gobills1212
-
Posts
1,850 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by gobills1212
-
-
8 hours ago, baskingridgebillsfan said:
it is a joke to treat a player like this. other players will notice. this is worse then you think
How can I, or anyone else made a judgment when you arent privy to the details- let alone the actual situation... ya can't!!! So until it's known and the who what where when and why's are aparant...let's give it a rest, shall we?
-
1 hour ago, 26CornerBlitz said:
The Petermaniacs were feeling bad that Nervous Nate or Not Ready Nate or UnfortuNATE, or Putrid Peterman was being exposed by actual football analysis and critique of his meager abilities, so they shifted the subject to Taylor to deflect.
And to think, it's been less than a month since the last meaningful snap
The draft can't get here soon enough! At least it'll be nice to fill the blank in with a new name (hopefully). Maybe we get at least 3 days before he looks at someone the wrong way and the next 3 seasons are lost...
-
1 hour ago, baskingridgebillsfan said:
i agree. The grammar police use use issues as a defense to their limited ideas
are you serious? How can you have all of these people and the press show up and not have the details firmed up. This is squarely on Beane. Let's not forget there were issues in Carolina between the players and the front office. Google some of Steve Smiths comments.
I agree. This is the type of things that players remember. Why are they haggling over this. What should have been a nice day turns into a shite show
I dunno, if this gets you riled up I'd hate to see you when the Bills have a real problem..
-
Yay.. something new to discuss! Good thing no one is discussing TT and his FQB potential in any other threads..
-
31 minutes ago, Batman1876 said:
Injury guarantees are common unless your injury history includes things that are likely to reoccur. Eric’s injuries did not fit into that category. A broken leg is not reoccurring it heals and goes away. His knee injuries were not reoccurring. There was therefore no medical reason to conclude he was at an elevated risk for future injuries and as a result the standard injury guarantee was written in.
Makes sense. It amazes me how many folks seem to think foresight is 20/20 like hindsight. For the people busting the Bills balls, they must live life making 100% correct decisions...ya know... being able to see the future and all lol
-
1 hour ago, MDFan said:
I think they are actually handling this situation quite well, given the circumstances.
It amazes me, the complaining almost as if just to complain. Furthermore, of said complainers, I'd imagine they'd be hard pressed to even understand the issues at hand considering no one seems 100% what exactly the issues are and what the options to deal with them could be. Until options are established as well as a certain established high road is present to even compare the coming decisions to.... I'm not sure how anyone can dog anything...
-
Odd post for someone w the handle 'ittakestime'...
-
1
-
-
Not what I wanted to read while I sit here waiting to see if eating a red velvet donut does what I think it will do.... at least once I have the results there will be something of substance to this thread...
-
1 minute ago, transient said:
... the square root of 7?
Lol, something like that...
-
Man.. Why didn't anyone else think of that??
2 years ago there might have been a case. Now he suffers from ' if he was worth his salt why hasn't he supplanted Dalton?
I'd imagine there's only one answer...
-
Quality post.
-
I think you mistitled your post...
-
5 hours ago, Doc Brown said:
No way on Keenum or Foles. Cousins would obviously be the ideal signing. Bridgewater is intriguing, but I haven't seen him play in two years. You're taking a chance.
I agree with you, but Dennison might like his potential.
With respect, (and personally I'd rather none of the 3), but how can you say Paxton lynch and then in the same breath say no way to keenum or foles?? And please don't answer lynch has more potential based on the unknown. The grass is greener is no way to logically make an argument for a qb. It just invites arguments for mccarron or bray for that matter. With ANY of these guys the best hope/case is they find a system or coach they mesh with and you have a false positive like we had w/Fitz or MIN has w keenum...
-
9 minutes ago, Doc Brown said:
The point is whether we'll be significantly upgrading if we sign Alex Smith. Speculating how he'd play in today's game isn't a fruitless exercise when deciding what to do at QB short and long term.
I find it funny when people simply break down the point further as if it's essentially an argument. I get it... trust me... smh. Have fun with your delorian playing that one out. Don't forget to account for the wind condition. Meanwhile, looking forward to next year's season and potential playoff game might be a better use of ones time. Its over. It was a fun ride, but it is what it is. This is what 2017 was meant to be. Retool and look ahead to 2018. If not...well...maybe when the answer has been reached youll choose to go back and evaluate how the Broncos season would have played out w tyrod on the roster. At least that'll keep you busy while meaningful discussion is happening elsewhere.
-
So now it's come to trolling your own team? Yikes...
-
Who cares? Dumb... what, are we going to invite Alex in and play it again tomorrow? With all the off season story lines this is REALLY what we wanna talk about? This might take the cake for silliest topic and this thought should have stayed in the next yr qb thread. Last thing it needed was its own thread. ...
-
34 minutes ago, peterpan said:
After that pick today, it's evident Peterman just don't have the arm strength. I mean come on , he can't get the ball there on an 8 yard hitch. Move on now and don't waste anymore time.
I'm not at all a Peterman supporter and it did seem to lack juice - but as has been pointed out Thompson shlda came to the ball and it made a difference for sure. Dude has his worst game as a bill at a bad time.
-
17 minutes ago, downunderbill said:
You can interperate what I wrote however you like
I said Cousins and a rookie would be my pick, exact words.(for example, Cousins and a later round prospect), not the top QB in the draft.
At the moment we have 2 bad QBs you still need a back up. Why does NE draft QB almost every year when they have Brady.
I understand your concept and what you are saying...but if you aren't drafting a stud then you have Peterman already to grow into your backup roll. So logically, I assumed you meant drafting a stud as that's where the discussion is/was at. Either way, I understand what you are trying to convey. It's just an unrealistic take or suggestion. I don't even mean to be rude or insulting. I only commented bc it made me chuckle as it's like 'Sure- what team and fan base wouldn't like the bqba in both free agency and draft' bc then you'd hope one works out. It may even land a nice return later in the future in trade but we have enough holes that it can't be an option regardless...feasible or not...
-
23 minutes ago, downunderbill said:
He wants out of Washington in a big way. We have a lot of call room and draft picks. How is it unreasonable?
Your initial response of cousins AND a quality qb prospect from the draft made it sound like it's just so easy to do one, we should do both!! Logistics aside of having to pay THAT much for a qb, why would we sign someone paid to be a franchise guy as well as invest a pick that could be used to bolster one of the many weaknesses of this team? Draft a stud with a bridge vet or go all out for cousins. Make a choice and stick w it. You can't double down with the best of both worlds.
-
27 minutes ago, downunderbill said:
This, he doesn't seem like it popular choice but Cousins and a rookie would be my pick.
Ya... that'd be nice huh?! Ya should have thrown a mansion for yourself on the list lol. Man...
-
They don't seem to think Bills fans travel well.
They also seem to be pretty arrogant over at Duval Pride in plotting their course to the superbowl. Overlooking teams often leads to an early exit. For their sake they should hope the success does not go to the teams head as it has the fans. They don't seem to be able to handle 1 Bills fan posting. I can't imagine if more started posting. They'd lose their gords!
-
1 minute ago, Elite Poster said:
The petershit decision looms large.
Eh, it's only bc people like you want it to be a thing let alone assume they'd have won otherwise. There were MANY reasons and had other opportunities they came up a win short. But hey, if that makes you feel better - have at it
-
4
-
-
3 minutes ago, wppete said:
We are going to get to the playoffs!!!!!
Gotta be that guy huh...
Worse than the guy giving a summary 3 min later than everyone talking about it lol
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Brianmoorman4jesus said:
Anyone acting like the reason you don’t start Peterman is because we can still make the playoffs is missing it. The reason you DO start Peterman is because we can still make the playoffs. Tyrod is terrible and double on the road. We want to win the game. Peterman at least will throw the ball rather then take sack after sack. Peterman also looks to get the ball to KB. The guy is a half a foot taller then the guys covering him and Tyrod is petrified to give him the chance. Throw the !@#$ing ball son. You are a QB.
Tyrods retention level is startling. Each time I seem to think he's starting to understand that good things seem to happen when you throw to KB, he comes back the next series and seemingly forgets everything learned in the previous series. It's maddening!!!! At the very least, NP seems to fully understand the security blanket/big play potential and possabilities tossing it up to KB brings to the table.
Source: Bills all in on Peterman unless they can land Sam Darnold
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
I guess... but for what though? Craziest thing is winning makes it all go away
I guess that's what I'll look forward to. For some, even then I suppose there will be something to gripe about lol