SoCal Deek
-
Posts
21,808 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by SoCal Deek
-
-
-
Last night’s game proved this is all nonsense. Tyrod didn’t mentor Mayfield! Heck, TT never even talks to anyone on the sideline. What you saw was a kid who’s not afraid to THROW THE BALL at the open receiver. It really isn’t rocket science!
-
9 minutes ago, billsredneck1 said:
but,but,but everybody said he was fine when wood went down! is it him getting beat by an entire dline stunting inside? ....or his lack of understanding what to call at the line?
But he actually was fine when Wood went down a couple of years ago. What happened to the guy?
-
17 hours ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:
...LMAO....."on the same page".......this guy has yet to get past the damn Table Of Contents let alone pages....SMH.....next............
Truly one of the all time great posts! ?
Well put!!
-
Where’s Ryan Leaf when we need him?
-
There isn’t one thing about the NFL that has improved since Roger Goodell’s been the Commissioner. Yet he keeps his job and even gets a raise. The Owners are clueless.
-
Tuco, is there any chance we can get you a job at OBD? You clearly have an excellent grasp on all of this. Very impressive breakdown. You’re hired!!!
-
1
-
-
As President Trump famously said...”What’ve you got to lose!”
-
1
-
-
Forget the uniforms...you guys are trying to tell me that Trent Murphy is actually playing for the Bills? Really?
-
So now we care about how many different receivers caught the ball? I watched the USC game the other night and the announcers were gushing about the ‘chemistry’ the freshman QB had by repeatedly throwing to a single receiver. I guess it’s all in the way you want to spin it. By the way, both teams LOST.
-
22 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:
One of the last white NFL CBs! He’s really good on the radio. I listen pretty much every day.
We have TreDavious “White”
-
2
-
2
-
-
Feels a bit like when you have a few game tickets left at Chuck E Cheese but not enough to get anything good so you stare into the glass case of cheap crap and wonder if the onion gum will be as fun as it sounds.
-
1
-
1
-
-
Did they something wrong? Why are they being banished to the Bills game? It's like being sent to Siberia!
-
I retire every day on my lunch hour, but then I'm right back to work in the afternoon....just like the rest of America. Maybe the Bills aren't giving out good enough orange slices at halftime.
-
1
-
-
Davis made himself the laughing stock of the entire nation! They even mentioned him on. Music station I was listening to out in California.
-
29 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said:
Has to be this way..you are saying the ball is not dead until THE BALL is out of bounds..think of all the weird plays that can happen as a result of that.
Not exactly, I'm saying that the PLAY should not be dead if the ball is on the field and no player on that field has possession of it. Put another way, if the ball is left lying on the field...all alone...and a player lying completely out of bounds, reaches out and touches it with his fingernail....NO...I do not think that should end the play. Sorry, I just don't.
46 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:You are saying that if the Bills were the beneficiary of that rule and kept possession after what appeared to be a lost fumble...you would still be here pasting that it's a terrible rule that needs to be changed??
Now you are clearly violating Commandment #9 (and there might be some of #10 flavoring your posts as well..)
I've been watching football way too long to be worried about whether things hurt of help the Buffalo Bills.
-
21 hours ago, John from Riverside said:
Not a needle mover for us.....Im interested in what Ray Ray looks like when he gets back
Where did he go? Is he in the Men's Room?
-
Just now, Juice_32 said:
hows this?
Now photoshop the Bills Logo on the side and we can apply it the Team Home Page!
-
1
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:
It was applied in the way it was meant to be. There's not right or wrong to it. It simply defines what an out of bounds ball is, just like the touchback rule does.
If they had awarded the Bills possession, it would have been, per the rule, "wrongly" applies and easily overturned on mandatory review.
It's not the rule you don't like, it's the outcome of the play. Had the Bills player been the one who fumbled and then touched the ball while out of bounds, I'm pretty sure you wouldn't be screaming for a rule change.......
Wrong. You do realize that other than the Ten Commandments, all rules were written by PEOPLE....right? I think it's a dumb 'rule' no matter which team benefits from it. I still say they should re-look at the way it is being applied. That's why they have a competition committee...to tweak things like this. It really doesn't make any sense.
-
Is there an imogi for a DUMPSTER FIRE?
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, Alaska Darin said:
Right? Football games have swung on plays like that. Has the NFL given an explanation of that one? Have the BILLS even asked?
I think I know the play you're referring to, and I cannot recall that the Bills were shown to have clear possession of it under the pile. Did they?
-
The traded Tyrod because "he's black"? People lose their jobs in every profession every day. Lots of employees were laid off in the Great Recession, and many of their friends kept their jobs. So?
-
9 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:
That's not the intent of the rule.
When a player who is out of bounds he touches the ball, the ball is out of bounds. It can't then become "in bounds". It's the same as a player covering a punt with their foot on the goal line as they try to prevent a touchback. As soon as they touch the ball, it's out of bounds--or in this case, a touchback. Even if he taps it backwards and keeps it in bounds, no other player who is in bounds can then possess (or down) it.
No one questions that and it happens all the time.
I understand what the rule says. I just think, like any rule, it can be badly applied. In this case, just like last year, it seems to wrongly 'bail-out' the player that fumbled the ball. The player clearly loses possession, while still in play. Then, while laying on the sideline, he touches the ball (maybe accidently) and the recovering player, who is completely in the field of play, loses a turnover? I would definitely change that rule. It makes no sense.
-
Wow! Apparently everyone in the country is suddenly a racist. I guess I'll have to stop considering the content of their character. That's too old school.
-
1
-
The positive of Mayfield being good
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
So you’re saying we ‘almost’ got a good guy. Good to know!