Jump to content

Domdab99

Community Member
  • Posts

    3,015
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Domdab99

  1. My pony is slow. Has Kaepernick been playing? Did I miss it? And you want to punish people for speaking out or protesting, is that right? And it's "lose."
  2. Everyone has free speech rights, but everyone will also be held responsible for what they say. Even Bob McNair. Why is this so hard to understand? Free speech means having the right to say what you want. But it doesn't give you the right to expect everyone else to listen to you or to agree with you. Frees speech comes with consequences.
  3. lol The Dolphins are awful...their run D is a sieve. If they finish at .500 I'd be shocked.
  4. My God the Dolphins are awful. How are they 4-2? They can't stop the run and they have no QB.
  5. If it's "intangible," then, by definition, it does not belong in the discussion.
  6. People often ask on this forum what would make you quit the Bills....well, if Trump had become owner, that would've done it for me.
  7. It's nice to see us hovering around the top ten in most lists in the media, but I think 15th is probably more likely.
  8. here you go https://www.google.com/search?q=evidence+the+russians+interfered+in+US+election&oq=evidence+the+russians+interfered+in+US+election&aqs=chrome..69i57.9488j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 Google is easy. But I'm sure you're going to come back and say "smoking gun." Never mind that over TEN of our intelligence agencies have agreed that it happened. The “three or four” agencies referred to by Mr. Trump are the Central Intelligence Agency, the National Security Agency, the F.B.I. and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, all of which determined that Russia interfered in the election. Their work was compiled into a report, and a declassified version was released on Jan. 6 by the director of national intelligence. It said that all four agencies had “high confidence” that Russian spies had tried to interfere in the election on the orders of President Vladimir V. Putin. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/06/us/politics/trump-russia-intelligence-agencies-cia-fbi-nsa.html This is like people saying Climate Change isn't real because only 98 out 100 Climate scientists say it's real. And i'm done with this. Anything else you're going to want answered will have to come from someone else.
  9. No. If you can't find it on your own, anything I post won't sway you. You have made up your mind already. your name is apt.
  10. lol wow. So Russian interference in our elections, calling for the free press to be regulated and "held accountable," deliberately trying to destroy people's health insurance, and so many more things, is just a "difference of opinion." Got it. Go correct someone else now.
  11. <sigh> fine, you're right. I will do a better job of exaggerating to make a point next time. I don't believe that having a different opinion is traitorous. I do believe that still supporting Trump after everything has gone down is traitorous to true American values. Mm I calling for him to be arrested or deported or beheaded? No. I'm simply stating that supporting this administration is against everything we Americans hold dear. With hyperbole. Better?
  12. I said if he still supports Trump now, he's a traitor to his country and American values. Yes. It's called hyperbole. Look it up. And while it wouldn't make anyone a literal traitor to his country, it would make them a traitor to traditional American values. But that's not actionable, is it?
  13. or, you can copy and paste stuff, I guess
  14. lo no you're not. But if saying sexual harassment is okay because it's always been okay in the past is what you want your argument to be, who am I to stand in your way? lol you're funny. I like you. Even if I'm from Las Vegas and still a bit touchy on the whole "gun" thing.
  15. I didn't say voting for Trump makes anyone a traitor. You need better reading comprehension.
  16. He doesn't want to lynch black people?
  17. lol I don't have to, it's a ridiculous comment. Actually, I thought you were Boyst62. But go have fun with your guns. I'm sure you're not compensating for anything.
  18. You didn't get the point of this thread, did you?
  19. You think that's a clever retort, don't you? I knew Harvey Weinstein personally in the 90s. Wrote a script Miramax bought that never got made. He's a despicable human being and I'm cackling in glee over his fall. Why do you think sexual harassment is a party issue? Are you going to speak up over the Harasser in Chief? Or just that every time a Roger Ailes or Bill O'Reilly gets called on the carpet for their crimes and abuse, you're going to point at Miramax and go "But Harvey did it, too!" So what? What does Harvey Weinstein also being a sexual abuser have to do with Bill O'Reilly being one? Name one "liberal crybaby" who is defending Weinstein. Can you say the same for conservatives? this is just yet another pathetic "but her emails" cry. Such snowflakes you are. You know, I get voting for Trump last year, I really do. But if you still support him after everything that's happened over the past year, there is no hope for you. You would be a traitor to your country and American values.
  20. OUR laughter. And what does "liberal crying" have to do with this thread, anyway? You're not seriously defending O'Reilly, are you?
  21. If Jim McMahon, Joe Namath, Trent Dilfer, Brad Johnson, Jeff Hoesteler, Eli Manning, and Joe Flacco can win Super Bowls, so can Tyrod.
  22. Definitely need a RB...
  23. No, see, he paid the LYING WOMAN $32M so his children wouldn't have to see their esteemed father be thrown to the wolves.
  24. TT should have hit down the left side on Sunday - wide open deep.
×
×
  • Create New...