MAJBobby

I think everyone is assuming he is gone via cut or retirement

Isnt his name JackRabbit?

He is Beasley in terms of Zone Recognition with a much more effective YAC ability. For a 3rd and 2 years on a Rookie Deal yes please. I would make this trade over and Barkely or McCaffery trade I think that RE position gets addressed pretty quickly

Yes Please Beane

Oooo I know it was very good word play and wanted to use it to pile on the steaming pile of haack some more

Nice Cheat Sheet to start Day 2 with. ALOT of players still there.

Yep because Hekker can Throw, Hekker can hold and mor importantly something Haack cannot do, Hekker can punt.

Haack took a paycut now Cut Haack

I like this surround Dorsey with experience, set him up for success.

I think a 3rd would get it done. Player for Player.... HMMMM Beasley for Shenault???? Yep Updated with the New Rodgers 22 cap hit

1.3M cap hit post trade.. still has another year on rookie deal after. 3rd will get it done most likely

I would make this call. I loved Shenault in the Draft.

And as of 5 minutes ago with Rodgers new cap hit this is where packers stand roughly Packers -2.7M in space 52 on contract (Adams Tag) ***UPDATE*** Rodgers new cap hit is 28.5M that saved 18.2M so they are closer to being compliant Love that CBs are already in the 1 year deal range. Opens Levi Wallace up for a return guessing his market was soft again.... Maybe GMs realize how CB friendly McDs Defense is and do not want to fall in the Josh Norman trap again.

Completely agree.

I do realize that, and those player counts are NOT irrelevant. they need 90 for camp. So those players on contract will go down as they clear space if cuts are needed, meaning for the UFA purposes more players will b hitting the market within 24 hours. Figure teams have 7 draft choices and sign roughly 13 UDFAs. So going into draft you would want roughly 65-70 on contract to get to your 90