Jump to content

Aussie Joe

Community Member
  • Posts

    12,226
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Aussie Joe

  1. 1 minute ago, Luxy312 said:

     

    Not entirely true.  A post-June 1 trade would free up $4.5m this year.  None the less, they would still be eating the remaining $4.5m in dead money this year.  Notwithstanding all of that, the OP is a special kind of stupid.  Dallas could sign Julius Thomas, Martellus Bennett, Brent Celek, Antonio Gates, among a bunch of others without giving up anything.  One aging TE is just as good as any other.

     

    OK- but the $4.5 Mil they “save” this year is just being pushed to next year right?

  2. 5 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

    I understand that’s it’s cute to flame on the OP for the idea but the Bills front office has already traded away far more valuable assets than Charles Clay. I’ve got no idea why everyone is drawing a line in the sand at one of the traditionally least used ‘weapons’ in the Bills offensive arsenal.

     

    They are on the hook for his Cap costs this year so trading him would make zero sense..

     

    It doesn’t free up any salary cap space that they could use to acquire another player... 

    • Like (+1) 1
  3. 26 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

     

    Marino's critique was not over the top, yet look at some of the posts that sought to discredit him and his analysis that points to exactly what I'm referring to. 

     

    The OP is using Marino’s opinion of Allen to help him justify his criticism of the Bills draft choice, yet also wants to  pretend that other similar analysts didn’t have a more favourable rating of Allen..

     

    Marino is entitled to his opinion but I don’t think his analysis of this draft class should be put on a pedestal... as I posted earlier he did have Darnold at number 48 on his board..

    • Like (+1) 1
  4. 20 minutes ago, OldTimer1960 said:

    We look forward to your condemnation if Allen doesn’t pan out.

     

    My level of condemnation will be mild compared to most here....

     

     

    1 hour ago, Sky Diver said:

     

    Not sure how Beane would have outsmarted himself. He preferred Allen over Rosen.

     

    Whether he was right remains to be seen. If he was wrong, will it be a career buster? I don’t think so. No GM is ever 100% right and he didn’t give up enough that will cripple the franchise.

     

    We will have to wait and see what happens but I think the majority would say that Rosen would have been  the safer option and Allen the higher ceiling lower floor type.

     

    In my observations, GM’s tend to get blamed when they take the riskier option and it doesn’t turn out.

     

    Of course if he ultimately gets it right he will be a genius..

  5. Seems like a very smart guy...

     

    I think he is a great fit for McDermott with his maturity, team first attitude and work ethic...

     

    The Bills had this guy much higher than bottom of the 3rd in my view, and he was someone I was keeping tabs on during the last month or so pre draft....

     

    I've got an inkling that they might have used one of their second rounders or 65 on him if they kept them...

     

    They must have been sweating on each selection after it got past 80... I know I was..

  6. A lot of these experts are crying about the two second rounders that they used to trade up to 7....

     

    Plenty of pre draft mocks I saw had them trading up to 4 or 5 to pick Allen giving up both first rounders and more...

     

    It appears that these guys are fixated on them giving up too much to get to 7, but would have been happy to give up more to get to 4 or 5 for the SAME player...

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...