daz28

Maybe you can get Fox to run a segment on how factual posters like Daz28 are destroying PPP. "YOU WON'T HAVE A FORUM ANYMORE!" Peace out.

There were 1.6 million of them last year, so shouldn't be hard to track down someone who can explain it to you. I've seen the border patrol trucks around the Niagara river, maybe stop one of them and ask them.

I forgot you guys have the rare ability to not call something that it calls itself. I guess based on perception, that there might not have been a STOP THE STEAL rally there. That no speech took place, and that no one was pressuring Mike Pence to KNOWINGLY break the law. It's not my fault you only listen to MAGA fake news, and have become a fladulent because of it. I wasn' the one pretending they weren't there for a reason. I honestly hate playing the "what about them" game, when I know I'm wrong. You should try it sometime.

I'm assuming it's the 1st Amendment for more reasons than just being numerically listed: It also protects the right to peaceful protest and to petition the government THAT'S why there are protestors there, Adolph Stalin.

Like I said, it wasn't an insult, but you chose to take it that way, so that's on you. Anyways, how it affects one industry, that you're familiar with, doesn't mean you understand how it affects thousands of other industries. That's why I said it's a complex mixed bag. I'm not claiming to know much about it myself. In fact, kind of admitting I don't know much other than some people say it hurt their business, while others have said it helped. I can't see why them lying about it would benefit them I didn't give him anymore credit than that he can read and comprehend text. I'll bet if he tried really hard, he could read and understand, but pretend not to, when it's convenient for him.

This is about the bill supposedly "letting 5000 in/day", which is complete nonsense. It's 5000 ENCOUNTERS. I'm not talking about apprehensions and what happens after that, just that the 5000 encounters is being intentionally mischaracterized. As for what you were saying though, yes that is insanity.

Why were the protestors there that day? Let's just ignore that they had a purpose, and attempted to actually do what they were there to do. If BLM said, we're going to go downtown, and steal everything, would it be looting or "just a riot". The fact they have a cause, and then things happen INCIDENTALLY is a riot. Ridiculous.

History, and people who are ignorant of it, willfully or not. Tibs had no problem understanding the gist of it.

They got you right where they want you. Don't think, just post dumb lies. If you "encounter' someone in the woods, and escort them off your property, it's NOT the same thing as "letting them in". You jokers really have a horrible view of what letting someone in means. When someone breaks down a barrier(or door), it's NOT the same as letting them in. LOL

A guy just went on a political rant with his father's head literally cut off in a plastic bag. I don't think there's many things that anyone can do worse to illustrate what ridiculous, dangerous political times were living in. The BS has to stop, and reasonable, sensible discussions have to resume.

I wouldn't call it getting around it, I'd call it a breach of the 1st Amendment. Too bad the ones investigating it are the same ones doing it. Again, both sides, and take our country back. If the oligarchy wasn't in their pockets, this likely isn't happening at all.

Maybe Kamala will find the strength to do the right thing. If not, maybe Biden can just sit and watch what "things happen when an election is unceremoniously stolen". Thanks for finally admitting that if the Democrats do it, it's wrong and an actual insurrection. Too bad yoy can't admit that when trump does EXACTLY this, it's a peaceful protest. BUNCH OF CLOWNS!

Israel just "retaliated". Isn't it now their duty to go home, and not let things "spiral"? It's such a shame I can't put a "coherent" debate together. LOL

When it's the governments doings, it is censorship, and it's wrong. The small amount we've seen has been more bi-partisan than you're claiming, though. When a private company, or anyone else does it, it shouldn't be called censorship in the legal, politically driven sense. The media doesn't even count, because they're just selling lies and manipulation. Anyone who is consuming that is the actually problem, not the silencing part. It's each person's own obligation to not be swindled. A personal responsibility.

Ok Chamberlain. Peace in our time. Wave that treaty around, bud. You terrorize my country or my family, and I'm coming for you. Spirals be damned.

I just think you're using the word "censor" poorly. That's pretty common right now, though. It's become a politically charged term.

You have openly used your voice(your influence) to support attacks on Americans by terrorist, because of some retaliation doctrine you're holding onto. You did this on a public forum(your power). The tariffs are a mixed bag of good and bad. Like most things, it's more complex than the average internet poster understands. That's not meant to be some kind of insult to you personally, btw

I think they know how it works, and they're perfectly fine with it. There may come a day when someone calls them a fascist, and they'll turn around and finally smugly admit it, and say, "yeah, but what are you going to do about it". Most Americans aren't smart enough to see this, but I'd hope Supreme Court justices are. People are basically championing clear threats to our democracy, and they will eventually find out that it was a horribly bad idea. These people do not understand that history is basically dramatic mathematics. This plus this gets you this EVERY TIME.

Agreed, but lets celebrate the free part, while still shunning the dumb part. I'm well versed in the Bund, and it was scary. They were trying to take over America. Worse than the KKK.

it's a scam for sure, but it's part of the world economic game. All we can control is our response to it, and soft leaders, who are in the pockets of the oligarchy isn't a good one. Step one to actually making America great again would be getting OUR government back. Getting rid of citizens united and the Washington lobby would be a great first start to achieve that goal.

There ya go champ, let it all out. Maybe you're not 100% Jimmy Carter Chamberlain. **** our enemies. Now if I can just get you to stop letting them retaliate, and harm American soldiers, we'll be getting somewhere.

History. Like I said, I could list dictators that it was a horrible idea to give a pulpit to, but I figured everyone already knew who they were. I can't stress enough how Tucker has the right, but good sense should tell him it's not a good idea. Money and popularity are the worst reasons possible to do it. Would it have been absurd if a journalist went to Japan to ask them why they bombed Pearl harbor? It's amazing that the same people who DESPISE Jane Fonda for her pro-Vietnam stance, are the same ones who are proponents of Tucker. Again, this is so absurd to me, that I should just recuse myself from the discussion if i don't seem to be getting anywhere.

Some of the arguments are practically saying, FAFO if the seal team 6 theory works, and we'll deal with that after the fact. If your party refuses to punish the president, then it's a fair, sound legal strategy. heck why not go the full 9 yards, and say they have full immunity from all crimes after their terms to almost ensure that they could not only do it, but do it without any chance whatsoever of repercussion. I don't think anyone is fully grasping the significance of what is happening right now. Trumps attorney LITERALLY threw that example out there, and the SC is basically saying, yeah I guess that could happen, and be perfectly legal and safe from their standpoint. Well leave the future of our country in the hands of a political party. This has already been done in Nazi Germany, and how'd that work out????

No free speech should continue, but the consequences of using it should be heavily weighed. People can do lots of things legally that are really bad ideas. The fact that Tucker is getting good publicity for doing something really stupid is proof that free speech has consequences that can be good for some, but really bad for others.

I'm talking about Putin invading Ukraine, but yeah, terrorism is worse than naked aggression, and requires an even stronger response, which they aren't entitled to retaliate, and cause American casualties. Sheesh. Are you pro-terrorism now? Comparing giving airtime with American right wingers vs Hitler death squads is quite the stretch. I can't believe anyone would consider American journalists not giving Hitler a platform from which to defend genocide to be "censorship". Again, it's not and shouldn't be illegal, but just a really, really stupid idea.