthy of the trust of the population they are employed by and are supposedly there to serve and protect. They are  punks, and should be publicly shamed by the people of Buffalo. The police are not there to enforce the laws, that’s the court systems job, the police are there to apprehend criminals, not beat them up or kill them. 

  10. 7 minutes ago, ScottLaw said:

    I think it’s really a pointless discussion... having enough arm strength in the league is all that matters.... arm strength means zippo if your not accurate with it. 

    Allen’s arm strength has helped him out on multiple occasions, completing many tight window passes throughout the season, in fact it’s part of why the got the team to the playoffs. This ranking is quite accurate. It will be higher in a few months of course....

     

    Go Bills!!!

×
×
  • Create New...