YesPlayoffs

Prove it.

You're a complete joke. And I guess a giant racist, too. Prove that you're not.

Google says nothing that correlates to your claims. It's a straight up lie.

This was referring to the initial signing. He had offers from Denver and Buffalo...he chose Buffalo because Manning was still playing. LOL I don't need proof that it's not. That would be like me saying you don't like Tyrod simply because you're a giant racist, then making you prove that you're not or else I'm correct.

Do you have any proof? Any link? Anything that makes this something other than a message board lie? Didn't think so. You can choose to believe whatever nonsense you want, but don't say something is a fact when it didn't happen.

Completely false. It's just a message board fabrication.

They didn't pass on him...he chose Buffalo over their offer. That's not true at all.

Especially this message board

Since he arrived, we are 2-7 in games where Tyrod started and threw for over 250. 0-1 in games he threw for over 300. At the same time, we are 17-9 in games where he doesn't throw an interception. Make of that what you will.

...and an offense around him, as well.

By that measurement, TT has been a success in Buffalo. 63% completion pct, 7.2 YPA and a 3.3 TD/INT ratio for his time as a Bill.

I think Tyrod is a good stopgap until we can develop the QB of the future. More often than not, he puts us in a position to win games. What we should do is take one of the half-dozen top QB prospects with our first rounder next season and focus on improving the OL with many of our other picks in order to have proper protection for the young guy when he becomes the starter. So Tyrod starts in 2018 and when the rookie is ready, he should take over. If that happens during next season, good. If it takes more than a season for the rookie to be ready, we should offer TT a one year extension for 2019. If he takes it, then we just rinse and repeat until the rookie is ready, if the rookie is never ready, we try again later. If TT doesn't want to come back, the rookie gets a trial by fire and we'll see what we have then. Tyrod starting games and the Bills planning for the future aren't mutually exclusive options.

Yep. The TD pass to Zay was the difference.

Not really.

LOL Troll harder.

Of course they do. At least according to the brilliant brain trust that posts here.

You know who else has stats like that? Dak Prescott. Cowboys fans think he's not good enough either, I guess.

I guess you don't realize it, but the NFL is for people who try and succeed. That's why the salaries for head coaches are millions. Trying and failing shouldn't be encouraged...that's the reason for firing people. If you're fine with failure, then that's a "you" problem. I can guarantee that you don't know **** about what national analysts do.

Of course not. "Improve" is what works in the NFL...if McDip**** want to "try" and fail, he can go coach a college team.

"Try" doesn't cut it in the NFL.

LOL. You wished you had Peterman too. We all saw how knowledgeable you were as a result.

Nah...we just get garbage decisions that reek of the unprepared and inexperienced. McChuckleNuts and company don't know what in the hell their objective is, much less how to get there.

Week 1 - 16 for 28 for 224 yards and two touchdowns. 38 yards rushing. It should have been three touchdowns, but Clay let one bounce off his hands in the end zone and it was picked off. Week 3 - 20 for 26 for 213 yards and two touchdowns. No turnovers. Week 4 - 12 for 20 for 182 yards and a touchdown. No turnovers. Week 5 - 20 for 33 for 268 yards and a touchdown. 53 yards rushing on just 6 carries. No turnovers. Week 6 - 20 for 27 for 165 yards and a touchdown. Touchdown run, as well. No turnovers. If you don't consider his play as having a lot to do with those wins, you're either clueless or a troll.

It took less than 30 seconds. https://milehighsports.com/the-time-is-now-for-paxton-lynch-following-the-loss-to-the-bengals/ LOL. That officially put you into the "knows zero about football" camp.

Let me spell it out slowly for you. Siemian being benched wasn't much of a story because the Broncos have a young, former first round pick waiting in the wings...it doesn't matter if he was benched for Osweiler because neither of them are the Bronco's future. That's why Lynch is starting this week...it was inevitable. No one had any notion that Siemian was going to be the long term starter. Meanwhile, we have a fifth rounder with a ceiling of career backup replacing a two year starter that everyone outside of Buffalo thinks is solid. If you can't understand why one makes news and the other doesn't, then you're just being obtuse.