Jump to content

SoCal Deek

Community Member
  • Posts

    22,450
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by SoCal Deek

  1. 6 hours ago, Buffalo Barbarian said:

    Using Drafttek

     

    1. WR DK Metcalf 6'4" 225 Ole Miss

    2. OT David Edwards 6'7" 315 Wisconsin

    3. OG Chris Lyndstrom 6'3" 307 Boston College

    4. TE TJ Hockenson 6'4" 250 Iowa

    4. DT Olive Sagapolu 6'2" 345 Wisconsin

    5. DE Chase Winovich 6'3" 245 Michigan

    5. CB Rock Ya-Sin 6'2" 190 Temple

    6. OLB Ben Burr-Kiven 6'0" 221 Washington

    7. Punter Mitch Wishnowsky 6'2" 220 Utah

    7. TE Jace Sternberger 6'4" 250 Tex A&M

     

    I like it!  If for nothing more than those guys have some super interesting names. Olive? Rock? Jace? 

  2. I honestly thought this thread title was a joke. They used to say Don Shula could switch locker rooms and beat you with your roster and then switch back and beat you with his. That same thing is often suggested of Belichick. I don’t think ANYONE has ever thought about it with Adam Gase. Sheeesh!

  3. It will come down to budget. A new stadium will be more expensive than a renovated one. And a new stadium on a new downtown site will be more expensive than a new stadium built in the parking lot at Orchard Park. And a dome downtown stadium will be the most expensive of all options. Each option will be close to $200 million above the one just below it, so it’s all going to rest on the available sources of funds. Public money, Pegula (Bills) money, Fan money.

  4. 9 minutes ago, BillnutinHouston said:

     

     

    Different subject here, why are so many people in this thread referring to New Era as "Rich"?

    The serious answer is because that’s what the stadium was originally called when it first opened in 1973...and for all of us old timers it will always be Rich Stadium to us. The sarcastic answer is...really?

  5. 8 minutes ago, Shaw66 said:

    Didn't realize there were so many QBs likely to be on the move.  Just like last season.

     

    It's nice for once not to be shopping for a QB.

    Very well said. After the turmoil of the last few years, it's nice that the Bills now have three QBs under contract.  I have to wonder when was the last time we could say that in January.

  6. 25 minutes ago, apuszczalowski said:

    Having games on Monday and Thursday added to their schedule and increased TV money by adding more games to a nationally televised schedule.

    For the NFL it could cost them broadcasting money from advertisers cause a typical Saturday gives the non football fans plenty of other options of things to do.

    The biggest hit would come from Bars and restaurants who now will have an already busy day become a bit busier and lose the extra days revenue as they go back to having a dead Sunday night. If your a bar or Restaurant Owner, you probably want one of your busiest and profitable days (Saturday) to stay as is and get an extra busy day on Sunday to increase revenue for that time.

     

    As for productivity, is it any worse then say 'Cyber monday' for lost productivity? I thought that was determined to be one of the least productive days of the year. Should it become a National Holiday too?

    All good points, but I'm guessing that the vast majority of people do not watch the Super Bowl in a restaurant or bar.  In fact, I don't know anyone that does.  Most people watch at someone's house and have turned the game into a huge pot-luck binge eating fest.

  7. I've read a ton of comments on here over the years and I have to say that Super Bowl Saturday actually makes a ton of sense.  It costs nothing but solves a rather large loss of productivity challenge for millions of employees, employers and schools.  Think about it, it wasn't that long ago when there was no Thursday night football, and or even Monday night for that matter. 

    Get it done Mr. Commissioner!

  8. 3 minutes ago, OJ Tom said:

     

    All the guy did was some evaluations of the top WR's, there are plenty of other threads discussing O-line, and who should be taken where.

     

    Why not just let this discussion develop without shouting in about the O-line?

    Or we could have a thread about middle round receivers and focus on the O Line in round one and two. 

×
×
  • Create New...