daz28

I'm curious to know, and unlike your like-minded board members, I'm also curious to know if it's indeed a fact, and why I haven't been provided any substantial facts to support those ALLEGATIONS(that I don't simply wish were true). Just so you're aware, dividing people into groups is PRECISELY what 'they' want you to be doing so diligently. I'm also curious if you have any comments based around my actual post, and not just this ad hoc attempt to try to label me. You know, like maybe if you think this is political??

Can you imagine those unqualified clowns, who've been smearing Hunter(the crackhead) for years, being completely owned by him(a lawyer), and his legal team? I can, and I think they can imagine it, too. Anyone who objectively watched it would conclude that the crackhead should probably have their jobs. There's a reason why people rarely testify on their own behalf, and that's because they know the lawyers are smarter and better at the game. This is literally the same thing, but in reverse. If Comer had real evidence, there would be a comprehensive list of it all over his social media pages, but for some strange reason(hmmm), they like to instead make allegations across select media sources. It's almost like this is, gasp, purely political.

So the answer to the million dollar question of why this shouldn't be done in public for all Americans to see is because Democrats did it the wrong way before??? ....or GOP Reps. Jim Jordan of Ohio, Scott Perry of Pennsylvania, Andy Biggs of Arizona, Mo Brooks of Alabama, and House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy him???

This has already been covered. There are security concerns, much akin to why we don't give guided tours of Fort Knox. So let's again ask why their faces are being concealed, and the answer was already plainly and clearly cited, "to protect them(the insurrectionist) from the DOJ". This poses a new question for those who actually read and follow the Constitution, does this disqualify Mike Johnson(et al involved). Section 3 Disqualification from Holding Office: No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or GIVEN AID OR COMFORT to the enemies thereof. If you have no argument against this, a simple laughing emoji will suffice.

He questioned the election 2 years BEFORE the election. It was the plan ALL ALONG, and anyone would have to be a fool to not see that. They also KNEW that the Pence/Fake elector plot was BS, but they tried it anyways: “Respectfully, it was gravely, gravely irresponsible for you to entice the President with an academic theory that had no legal viability, and that you well know we would lose before any judge who heard and decided the case. And if the courts declined to hear it, I suppose it could only be decided in the streets. The knowing amplification of that theory through numerous surrogates, whipping large numbers of people into a frenzy over something with no chance of ever attaining legal force through actual process of law, has led us to where we are.”

Do you or Mr. Benson Johnson know what the definition of colluding is?? Ironically, he uses the correct word, "coordination" afterward. If anyone needs a brush up on what collusion means, they can simply google, 'Manafort' or 'Flynn'.

He LITERALLY says, "to not be charged by the DOJ", so even if your 'theory' is correct, that's not what his public statement said. This is as clear a case of obstruction of justice as could possibly be presented, and claiming that the DOJ has other copies doesn't matter, because his intent is CLEAR. Also, why does his doctrine of "Let the American people see, and make up their own minds" not apply to Hunter Biden testifying publicly???

I thought you could only spike the ball in the endzone?

The one thing we don't want is the Ravens to be resting everyone vs the Dolphins. We need that to be an important game for them.

That's why the chicken little is overblown. if the D was bad, I'd be throwing in the hat, too. The McD stuff is a little overblown, because tonight was mostly execution, and other than practice plays, he can't do anything about that on gameday, especially on offense.

ESPN was supposed to go to it, and they never did. WTH

It was Trevon, and he added some dumb emoji's. If he wants to eat the cap hit, and give us a couple first rounders, then ok. otherwise he can sthu

Sean, Von's toast, why keep putting him out there when you have AJ, Groot, and his buddy from LA: "we'll trust the process, he's working his way back instead of resting the injury.'

McD on the podium after this commercial. This should be interesting. I'm sure we won't hear anything about the process, which is likely now over.

Ed Oliver. The only real positive.

$31m dead cap

It's not excusable, but there is a man assigned the job of counting players. I think it was Bernard. Now, the coach may have not had time to remind him, but he still should have tried counting them from the sidelines. Not sure he did or could have.

Maybe he has a future in coaching wrastling.

Bernard never counted his men

JUST TERRIBLE. A NEW DEFINITION FOR BILLSY

Why force your kicker to hurry. Dummy

Yay the NFL underthrow bs play

Yeah baby. Just literally forced them back by will alone.

Tight coverage McDougiie

How Russ used to cook