-
Posts
19,027 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Big Blitz
-
I have no idea whether the note is legitimate. We know Trump did have at least some semblance of a relationship with Epstein that goes back to the early 1990s, but so did a lot of people, and Trump said in 2019 that he had not spoken with him for about 15 years prior to that. We also know that this all sounds almost exactly like another story involving the F.B.I. and a newly discovered document that was damaging to Trump: the case of Paul Manafort and the “black ledger.” Recall that in August 2016, just after Trump secured the Republican nomination for president, the New York Times broke the story about allegations of secret foreign payments “designated for” Manafort, Trump’s highly effective campaign adviser. The purpose was clearly to demonstrate a link between Russia and Trump, using Manafort’s business dealings in Ukraine. Manafort denied the thrust of the story, but more importantly, the details of how the Times obtained the information were preposterous. According to the Times, an anti-corruption agency in Ukraine (an oxymoron if there ever was one) just so happened upon the “black ledger” after it was supposedly obtained “when protestors ransacked” an office in Kiev way back in 2014. Words and monetary figures in the compilation of records were all handwritten and purportedly included details of payments for Manafort. Coincidentally, the agency that said it found the book has what the Times called “an evidence-sharing agreement with the F.B.I.” Around that same time, guess what the F.B.I. was doing. Ah, yes, it was lying on court warrant applications to spy on Trump’s campaign while also working alongside the Democrat nominee’s campaign to further associate Trump with Russia! This is the same F.B.I. that has been handling the Epstein case. And so here we are. Another seedy book turns up out of nowhere to associate Trump with criminal conduct. What a coincidence. https://thefederalist.com/2025/07/18/the-leather-bound-epstein-book-reeks-of-being-a-fake-plant-to-implicate-trump/ There are a couple of threads about how Obama’s DOJ was weaponized and corroborated to plant evidence that Russia helped the Trump campaign. That Obama rewrote the ICs findings of no Russian interference 2 days after finding no evidence of any. But carry on about a letter - that even if real (it’s not) implies literally nothing. Maxwell forwarded Trump a letter and said sign this? Nah. No way. Pedo. If you take the fake letter to mean that but brush off actual hard evidence of Team Obama setting up Trump then you’re just a hack. Hard evidence that Team Biden told everyone to lie about his condition? Nahhh nothing to see there.
-
This is what we mean - files in the hands of a Republican administration will not get the same scrutiny. No one will question Obama. Hillary. No one in media will take the declassified info from Tulsi and not say “but but but ….. coordinate a denial campaign”. The public will be gaslit. That’s what would happen with Epstein files that implicate any prominent Dem. Understand why Team Trump roped Ds in to demanding the Epstein release? As for Russia - time for arrests as per Tulsi’s work.
-
You mean they only jump to conclusions when leaked b.s. about Rs but if it’s legitimate sourcing that warrants scrutiny let alone draw perfectly fair conclusions on corrupt Ds - we’ll just ignore it? That’s why Trumps Epstein strategy is brilliant. He would only be talking to his base. But Eppppppppppppstein!!!!!!!
-
Why did he ban him from Mar A Lago by 2007? Why do rich people hang out with other rich people? Well clearly it’s ALL because of pedo trafficking. We asked these questions of Trump in 2016, 2020, 2024. Maybe just maybe you and the media are putting pressure on the wrong guy and the wrong people. Was Hunter Biden ever there? Just wondering out loud. Was Obama? Did he at least meet him by 2005 Dems knowing full well he was running for POTUS in 2007.
-
Hahahahahahahaha omg
-
BREAKING: Wow!!!
-
-
Newly declassified records from @DNIGabbard are additional, compelling evidence that the 2016 Russia Collusion narrative was not rooted in credible intelligence reporting, but manufactured to fit a preferred political narrative. Gabbard has taken the rare and transparent step of declassifying a December 2016 draft of the President’s Daily Brief or PDB. This highly classified record, which is a daily national security analysis for the President, assessed that “Russian and criminal actors did not impact recent US election results by conducting malicious cyber activities against (election) infrastructure.” But after push back from the FBI, then led by James Comey, the PDB was spiked “based on new guidance.” After a White House Principals meeting, a new intelligence assessment was commissioned, and media leaks followed, reinforcing a new narrative that “Russia intervened in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump win the presidency, rather than undermine confidence in the U.S. electoral system.” TIMELINE December 8, 2016 Draft PDB - Russia “did not impact US election results” Hours later, FBI withdraws support PDB is killed “based on new guidance” December 9, 2016 Obama White House Gathers Top Cabinet Officials including Clapper, Brennan, Susan Rice, Andrew McCabe and others. New Intelligence Assessment is commissioned January 6, 2017 New Intel Assessment : Russia interfered to help Trump
-
UPDATE: ISRAEL v IRAN - Ceasefire reached?
Big Blitz replied to Big Blitz's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
No. I didn’t forget Solamani neither. Or other terrorists we killed. Against a country.