I hear what you’re saying, but I don’t know that I would measure success this way…
For example, why would a high vaccination rate be a measure of success if you could show the relative health of the state without high rates of vaccination?
To me, simply basing success on high vaccination rates only seems like success for the pharmaceutical companies…
Furthermore, if you can show relative health for your state through targeted immunization and early treatment, compared to other states, while keeping the economy going strong, don’t you think that would be a better measure of success?