BullBuchanan

You have gotten some truly terrible legal advice. This is all wrong, top to bottom. Do you realize that if you forfeit your rights in the street, you can wind up forfeiting them in court later? If a police officer demands you to open your trunk and they find something that incriminates you or someone else, it's going to be extremely difficult if not impossible to get evidence dropped after the fact.

What you continually fail to understand are that deaths are the tip of the iceberg, not the base.

I'm pretty sure of the two of us, it isn't me that's getting forcefed what to believe by cable news.

Get used to it.

Since we're making up things that don't exist:

Death is not the only outcome, it's just the most serious result. Incarceration, violence, and intimidation are others.

Are they pansies or a violent mob today? I forget is it an odds or evens thing?

You've brought this up several times. It was wrong then and it's wrong now. I'm so white it's almost a caricature, and I have reasons that I've already stated in this thread, and countless others, for distrusting the police that has nothing to do with the fact that they have a tendency to kill and assault a lot of unarmed minorities.

Incorrect. The burden of proof in debate or law is on the part of the accuser. I disagree. Basic civility is fine. Respect is earned, and in my opinion it's handed out far too readily to people that do not deserve it simply because of social norms. Be respectful and nothing will happen? I mean...what?

I think you have that backwards. See me after class.

So here's why Bangarang incorrectly thinks this is the law and why people like JoshAllenHasBigHands thinks that police can do whatever they want - they get away with it. It's not the law, clearly, but when they charge you for it you either have bigger problems, like a DUI, or that's it and you get a $200 fine. In the case of the DUI, the open container is moot, and your lawyer isn't going to waste time on it. In the case of it not being a DUI, how many people are going to fight a small fine where they'll need a lawyer? Even though you have rights, when you let cops interpret what they think the law is, and you don't challenge them on it, those rights go away in effect.

Maybe he's been filling his quota staking out the recycling center.

Because most people don't question information they're given if they trust the source.

Yes, of course I believe that I can say no to the police. Would you let them into your house without a warrant? Would you let them search your trunk without a warrant? You have rights, and as much as they try to act like it, they aren't Kings or deities.

They trained you well.

Kuni's - The best sushi I've had anywhere in the country Cantina Loco - Mexican (New-American flair) with the best from scratch margaritas. The spicy one is the best I've had Desi's (On Clinton) - Get the Godfather sub or the bonanza and die happy. They also have my all-time favorite calzones Dollar Pho - Top tier vietnamese - the bahn mi and pho are excellent Nick's Place - The best greasy spoon breakfast you'll ever find. Mulberry - Great Italian

It's not his strong suit either.

It's ok to see a correlation there, but I don't think it's Fromm's responsibility to do so. I say this as someone who's extremely opposed to what he said. The reporter needs to ask a better and more direct question, not try to connect dots.

Fromm said some very concrete and problematic things to start all of this, so a little bit of follow up has to be expected. With respect to a vague question about his thoughts on "what the country is going through", he's completely within his rights to say that he doesn't want to broadcast his political opinions. That's fine, and honestly it's a stupid question for the reporter to ask unsolicited. It appears the motivation here is to see whether Fromm has changed his perspective or whether he just regrets having his feeling be made public. Too much of a leap for the reporter here, though. He should have just come straight to the point about what steps Fromm's taken and challenged that directly if there was an issue.

I mean, you can just send them a link to a livestream of the game and ask what they can do for you

Story checks out:

As much as I like Tre, in a heartbeat - yes I would. Tre White is probably going to command a $20M + deal. Like other deals that big, Dareus, Mack, Donald it's almost impossible to ever get them to ever live up to the expectations of the deal. No player, even a great one, is going to be there for you play after play year after year. The opportunity cost you give up by having cap hits like that on your roster just kills your flexibility. You need to get super lucky with all-pro talent on super cheap deals in order to sustain any kind of success. If we can get two firsts and a starting caliber CB from a team that isn't certain to be good, I would do it.

When AG goes after corrupt NPO's, you call for them to look into Trump's scandals. When they look into Trump's scandals, you call it a deep state conspiracy.

Yet "conservative muslims"...

It definitely is. Planned Parenthood delivers vital reproductive health care, sex education, and information to millions of people worldwide. Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. is a registered 501(c)(3) nonprofit under EIN 13-1644147. Donations are tax-deductible to the fullest extent allowable under the law. https://www.plannedparenthood.org/about-us/who-we-are When am I not around here? I'm a former member.