daz28

Again, again, again, again, which has nothing to do(is unrelated) with what Mike Johnson is doing.

This has truly ran across several tracks, and has run its course.

Like I said, the smoke around Biden is always real, but when its Republicans, it's fake news. This is all about your bias, and that's about it. Here's what went down in real time in case you forgot, even though I have no idea why I'm letting you draw me so far off topic(well I do have an idea lol): the US Central Intelligence Agency had concluded that bin Salman had ordered the murder.[1] In the same month, the United States levelled sanctions against 17 Saudis over the murder, but did not sanction bin Salman himself.[16] President Donald Trump disputed the CIA assessment, expressed support for bin Salman, and stated that the investigation into Khashoggi's death had to continue Now, I'm not sure you understand a lot about business, but tell me if this is plausible: bin Salman: "remember that real estate kid, who was somehow the Middle East envoy, that was really tough on us at every turn? Well, I liked his ties, and I think we ought to invest billions with him. Even though making a little bit of money from his business is absolute chump change to us. I'd like to invest in his company anyways." Because you love me repeating myself so much, I'll keep doing it for you: I don't know if/what the quid pro quo was, but I'm also not naive. So you're saying the GOP is/should be sitting on evidence of misdoings, while allowing a crooked Biden to stay in power, because the election is 11 months away? And that's fine?? Maybe it's just easier to admit that they're allegations at this point.

If the accusations against Joe weren't just allegations, do you think the GOP would have voted on impeachment yet????????? Only in your head has anything been proven yet.

You do realize half of what helps identify grainy/distant video is things like gait and demeanor. If you're suggesting they block out everything, except those distant, grainy faces, then you'd be investigating every guy calling saying, "I dunno that kinda looks like Bill down the street" on his Facebook page. Anyways, like I've already said(again again), this is about what Mike Johnson is doing, not how the FBI is finding suspects. You may as well be asking me why some people like sprinkles

LOL, I don't know if maybe you're used to speed reading, so you skip words, but I already said this was about the perception of it(especially yours), and that I wasn't claiming anything. While the rest of the woke world is overdoing it with pancake syrup and the likes, I don't think working with murderers qualifies as woke. Just so you know, you know as much about whether that $2B was politically leveraged as me or the man on the moon does. To think that he got that money for being extremely tough on them politically is laughable. That's the nature of business relations, not some conspiracy stuff/unproven allegations that I heard about.

That's an allegation by you, and you know nothing about what kind of parent he is. I'm 100% certain this is heartbreaking for him to have this happen to the only son he has left. The guys been through tragedy you could never understand, but it seems you'd prefer not to even try to. I don't care if you like his son that you don't even know, but as a human this is sad. That's also "reality".

Maybe you could make a "how to parent bigly" video, that he can watch and learn from. Bro, that's just harsh, because the guy has already lost a son.

I'm believe I mentioned this like 3x already: security. Why don't we reveal all of the security cameras/footage from schools and banks while we're already out doing incredibly dumb things.

Tbf, that was probably what was supposed to happen at that time. Now I'd like to know the reasoning behind that original sweetheart deal he was offered. Weiss is Trump's guy, which is weird. We're lucky that the judge and prosecutor questioned it, or he'd have gotten wayyy less than anyone else would have. That deal also only had 2 misdemeanors, and one felony. Maybe foreign agent charges this time? Hmmm

Ok, now do we wait for the trial, or do we claim this is a politically driven case engineered by the radical, right maga DOJ, who's trying to destroy Joe's campaign in 2024 on our social media site? 🤣😉 Edit: I forgot to add, whose christo-fascist agenda that is destroying our country(we won't have one anymoar) !!!!!!!!!

Well, I guess Gymbo now knows why they didn't want morgan and Daly deposed about an ongoing investigation. It's almost like a gym teacher, who sees the deep state in his toast, should learn something about how investigations, prosecutions, and evidence works. But I want the cookie NOW!

I didn't claim anything, I was pointing out the perception of it, which you may or may not have been ignoring, because you appear to not like when Hunter Biden is doing it. ie I was testing to see if you have a preferred 'side' when it comes to justice. Personally, I don't want the Bidens OR Trumps doing it. As for going after political rivals, are you referring to the Trump administration investigating Trump/Russia, or the Biden administration investigating Hunter??? Oh, you must mean the 'deep state', so you can just assign any nonsense unproven conspiracy garbage whenever it's convenient. Also, it seems convenient of you to say the investigation into Kushner was legit, and done properly, that found nothing, but claim in different investigations the democrats are unfair, lying, and corrupt. It's called picking and choosing for your own benefit, and it's a bad look. Just try to just stick to the facts that you can prove.

No what's worst is running the clock out on a subpoena until you're in power, and then thinking subpoenas are somehow legit once again, because now you're the party handing them out. This ain't a matter of who sucks more, it's a matter of who's withholding the truth, and using nefarious means to skirt the laws. NONE of them are above the law, including Eric Holder, if you think for some strange reason I was thinking he should be, even though I have zero clues as to why you might be thinking that.

I don't have a "side", so showing me what one side did wrong to justify the other side doing it wrong holds no water with me. Wrong is always wrong. Not sure why I have to repeat myself.

What we are discussing here is the 14th Amendment, Section 3, not a codified US law. They are two completely different things. If you don't believe me, then ask the guy who got arrested for having a handgun even after he showed the officer, the prosecutor, and the judge the 2nd Amendment. I know there's a lot of people who still want to claim that an insurrection never happened, but those with their eyes and dictionaries open disagree. If you absolutely require a legal statute, I already gave you seditious conspiracy, which clearly overlaps with insurrection. Here's the actual charge: The particular charge against these defendants is that two or more of them knowingly conspired to use violence to prevent or hinder the execution of federal law-Again, only a blind person watched the videos, and didn't see any "violence to prevent or hinder the execution of federal law". I'm not claiming Mike Johnson committed any crimes, I'm claiming he violated the Constitution, which would bar him from holding office. I'd also note that the penal code you listed is actually undefined. If you'd like another chance to show the actual defined statute, I'd love to see it.

I'm not going to run in circles with you, but I'll try one more time. I haven't seen anything anywhere stating that the DOJ/FBI has identified everyone that was involved, and neither has Mike Johnson, which is why he's blurring the faces. What you're saying about the FBI having access is irrelevant to what MJ did or is doing. He LITERALLY said he's doing it to protect people who haven't YET BEEN IDENTIFIED, and charged. Hmmm, do you think maybe they could if the tapes were public, and someone watching recognized someone who's face wasn't blurred out??? I'm pretty sure Mike Johnson and the rest of the sane people that don't make silly arguments do, too.

I call it the Jamal Khashoggi fund, but in case you missed it he got a $2B investment from the murdering Saudi family. Just so you can't be coy about the appearance this has, I'll leave you a quote: "The Committee is concerned by your decision to solicit billions of dollars from the Saudi government immediately following your significant involvement in shaping U.S.-Saudi relations," Maloney said, adding that Kushner's close relationship with the crown prince as well as his pro-Saudi positions during the Trump administration and the Saudi government's funding "create the appearance of a quid pro quo for your foreign policy work during the Trump Administration." He already answered in a post to me that it would not. Also, the Republicans did promise to provide a transcript of the closed-door hearings, which does provide some transparency(as long as it doesn't look like the Mueller report). I think they realize reading isn't big with the cult, so they could pick and choose their talking points, and the zombies would run with it, whereas if it were live, they'd watch the whole thing and order pizza. ...and yes, the hypocrisy is pure gold.

No, I'm not suggesting anything. I'm clearly saying and repeating exactly what Mike Johnson himself said, that he's waiting to release the tapes until after he can conceal the faces, so that the public watching the videos can't identify and report to the DOJ the people that the FBI has been unable to identify/locate.

He is concealing the identity of people who were alongside the people who have already been convicted of seditious conspiracy for the sole purpose of evading justice. I would imagine any attempt to keep them free/hidden would include comfort, not just simply hiding them in your basement/attic.

If your basing that on the emails from Schwerin, I'd hold off on that, because Fox is portraying him as Hunter's business partner/financier, but from what I've read Joe has known him for over 20 years, and also has had his own dealing with him. The timing of the emails is suspicious, but the information surrounding that is still also unknown. I'll definitely have the popcorn out, although it is bittersweet, because I have little hope that even if proven it won't curb the corruption in DC. Maybe Joe should have put Hunter's wife in charge of the Middle East, instead. I'm sure billions of dollars in influence weren't sold there, and if they were it was done in the open so as not to arouse any suspicions. Besides, why would an energy company have any interest in hiring lawyers?? 😉

It's not shaming, it's pointing out he's out of his league. Just like they'd have no chance with him in a matter concerning irrigation. Heck, I'll admit I'd make a lousy prosecutor/investigator, because I know nothing about it, and that's hard to do as an American, because 30 minutes of YouTube usually counts as an expert. Also, I'm pretty much only discussing the money laundering/bribery part, not the income tax/gun matters, which I think Hunter pretty much already admitted to, and can/will plead the 5th to. I think if you polled the people, you'd get a very high percentage wanting a public hearing, because it gives the appearance of transparency, which we rarely get. If he's not forthcoming, ie he lies, then he faces perjury. Something that he, unlike 5 House GOP Reps, doesn't appear to be afraid of.

Which means nothing if you don't understand the reasons why. Even the DOJ and the Republican committee aren't as sure as you what happened, and I'm certain they have 100k times the info/data you have. You're simply playing the role of the TBD Elise Stefanik wannabe, and I have zero interest in being the counter to that. If you want me to say there's smoke, then ok, there's smoke. I'm interested where the allegations go, and rather than it be a gotcha moment for me, I'd look at it sadly as another sad moment for my country. I'd be willing to bet a property deed that there's smoke ALL OVER Washington, and I wouldn't want any of 'my side' protected. To me, the absolute saddest part of it all is that the only smoke you're ever going to hear about is smoke from the side who's currently not in power. Well, what may be sadder is that this partisanship is escalating, and is dividing us as a nation.

I want the truth as much as any democrat hating person does. I'm no shill for anyone, and that's what makes me stay away from, for the most part, a very clearly polarized forum. I'm not convinced the Trump/Mueller investigation was handled properly, and I'm even less optimistic this will be. Also, defying subpoenas to conceal "the truth" seems to be the norm, with no repercussions depending on who now holds the gavel. A VERY CLEAR indications of politics and not "truth".

Yeah, the committee that grandstands EVERY SINGLE DAY, now doesn't want grandstanding. Explain how the hearing being public would conceal "the truth", because I can explain very quickly why a behind closed doors hearing could conceal it. Could it be a guy with a BS in agriculture doesn't want to be made to look the fool talking to actual lawyers???