YesPlayoffs

Because Paxton Lynch is ten times the prospect that Peterman is. It's not rocket science. So you advocate the benching and tossing aside of a multiple-year starting quarterback for having one miserable game?

You could also say that he gives us the best chance to win games. Now I know you're in favor of tanking for a top 8 pick to get a Super Bowl caliber quarterback (a strategy that's only worked once in the last 20 years - Peyton). But I'd rather see a team out there trying to win rather than cross my fingers and hope for something that happens once in a generation. My apologies. I mixed you up with the other guy. I'll go outside and practice punting stones right now.

That was your comparison, not his. You said you'd rather have a turnover a game than 10 less yards. It's an opinion that zero NFL people would support. Have fun with that.

Meh...that's just your opinion. We all know how much that is worth.

Not when you're getting over 30 more yards per game on the ground (TT 37 rushing yards per game for the Bills - Siemian 6 rushing yards per game for Denver).

Then you really don't know anything about football. Preventing turnovers and preserving field position is faaaaar more important that an extra 40 yards of passing per game.

Literally nothing you posted had anything to do with what I posted. Nice job.

I'm comparing downfield passing attempts...I thought it was pretty clear. If you can't understand that, I don't know how to help you. I mean, it makes sense that you don't understand, but it is what it is.

And for the record, compare his passing charts to noted "gunslinger" Drew Brees when it comes to throwing downfield. Not too much difference when it comes to downfield passing. But I guess all you guys don't want Brees either since he checks down often. https://nextgenstats.nfl.com/charts/player/drew-brees/BRE229498

Here's his passing charts. There's really no significant difference between last week and most previous weeks. Yes, in some games the passing is focused within 20 yards (Jets in particular), but for the most part, his passing profile matches the second half of the Chargers game. Sorry to ruin your narrative. https://nextgenstats.nfl.com/charts/player/tyrod-taylor/TAY764868

He's been doing that all season. It's absurd to think otherwise.

Last game, TT played exactly the same way he has been doing all season. There was no difference. It just that now, people who can't admit they were horrendously wrong about Peterman are trying to move to a narrative that somehow the benching "fixed" Tyrod. That's just a way for people to try and salvage a silver lining from their dumb opinions. Just admit you were wrong.

Irrelevant. We have a first round pick no matter what and I expect us to use it on a QB wherever it may fall. However, you are advocating tanking for a top 8 pick. That implies that you think picks 1 to 8 are where the hardware winning guys get taken. I was simply stating that Super Bowl winning quarterbacks mostly come from outside of that range.

FWIW, there are seven active quarterbacks who have won a Super Bowl. Only one of them (Eli) was drafted in the top 8.

It hasn't stopped people from judging poor Tyrod when he plays on the exact same "inadequate" team.

Other than a missed field goal, the Chargers scored on every single first half drive last week. The week before, the only thing that stopped the Saints from scoring on every single first half drive was a fumble and an end-of-the half kneeldown. Against the Jets, yes they scored 24 in the second half, but that was after a first half where TOP was close to 50/50 in the first half and we only had one three and out. I don't think your hypothesis holds any weight. The defense is just bad...it really hasn't had anything to do with the offense the last three weeks.

Quarterbacks who have a 1/1 TD/Int ratio are quickly replaced in today's NFL. This isn't the 80's.

LOL. Starting Peterman last week made it look like the coach has no idea what he's doing. You're wanting him to double down on stupidity?

What makes you think that? As if it isn't obvious.

If one drop by a receiver is enough to turn Peterman into a drooling interception machine, then he has no business being on a NFL field. Then you didn't watch the game.

Here's the problem with that...if we go get a great QB prospect, he's going to have to play in this garbage offense with no protection when he gets here. It's a lot harder to develop potential when you've got nothing to work with. Fix the other issues first to give a young guy a stable environment. That's the only way this is going to work.

That's because they see Brady and think, "That's all we need! A Hall of Fame quarterback!" without any understanding that finding one is a crapshoot. They also don't understand that Brady is successful because he has a brilliant head coach who builds schemes to suit his players' talents. Even if we were fortunate enough to actually draft the next great quarterback, we still have McChuckleNuts on the sidelines. He'd end up ruining the guy anyway with his moronic coaching.

Yep. If DiMarco makes that catch, suddenly the line can block Bosa. If DiMarco makes the catch, then Peterman suddenly doesn't throw balls up for grabs with no concern over protecting the football. And suddenly the defense can stop them from scoring at will. What drugs are you on?

This is my name change. It happened the moment I heard McChuckleNuts gave up on the season by starting Peterman.

I only bet on sure things...and no, our playoff spot wasn't a sure thing. But did we have a chance? Yes. The way things are shaping up, it's looking like nine wins will get you a Wild Card spot...did we have a shot at nine wins? Absolutely. That is until McChuckleNuts decided to throw away yesterday's game.