Mikey152
-
Posts
210 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Mikey152
-
-
My favorite part about the “let us play” comment? Not only did Toney line up Offside, he also had a pretty blatant pick several yards downfield that could have been called. THAT would have been a tough call, but the right one.
quite frankly, the Chiefs play right on the edge of the rules when it comes to illegal contact. If the refs didn’t let them play, they could have had 30 penalties last night.
-
1
-
-
I went to church Sat night so I could watch the game...but they texted me in the morning saying they were short staffed (I volunteer) due to illness and I ignored it so I could watch the game. Definitely my fault.
-
1
-
-
Here's the thing...did you actually look at any of those drafts and who OTHER teams took? Sure, there are a few stars in there but man alive there are some terrible names. Like guys that have already been on multiple teams or out of the league bad.
-
2
-
-
For fun, I went back and looked at these drafts...if you think our picks are bad, you should see some of the other guys. Like, at least Epenessa and Basham play.
The year we drafted Singletary, the 5 best guys in the third round were: Singletary, Dionte Johnson (taken before our pick), Mclaurin, Mcgovern and Damien Harris...
-
1
-
-
Also ignored is draft position...for most of Mcbeane's tenure (ie all but one year) they have been a playoff team. During that same time, the Bengals were pretty bad for all but two of those seasons. It's a lot easier to be a genius if you are picking in the top 5 of every round.
-
1
-
-
29 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said:
I’m 41 and a straight male….I think I would cry if Josh Allen hugged me.44, straight, and...same
-
1
-
1
-
-
So, IMO the gold standard for two TE offense in the modern NFL was the NE patriots circa 2010-2012.
Hernandez and Gronk were both rookies in 2010. Pats went 14-2 (this was the year they got upset by Rex Ryan in the playoffs)
Brady 65.9% 3900/36/4
Welker 86/848/7
Branch 48/706/5 (11 games)
Gronk 42/546/10
Hernandez 45/563/6
They also had a 1000 yard rusher that season in Green-Ellis
In 2011, the offense went nuts. They went 13-3 and lost to the giants in the SB.
Brady 65.6% 5235/39/12
Welker 122/1569/9
Branch 51/702/5
Gronk 90/1327/17
Hernandez 79/910/7
I think the Bills can pull something in between these two seasons off...Welker=Diggs, Branch/Llyod=Davis, Gronk=Knox, Hernandez=Kincaid. Probably a stretch to expect Gronk production out of Knox, especially in 2011. That said, I do think he could catch a lot of touchdowns as the in-line TE and will probably draw some easy matchups when Kincaid is on the field. I think you could argue that the Bills players are better or at least as good at the other spots (Kincaid a projection, obviously).
What derailed the pats were injuries (2012) and crimes (duh)...Bill B has been chasing this setup at various times ever since. 2011 was one of the best offenses I have ever seen. Just filthy.
-
4 minutes ago, BruceVilanch said:
if we can even get 70% of Gronk/Hernandez I would be happy. and if we can do all that without one turning into a caveman advertising for USAA and the other doesn't turn into a murderer I'm even happier.
That year they combined for 169 catches, 2237 yards and 24 TDS.
70% of that is like 120/1600/17…yeah I’d be happy with that
-
1
-
-
This pick is a dream come true.
12 personnel is traditionally a big grouping. If you can pass effectively out of that, you are almost unstoppable. It’s like a cheat code If teams play base or big, abuse those lb. Make them play nickel and run it down their throat until they bring down the safety…then go for the dagger. And do all of that without subs, so you can change tempo whenever you want.
2007 gets the hype, but that 11/12 Pats team with Gronk and Hernandez might have been the best team offense I’ve ever seen. Bill B has been chasing it ever since.
-
2
-
-
1 hour ago, DrDawkinstein said:
If what you're saying is indeed accurate with regards to Beane going BPA true to his board, then we have major issues in the scouting department putting the big boards together. Especially looking at Basham over Humphrey.
I dont think he has gone with pure BPA as much as he, like almost every other team, goes BPA at position of need.
I think that is evidenced by Beane trading up 2 picks to get Elam in an act of semi-desperation right after watching McDuffie (his true target) go off the board and there not being many CBs with 1st round grades left. He traded up to 23 to get the best player left at a position of immediate need instead of staying at 25 and taking BPA.
Granted, none of us are in the war room and certainly not in Beane's head, so we're just guessing. But this is how the situation read to me as it played out.
BPA isn't literally ranking players from 1-300+ and picking the highest rated player on your board...
You grade players, and those grades put them into groups...usually rounds or something similar. Then, things like needs, scarcity, positional value, and even personal preference come into play. If you have 20 first round grades and you pick 25, you have a choice to make...you can either trade into the top 20 to take a first round graded player, or let it ride and hope one you need makes it to you. If you let it ride and either A) no first round guys make it or B) the guy(s) that do don't make sense for your team or C) Lots of guys are still left in that tier, then you trade back and acquire more picks whenever possible. Sometimes, you don't have a partner and you are forced to either reach or take a guy that doesn't fit your team...that's the definition of using your pick poorly.
BPA is about picking someone worthy of your draft slot...not literally picking the highest graded guy on your board.
-
Light boxes and not a lot of short yardage carries are a big reason his YPC are so high. I think the fact that when its 3rd or 4th and 2 or goal to go, they aren't giving the ball to Devin very often (and when they do he doesn't have a great track record)...that's why they aren't bringing him back.
That said, I don't think he is a bad back. He's just not what the Bills need.
-
It’s hard to take this post, and any other complainer’s post, seriously when they suggest that the Bills play a simple defense.
Their defense is pretty much the opposite of simple. Sure, they don’t have elaborate or flashy blitzes, but their zone system is incredibly complicated and constantly checking into different plays/coverages based on personnel and alignment on offense. Our back 7 are probably the best coached in the whole league.
That said…it’s unlikely this defense will just lineup and physically dominate the other team. Their players just aren’t wired like that or built like that.
so in the playoffs when it is cold and you have injuries and the best offensive minds…it’s just not a great recipe. It was especially bad this year because the team was a shell of itself both physically and emotionally.
I get everyone is upset we lost, and even more so about how we lost…but this board is just sad. I thought Bills fans were better than this.
-
2
-
-
It’s not really Andy Reid, and honestly it’s not really Travis Kelce either…he’s a great TE, but I see some people on here saying he’s just too big and too fast and that, flat out, is not the reason. Nobody wants to hear it, but it really comes down to his position and his quarterback.
First, as a position TE is almost unguardable when they play in-line because the guys lining up over him (dl and lb) are trying to tackle the guy with the ball. If they focus too much on the TE, your pass rush and run defense suffers. If you try and cover him with a CB or Safety, you expose your back end and run defense. The way to stop a good TE without sacrificing other aspects of your defense is by playing zone and getting consistent pressure that gets home.
Thats where the qb comes in. Mahomes makes teams pay if they pay too much attention to Kelce…but even more so his elusiveness and ability to buy time with his eyes downfield negates the best weapon at stopping a TE: pass rush. Mahomes abilty to threaten the whole field, combined with his ability to buy time and make plays is what makes Kelce great. With enough time, any decent TE or Rb can find space in a zone.
I will give Reid this, though…that dude is a master a scheming “legal” opi. One more reason it is tough to play man against Kelce
-
1
-
-
Am I the only one that can read the graph?
The Bills circle on the graph is significantly larger than the other teams around them in A) the standings and B) number of games missed. The fact that their circle is the same size as teams with significantly more injuries says exactly what everyone is saying...quality, not quantity, is the issue.
-
1
-
-
They also ran right at him quite effectively...
I love Jerry and wish he could have retired a Bill, but at his age and salary, it just wasn't a fit and they parted amicably.
-
4
-
-
On 10/10/2022 at 10:36 AM, Logic said:
I know, I know -- it's early, and you'll say I'm jumping the gun.
I don't care. I've seen enough: Khalil Shakir should be the starting slot receiver going forward, even when McKenzie and Crowder return to full health.
At the very least, he should be splitting reps with McKenzie and seeing more playing time than Jamison Crowder.
He runs great routes. He constantly seems to get open. He has relatively sure hands (one bad concentration drop yesterday not withstanding). He offers run-after-catch ability that this offense often lacks. He has the frame and build to withstand the tough over-the-middle work.
Aside from all of that, he just passes the eyeball test in a way that the Bills' other two slot options do not. Frankly, he looks like a star in the making.
I love McKenzie as a player and am glad he's on the roster, but has he looked like a dynamic full time slot option to anyone over the first four games? He hasn't looked that way to me. I like Crowder, too. He's a solid, dependable veteran depth option. Again, though: he doesn't seem to pop off the screen the way Shakir was.
I have figured all along that Shakir would be brought along slowly, that he'd be more of a contender for starting duties in 2023 or 2024. Given McDermott's M.O., that still may happen. I don't think it should, though. I've seen enough. He's the best option to start in the slot. The coaches always preach getting the best players on the field, regardless of tenure or pedigree. If they're true to their word, Shakir should start seeing more opportunities. I hope he does.IMO, the plan was for Shakir to play more, but he whiffed bad on a block against the Rams (I think...or Titans) that got Josh blasted and hadn't played much since. Hopefully he learned his lesson.
-
14 hours ago, Big Turk said:
I am honestly not sure how Davis keeps doing it. He only runs a 4.54 40 which is average speed for a WR and certainly not the type of speed that would make you think he has the ability to consistently take the top off a defense, but yet here we are.
Since Davis has come into the NFL, he ranks 4th with an average of 18.0 YPC. The only 3 players ahead of him are either fading players like DeSean Jackson who is currently a UFA, Henry Ruggs who is no longer playing and likely never will again, and John Ross who is a bit player and a one trick pony.
All of them are speed guys. Looking at the receivers directly after him, you have Marques Valdez-Scantling, Donovan People-Jones and Breshard Perriman. Again all speed guys...
Davis doesn't fit the mold of a deep threat but yet he is one of the best ones in the NFL and consistently gets open deep.
So my question is how?? Is he simply great at setting up CBs with moves to get them turned or to slow down and then runs by them or does he have much faster play speed than what he ran in the 40?
I don't think anyone thought when we drafted him we were getting the NFL's best deep threat(by the numbers at least...I would still pick Hill obviously if I had to have one play) but yet he has turned into the big play WR for us.
It’s because it’s not a race…only one guy knows the finish line and can even change it on the fly.
on a go route long speed, flying 20, top speed, etc are way more important than 40 time…if gabe Davis walked his route, the corner is walking too.
this is how Jerry Rice always got open…his 40 was slow, but his flying 20 (ie second 20) was elite.
-
Blue Allen
Red McCoy
Blue Stevie
Blue Takeo
Blue Kelly
Blue Thomas
Blue DeLamielleure
I also have a Josh HS jersey...
-
There are two major flaws in his logic:
1 - It was pretty clear that the 2021 Bills were sleepwalking through the middle part of the season after beating the Chiefs (and losing to to the titans the way they did), and didn't really wake up until after that first half in Tampa Bay.
2 - They are a better team this year. Josh has more experience, the offense has more speed, the o line and d line is better, and the corners are better once Tre is healthy.
-
On 4/5/2022 at 2:39 PM, billybrew1 said:
I don’t care what anybody says. He lost his world class explosion and that means he’s human now. If we can’t seriously help him with pressure in the middle, pressure from the other side, the right blitz calls, he’s going to have a hard time being an impact player.
He needs help. Only a young Von Miller or a Bruse Smith can do it alone. Groot, Epenesa and Basham need to really step up. Those new DTS WE SIGNED need to be impactful…Then and only then will Von fly….
Actually, while I wouldn't say he wasn't explosive...his jumping numbers at 246 pounds weren't world class.
What made him an elite pass-rushing prospect was his change of direction skills. His 3-cone and shuttle were better than most corners. This goes hand-in-hand with what Joe B. is saying...his balance and overall athleticism is just insane. He hasn't lost that, and it's a skill set that ages better than pure explosive guys like a Shawn Merriman.
-
If he was hurt, I doubt they would continue running those planned runs...
I think the more likely explanation is he is making a more concerted effort to throw with some touch in order to throw a more catchable ball, and it is throwing off his timing in a game situation. Probably works a lot better in 7 on 7 or against air in practice.
-
1
-
-
Here’s what I struggle with when it comes to Brady…He is not and never has been the most impressive QB in any one specific trait amongst his peers. He wasn’t the most cerebral (manning), athletic (just about anybody), accurate (Brees), strongest armed (Rodgers, Flacco, Big Ben etc). You never really watching and just think “wow”
So it’s really hard to accept him as the GOAT, for many of the same reasons he fell to the 6th round in the first place. So many guys SHOULD be better than him (and are certainly more gifted). But at the end of the day you can’t argue with results. He might not have huge strengths, but he doesn’t really have any glaring weakness either, and the one most people would agree he has (athleticism) isn’t really a prerequisite for the position in the right offense.
I guess what I am trying to say is, he has easily had the greatest career of any qb ever…maybe any football player ever. But if you were building an all time fantasy league, I’m not sure he even gets drafted. He’s a Honda Accord. When you account for styling, fit and finish, reliability and cost, probably the greatest car in history. But nobody talks about how they’re gonna but one when they get rich.
-
1
-
-
The most successful true transition (ie no college football experience), IMO, was Carlton Haselrig. He made a probowl. He and Neal (the other true wrestler only who had success in the NFL) both were heavyweights and both played guard.
-
8 minutes ago, Miyagi-Do Karate said:
Amazing when you list them out like that.
And that's not even including Alex Van Pelt! 😃
And I forgot Doleman at DE...Theyre actually tied with Miami for 5th all-time in number of HoF players...will be 11 once Fitz and Revis qualify.
https://archive.triblive.com/sports/college/pitt/pitts-all-time-team-heavy-on-hall-of-famers/
-
2
-
Traditional vs. 'Modern Day' X Receiver
in The Stadium Wall
Posted · Edited by Mikey152
Modern day? Alignment rules are alignment rules...
You need an eligible receiver on each side of the line of scrimmage. They can be close to the ball (tight) or far (split). Either way, they have to line up on scrimmage, which means they cannot be in motion at the snap and the defense can touch them immediately upon the snap...so press man is always an option for covering them. Because of those realities, you'd like your ends to be able to hold up physically.
Because tight ends play often play in line and block LB and DL, it is obvious that they should be bigger. Split Ends, on the other hand, usually only have to fight off CB so "bigger" is relative and there is probably a point where they can be too big, especially if it inhibits their explosiveness after the initial 5 yards.
Flat out, it is hard to scheme open a split end. If the defense wants to play press man, you can't really stop it. So the most valuable guys at that spot are guys that don't need a scheme to help them get open against any kind of coverage...and those guys tend to be big and fast because they need to be physical and explosive, depending on the coverage. If they aren't physical enough to get off a press, or not explosive enough to eat up a cushion, well then they can be taken away easily and your offense loses a target and that player is kind of a waste.
Side note...this is one of the underrated aspects of a two TE offense where both TE are effective pass catchers...it negates the need for a true Split end if both TE line up on the ball...the rest of you eligible receivers no longer have to and you take away their ability to press man on the outside if you want.