Murdox
-
Posts
207 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Murdox
-
-
Yeah, but when you lose so many offensive starters right before the game, it's difficult. I read that the Browns were actually working on the offense in the parking garage next to their hotel before the game on Sunday. Losing two CBs is rough, but having so many losses on offense I'd argue is much worse. We will see, but the Browns should beat the resting Steelers if they get their starters back.
In any case, I was merely addressing their chances of beating the Steelers. I'd much rather play the Browns than the Colts on WC weekend. That said, according to the ESPN Playoff Machine, if the Colts win, Dolphins win, Ravens win, and Titans win, we would play the Ravens on WC weekend if the Steelers win, and the Browns if the Browns win. So I don't think we want the Steelers to win. Go Browns.
-
1 minute ago, Royale with Cheese said:
I thought about that. The Steelers are to the Browns what the Pats used to be to us.I think Mayfield struggles again and will be a close 17-14 type of finish....not sure who yet.
Well, you have to remember, the Browns were without their starting receivers and 2 starting offensive linemen last week thanks to COVID. If they get those guys back, they will be a very different team this week.
-
Looking at the playoff possibilities, the Ravens seem least likely to get the 7 seed versus seed 5 or 6, so it still makes sense to keep the 2 seed. I don't think any team wants to play the Ravens on wildcard weekend.
-
The fact that the Bills were able to put themselves in a position to beat one of the better teams in the NFC in spite of all the mistakes is a net positive on the day. I understand the frustration, but we should be optimistic. My pessimism is over the fact that the Dolphins have a much softer schedule than us, and they will likely be tied with us when we come off the bye.
-
20 minutes ago, jethro_tull said:
not this game...
The second half we started running fairly well on the few carries we tried. I do agree with you as to the first half.
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Pitch left said:
More importantly Miami may be the team to beat
You are probably correct. The Dolphins play the Broncos, Jets, and Bengals next. Talk about an easy three games.
-
I do think the Bills need to run more. The run game looked promising against the Cards but we didn't run enough.
-
1
-
-
Hopkins is arguably the best WR in football. Tough loss, but glad to see the Bills came back. Can't feel too bad when you lose to a lucky play.
-
3
-
-
On 10/27/2020 at 9:56 PM, LB48 said:
Sean took over a team that hadn't won anything in 17 years. January 2000 was our last play-off appearance! We all lived through it and it was UGLY. Many players and coaches couldn't make the Bills a winner despite tremendous fan support.
Now I see posts about "winning signature games" or if we lose to the Patriots it's a disaster. Crazy and stupid! It's the NFL in 2020 and most teams have a very good QB and can win against any opponent.
IMO Chuck Knox was the best coach in Bills history. He took a losing franchise to respectability and back-to-back play-off seasons. He assembled rookies and veterans to build a strong team. IF he got his indoor practice facility, an aggressive GM and a upgraded contract he might have stayed around.
Marv Levy was an ORGANIZER! Not a great head coach. He had the best team in the NFL talent wise. He refused to make 'adjustments' during a game and felt the best way to win was to let the players do it. Four Super Bowl losses should fall on him. No game planning and no adjustments. Kelly could only do so much but didn't coach the defense and a lot of his success was due to ad-lib plays and Thurman Thomas.
I respect Sean and the 'process'. It's working and Buffalo has a good, NFL competitive on the field each week. GO BILLS!
I disagree with you to some extent about Marv. The only one of the four Superbowls where I thought the Bills had the more talented team was against the Giants. The Redskins team the following year, and the two Dallas teams were better teams on paper. Most experts have agreed with that over the years. The NFC was just a stronger conference for many years during that time period.
8 hours ago, spartacus said:Except Marchibroda, Marv haired crap for coordinators
mega demerits for keeping Walt Corey around to suppress the impact of Bruce Smith
read and react - my ass
I have no problem with Wade Phillips as a DC.
-
1 minute ago, dubs said:
Fair enough.
I’m not saying he was Peterman bad. But at some point we have to start seeing more from Josh and he’s yet to show it. It’s getting to the point where it’s very concerning that perhaps he just doesn’t have it in him. All over the league we are seeing very young QB have great performances, yet Josh has yet to light it up. It’s not like he doesn’t have opportunities. The Bills are throwing a lot, they are giving Allen chances to hit deep throws. The defense has kept them in games.
I have to agree. The number of missed throws to open receivers when he is NOT under any direct pressure is troubling. That said, he does have a great arm - not many QBs could fit the ball in he got to Beasley on the 2nd TD drive.
-
I felt like this game was going to be a challenge when I saw Allen miss a couple of open guys due to sloppy footwork in the opening drive when he had plenty of time. There were certainly other issues to the game (like the offense and clock management at the end of the game - blech), but Allen needs to get some consistency fast if this team is ever going to be something. He just isn't there yet, and there is only so much his legs can do. I'm fearing we whiffed on Lamar.
-
I have to admit that I am getting tired of reading all of the negative press about the city of Buffalo. Rotoworld went bananas and said Buffalo is the "Siberia" of the NFL and very few players would want to go there. They also stated in a separate post that Brown's quality of life would go down if he were in Buffalo. Very tiresome. If you ask me, Buffalo beats Pittsburgh for a place to live.
-
1
-
-
I have lived in NYC for most of my life, for better or worse. People in NYC, whether republican or democrat, have known about Trump's business practices for years. It was regularly in the news, and most of us at some point had interacted with someone who had been - shall we say - dealt a bad hand due to Trump. There is a reason why Kasich won the primary in New York County. Whether that should affect your feelings about him as President is up to you. Anyway, that's enough said on the subject for a football board!
-
3
-
-
I might take Nathan Peterman over Blaine Gabbert. That's all I'll say on the subject.
-
I like how he explains his previous hits on sliding QBs by saying he was "falling into them" and couldn't stop. If what I saw I saw on the video is him "falling into" Allen, I hate to think what he looks like when he really launches himself at a guy carrying the ball. ? I don't know if he's intentionally doing it or not, but he definitely needs to have a better feel for the game when QBs are carrying the ball.
-
I have to say that my biggest takeaway from Rosen was surprise over how weak his arm looked. On many of his throws he also lacked an arc to the ball. A lot of balls were getting batted down.
-
2
-
-
I doubt it is "safe" in the current era of passing and guys entering the draft ever earlier. 4000 yards is the new 3000 yards and likely we will some day soon see a 6000 yard passer (that's still an average of less than 400 yards a game - certainly doable). Also, Brady is only a season behind and has gone on record stating he wants to play until he is 45. If he plays 1-2 more seasons than Brees, he will likely pass him.
That said, all this talk on passing yards is a bit meh, in my opinion. In order to put up a lot of passing yards you need to be a team that throws first and has a bad enough defense to give you an opportunity to keep throwing. The cards have to fall right.
-
23 minutes ago, ColoradoBills said:
Thomas Lott Omnisport
Updated at 12:27 a.m. ET
Updated at 12:27 a.m. ET
Baker Mayfield led the Browns to a 14-point comeback and their first win in 635 days, but head coach Hue Jackson won't name him the starter yet.
Jackson told reporters after the game he would have to "watch the tape" before naming a starter for Week 4.
Mayfield came into the game in the second quarter against the Jets Thursday with Cleveland trailing 14-0. He led a drive on the two-minute drill that got the Browns three points and eventually led the team to a 21-17 victory
I can only assume he's giving TT a little respect. I don't want to shower Mayfield with too much praise yet, but man he fit some tight balls in there. Also, the Favre-like fake pumps showed some real poise in the pocket. If his receivers hadn't have dropped 3 other passes he would have been 20-23 on the night.
-
2
-
-
1 hour ago, Kingston Bills Fan said:
Our O-line is in shambles and we gave up two 2nds to move up 5 spots for Allen and the Cards only gave up a 3rd and 5th to move up 5 spots for Rosen I say Cards got a way better deal!
O-line is a problem. As for the pick, we had competition to move up to 7 (likely the Cards) and Beane was dead-set on Allen so he didn't want to risk losing him. That's why we paid so much.
-
1 hour ago, Yeezus said:
Wrong again. Go look up the stats. Rosen had the best accuracy and completion % while under pressure and on the run out of any QB in the draft, including Mayfield and Jackson who are escape artists.
Who was the worst? You guessed it, the guy we chose to be our QB.
Rosen has already suffered 2 concussions. I thought that was more the issue the OP was trying to note.
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, Bakin said:
I hope it works out for us...really do.
But what I respect about our GM is that he went out there and GOT THE DAMN PLAYERS HE WANTED.
Allen wasn’t my first choice and like most here I thought Rosen would be the better pick.
Obviously Beane didn’t think the same. He could have taken Rosen. He saw something he didn’t like or saw something he preferred in Allen. His hand wasn’t forced. He got what he wanted.
The cost? Meh...who knows what is going on behind the scenes and who’s trying to trade up for whom...I wish we had 53 56 and 65 but Beane went after the number one LB and QB on his boards. Respect.
I was in favour of holding. It wouldn’t have worked out, likely. Maybe Allen would have been there at 12. Maybe not.
I give props to Beane for going and getting the players he wanted.
Looking forward to the QB competition and September can’t get here soon enough!
Dolphins would have likely taken a QB, but we will always wonder....(unless the Dolphins GM discloses it).
-
1
-
-
Rosen has had 2 concussions already. Definitely an issue in the NFL. Allen has the most upside and Beane is looking to make a dent. He must have confidence here. We are not talking about a guy who was rumored to be falling past anything lower than the middle of the first round, and in those mocks other QBs often feel even further. Let's take a deep breath.
-
1
-
2
-
-
20 minutes ago, Fadingpain said:
Get over it. He's a really bad draft pick and most pundits in this country have said that for a long time.
It's gonna remain like this around here until if and when he can start to prove his detractors wrong.
Meh, those same pundits had him going no worse than the top half of the first round.
-
15 minutes ago, Adam727 said:
AND we overpaid on the trade up by a Mile. It cost us 2 2nds to move up from 12 to 7, but only cost the Cardinals a 3rd and a 5th to move up from 15 to 10 for Rosen.
We had competition at 7. I thought that was rather obvious. That's why we overpaid. Likely the Cards and maybe even another team were trying to snag that pick because the Bucs were clearly trying to trade down. We knew who we wanted and were worried someone else would get him.
Would the Bills have beaten the Bucs?
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
Unfortunately, Brady told the Sporting News he's considering playing past 45. We have to deal with him for a few more years yet.