I have no idea whether the note is legitimate.
We know Trump did have at least some semblance of a relationship with Epstein that goes back to the early 1990s, but so did a lot of people, and Trump said in 2019 that he had not spoken with him for about 15 years prior to that.
We also know that this all sounds almost exactly like another story involving the F.B.I. and a newly discovered document that was damaging to Trump: the case of Paul Manafort and the “black ledger.”
Recall that in August 2016, just after Trump secured the Republican nomination for president, the New York Times broke the story about allegations of secret foreign payments “designated for” Manafort, Trump’s highly effective campaign adviser. The purpose was clearly to demonstrate a link between Russia and Trump, using Manafort’s business dealings in Ukraine. Manafort denied the thrust of the story, but more importantly, the details of how the Times obtained the information were preposterous.
According to the Times, an anti-corruption agency in Ukraine (an oxymoron if there ever was one) just so happened upon the “black ledger” after it was supposedly obtained “when protestors ransacked” an office in Kiev way back in 2014. Words and monetary figures in the compilation of records were all handwritten and purportedly included details of payments for Manafort. Coincidentally, the agency that said it found the book has what the Times called “an evidence-sharing agreement with the F.B.I.”
Around that same time, guess what the F.B.I. was doing. Ah, yes, it was lying on court warrant applications to spy on Trump’s campaign while also working alongside the Democrat nominee’s campaign to further associate Trump with Russia!
This is the same F.B.I. that has been handling the Epstein case. And so here we are. Another seedy book turns up out of nowhere to associate Trump with criminal conduct. What a coincidence.
https://thefederalist.com/2025/07/18/the-leather-bound-epstein-book-reeks-of-being-a-fake-plant-to-implicate-trump/
There are a couple of threads about how Obama’s DOJ was weaponized and corroborated to plant evidence that Russia helped the Trump campaign.
That Obama rewrote the ICs findings of no Russian interference 2 days after finding no evidence of any.
But carry on about a letter - that even if real (it’s not) implies literally nothing. Maxwell forwarded Trump a letter and said sign this? Nah. No way. Pedo.
If you take the fake letter to mean that but brush off actual hard evidence of Team Obama setting up Trump then you’re just a hack.
Hard evidence that Team Biden told everyone to lie about his condition? Nahhh nothing to see there.