transplantbillsfan

It matters and mattered as a team stat. A handful of posters viewed it as the definition of accuracy.

Hope that was enjoyable. I disagree. Have fun.

Good stuff man! I genuinely hope this game got your family a little excited to make Bills games every week a thing with you and they become as ravenous as you

No, ultimately his bugaboos are just no worse or different from the typical NFL Franchise QB, all of whom have occasionally spotty accuracy and turn the ball over. It's not saying they aren't things to work on, it's that he's not unique in that sense.

I was one of them. Crow tastes delicious.

@Deranged Rhino you keep repeating Joe has no shot to win in almost every post as though the more times you say it, the more true it is. That's not how it works, just to let you know. But just so I'm crystal clear, are you saying Joe has no shot to win the general election OR the primary as you'd been saying for months or are you finally conceding he can win the primary but stands no chance in the general? And please don't try saying you never said Joe had no shot at the primary, we all know that's not true. But once we get that part finally straightened out, what I believe you really like to do here, from what I've seen, is engage in rhetorical arguments. It seems that's what many of you like to do. Any time I see a poster comment on a poster like me choosing not to engage because their scared or weak or whatever, it's clear you want nothing more than to argue rhetoric. Rhetoric and politics are undeniably linked, so it makes sense. The problem is that you cherry pick what are often comparatively miniscule things in comparison with the big picture constantly while simultaneously denying the big picture itself. Trump won the 2016 election. Obviously. I think he loses the next election because of a lot of the reasons I've already laid out for you that you simply say are not true. Fine, I disagree with you. I think my reasons are true, thus, I think Trump loses. And it'll probably help that I don't think we're going to have 7.5 million people in our country throw away their votes on someone other than the top 2 candidates, which is what happened in 2016 and it was by far the biggest number of votes cast by at least 4 million since the 2000 election, and I'm betting history, but I won't go back to every single presidential election to figure that out. And if people aren't throwing votes away like last time and Trump won thanks to just under 80,000 votes that swung the electoral map in his favor in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania... well... you get what I'm saying, even though I can already anticipate what you'll say. And I disagree. And round and round we go.

Was it catchable? I really only saw it once.

Couldn't tell on the Zay EZ pass because of the camera angle and the broadcast didn't replay it for some reason so never got a good look. I'll take your word for it if you did. That Knox whiff was a killer and it seemed to also be the moment our offensive momentum just stopped today.

at 7.3 YPA after being told for months that Allen is what he is: a sub 60% passer. Well, we're only 3 games in, but he's been pretty consistently in that upper side of 60% range. We as Bills fans are probably catching on that Allen can be an accurate QB. I wonder how long it takes everyone else to see it...

No. Progressives hate Trump. That will get them out to vote no matter who the candidate is. The real reason Trump won 2016 had more to do with who didn't show up to the polls or voted 3rd party because of the widely publicized "gimme" Hilary had in that election than it did some widespread seismic shift in our country. Trump getting elected woke a lot of people the hell up. Your view is clearly that Trump's election was THE indicator of a massive idelogical shift in our country, I believe it's the result of widespread complacency that just won't happen again.

Piss poor point, considering you're wrong.

Not letting Donald Trump win a 2nd term drives the excitement.

Try? Try to rebut anything you said??? You rebut yourself in your ridiculous presumption that the extremists control the Democratic party. Do you notice your 2nd paragraph? Notice who you mention? Yet, who was the Democratic nominee in 2016? Now, this is not surprising considering what we've seen happen to the Republicans, but the winner of the Democratic nomination is almost certainty one of the left of center nominees, not Bernie or Warren.

I'll say what I said earlier: Keep your foot on the gas. No need to accelerate but go whatever speed you're going for the entire game. If we're up 21-3 going into the 4th quarter, maybe it's just me but I've been burned enough by this team that I won't feel comfortable. I didn't like 17 straight passes to start the game last week, so I'd prefer our opening gameplan mixed some runs in. But I also think it's a mistake when any team that has a big lead changes its gameplan because it has a big lead unless that lead is insurmountable. An 18 or 19 point deficit going into the 4th quarter is not insurmountable, just ask the Atlanta Falcons. Don't change the gameplan until you're forced to.

What a bunch of hilarious bulls$h1t. You were CONSTANTLY pushing that he had zero chance to win the nomination, and now you're starting a slow walk back. I'll give you that you're trying to be subtle with your slow walk so as not to be called just plain dead wrong if/when he wins the nomination, which looks only more likely after last night. What on earth are you going to say if/when Trump loses the general election? Bro, I like you, but for as much as you accuse others of having their heads in the sand I think you'd better pull yours out before the tide rises.

Biden's the likely democratic nominee and, therefore, your next President. Embrace it. No, you should read closer and understand your own narrative better. Before you were "Biden has a zero chance" Now you're explaining his chance. So which is it? Zero chance? He has a chance? You're inching there at a snail's pace, but I think you'll get there eventually

I see you've given up the zero shot to win the nomination narrative you pushed for months, so you got that going for ya the ever shifting goal posts... I wonder how long it takes you to do the same for the general.

Did someone seriously just post the front page of the New York Post as a credible take on the debate last night? Oy. Record player moment was a bad moment, yet the guy took another step towards the nomination, despite the absolute stubborn denial of some posters *ahem* over here. Good debate for Biden for those that actually watched.

Pretty clear nothing changed with this debate, other than Castro and Yang probably falling out of the race. Harris was almost cringe-worthy. Big fall after her first debate. Sanders probably falls, too. Klobuchar was meh. Warren was fine. Beto had his best debate by far. He moved something. Booker and Buttigueg have been pretty consistently strong. I would prefer either as our Democratic nominee over anyone else. But nothing changed. Biden is still the frontrunner after what was his best debate. Cherry pick his gaffes (record player) if you want, but anyone pointing to those as the reason he loses to Trump in a general election... well....

It does. But as Bills fans, how comfortable are we at the start of the 4th quarter with... say... a 21 point lead? I've seen this team fall apart too much. It's a mistake when teams change their gameplans when they're ahead. Just ask the Falcons.