daz28

These expulsions: “They did not discuss anything having to do with the United States’ decision to expel diplomats or impose censure against Russia,” Pence said during a Jan. 15 appearance on CBS “Face the Nation.

I think Flynn lied, you don't. We'll have to agree to disagree. I gave you the quotes of the lie. As I said, I'm not gonna go round and round about the same thing over and over. Maybe they are swampy, but all they did was agree with what everyone else found: Tuesday’s report falls in line with a January 2017 assessment produced by the CIA, FBI, National Security Agency and others. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/apr/21/senate-intelligence-committee-affirms-russian-inte/

Do you know more than the Senate intel committee? Is that what you're claiming?

I'm not going to run in circles with you

I didn't deny that. If I did would you kindly show me where?

Look I get that you're trying to tie the lie to the bigger picture, and again that's certainly debatable, too. All I'm saying is that trying to change the semantics of the lie doesn't change the lie

You couldn't have worded this as any more of an assumption than you just did, so kudos for that. I can just as easily reverse it, and say why are you so hell bent on letting Russian election interference slide. As I said, the reasoning why he did what he did is up for debate, but that's for another day. How you snuck China in there is a real head scratcher.

You can't spin direct quotes, but you can misinterpret them, which is what you did. He word for word asked to refrain from escalation. I don't care if you want to try to redefine words to suit your narrative.

I gave you a link to the whole transcript. Not leaning partisan, just following the facts. Partisan would be to ignore them. Or worse yet use semantics to alter them.

Try again: 'The President’s authority to exercise power begins immediately upon being sworn into office and continues until he is no longer the officeholder' https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL34722.pdf

Ok he avoided a nuclear conflict. Got it. What tweet(s) did you develop that deflection from? I know a lot of you have your heels dug in too deep to even attempt to pull them out now, but I'm not going to ignore the facts no matter what semantics or unrealistic rationales are used. For what it's worth, I agree that his reasoning is surely debatable, but that's a different topic altogether. There's a link to the entire transcript here: https://thefederalist.com/2020/05/29/declassified-flynn-transcripts-contradict-key-mueller-claims-against-flynn/

I'm not wrong. I get why he did it, but it doesn't change the fact.

He is specifically discussing undermining the current president's policy towards Russia. Go ahead, laugh again, because once again I'm stating what is absolutely the truth no matter what you think of it.

“I really don’t want us to get into a situation where we’re going, you know, where we do this and then you do something bigger, and then you know, everybody’s got to go back and forth". That is literally what “refrain from escalating” means. Keep the echo chamber going though.

Bro I love ya, and I love your positivity, but 85k Americans said no. There's no way we learned anything about a novel virus in 6 months. You might be right about some things, but ya might be dead wrong, too.

Explain to me why a one sided echo chamber puppet like yourself deserves one, but someone who thinks for themselves doesn't? Having you all do the rat parade down main street is EXACTLY what they want you to do.

Isolating and keeping the sick in quarantine is the key. If you don't you're spinning the wheel of Covid. No one knows what this thing is capable of.

It might literally infect almost everyone as you said, but lets say it infects only half of us for arguments sake. Then let's say 50% of those are asymptomatic, and hopefully develop antibodies, and we go with 1% mortality. Fair enough numbers, right. That's 875, 000 deaths. That smashes almost 4 years of World War 2 deaths by 5 times in months, not years. Will we reach that total? Likely not, but social distancing may have been what kept those numbers from becoming real. Are we in a position to say 200k deaths isn't realistic? I'm not so sure. If we can handle 4 or 5 years of world war, we can handle a few more weeks of lockdown. At 85k deaths in 2 months, the "it's only a flu" clueless crew need to stfu, an put their mask on. I wish people would stop waving the flag, because it won't make this go away, nor will it make anything better.

Are you literally the walking unconscious? If he says he's taking the role, then he's the boss. He did but didn't mean it??? That's derangement syndrome in a nutshell.

He gets 5 likes for not answering the question. That's perfect for any community that thinks Obama is Satan. Real talk, right? We don't hate Obama, we just despise him. Trump??? well he's kinda the savior. He's like if Rand Paul had a pair. He's gonna save us. I just know it

You actually never said which right you were afraid of losing, or why you think it would be permanent. That was my initial question before you spun like literally 10 times. Please answer the question: which rights are you afraid that' Covid is going to permanently take from you???

For Christs sake man, they give you the answer. A Fourth Amendment "seizure" occurs when a vehicle is stopped at a checkpoint That comes from the Supreme Court not me, Those are their words, not mine, They clearly admit that a stop is an illegal seizure.... BUTTTTTTT HILLARYYYYY(well actually DWI) In real life they established that the illegal seizure WAS REASONABLE. BUTTTTT MYYYY RIGGGHTTSSSSS. NEVER EVER GIVE UP A RIGHT CUZ SOME DAYZ A COVIDZ Obama MIGHT GET YOU. Sorry but the theatrics are for Mr DR who you all hold in high esteem for being disingenuous. He wouldn't know a TRUE RIGHT if both of them slapped him in the nose in the heat of passion.

I told you what he did. He took responsibility. He shouldn't have, but when he screws up that's your guys out. Musta been someone else's fault. He fired the oversight on the spot with no reason. That was idiotic Speaking of idiotic, do you think interns in Washington can write a bill in a few days that will cover what the 10k top corporate lawyers in the world can't dissect in a few days? Are you sure the guidelines were specific enough? Are you sure about how long it takes to cook those grits...My cousin Vinny

What was the correct decision to make? Or are you just gonna play both sides, plus the conspiracy side. Straight up tell me what you feel he should have done that wouldn't have screwed himself?

At some point maybe you'll understand there's less reason to think they can pull an illegal seizure on every car on the highway, because one of them might be drunk, than there is to test one person who may be carrying a virus that might kill 2 in 100 people. Keep in mind that one person who had this on Nov 17th in China has turned into 4.3 million people worldwide. If the Supreme Court feels DWI is that big of a public threat, then I have no idea why you think the courts might shoot down the Coronavirus as too much of an intrusion on privacy. I'd love to meet the lawyer who thinks he can argue that precedent. Good luck