bbb
-
Posts
16,686 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by bbb
-
-
I wonder what he is trying to accomplish releaseing a vidio like that,fake or real.
That's why I'm leaning towards real now. If he was thinking with a clear head, he would realize there is no upside to this. What kind of judge would let him have his kids at this point? Who would hire him, except for maybe some whacked out reality show? He's showing himself to be uninsurable in terms of a movie or TV show.........So, I think his messed up mind thinks that Well, they loved him on twitter, etc. - let's do all the new media, and doesn't really know the point of it or the endgame is.
-
When was this recorded? Who released it?
From what I understand, Charlie is doing his own ustream shows. I think he did one Saturday in a talk show format......This one was done Monday and there is a newer one done Tuesday.
Exiled - I think you are right.
-
It seems that way to me now, too........The veins Booster mentioned, the more gaunt by the day look, the seriously furrowed brow which indicates a ton of tension all tell me he's circling the drain.........Plus, the fact he won't keep getting the attention he got last week, and what's he going to do without that. Try to up his game tragically, I think.
The only thing I can think that is close to comparable is when Freddie Prinze blew his brains out right when he had a super huge hit.....But, that wasn't done in front of everybody over a period of time.
-
Yeah, I thought it was all an act last week, but now he's really looking messed up, and I don't know if that can be faked. He appears to be getting thinner and more pale every time.
-
-
Your not going to wade through 4 pages and your questioning my effort?
When did I question your effort? It takes no effort to realize that 16,000 NFL players makes no sense. If 10 other people brought up the same thing on pages 2-3, then go bother them.
-
Yeah dude your like the 10th person to note that error, so you're not exactly original. I must have made an error in reading the wiki answer. Could you ever forgive me? But I think you get the point, don't you. There's an overwhelming minority and majority. If you're that worried about it, go count up the players. Jeesh. Coo Coo.
Nobody did it on page one or page five and I wasn't go to wade through pages 2-4 to find out....I figured somebody would have said it by the end of page one if it was going to be said..........You could count them, but I prefer to multiply them - say 65 tops on a roster X 32 teams = 2080 if my calculator works.....When you read the number of 16,000 didn't it seem ridiculously high?
-
that white players are better Quarterbacks in the NFL?
According to Wiki Answers there are 3,867 white athletes vs 11,978 black athletes in the NFL.
How can there be almost 16,000 athletes in the NFL? Is the new collective bargaining agreement going to expand rosters to 500?
-
"Bozo | Feb 17, 2009 | Reply
When I read the headlines I thought this was about Micheal Phelps"
How about this for not getting sarcasm. Both are pro-pot obviously, but the 2nd guy doesn't get that the first guy is:
ahmed | Feb 17, 2009 | Reply
this just in, 98% of pot users report having watched tv within the last 6 months, While this is both distrubing and perplexing it does offer a look into the twisted lives of pot smokers, and perhaps suggests that tv not pot is the real gateway drug.
Seamus | Mar 26, 2009 | Reply
Sorry Ahmed, but the conclusions youve drawn from the aforementioned statistic are completely unfounded and quite insulting as I am a regular user of marijuana. The fact that 98% of pot smokers have watched television in the last 6 months lends no insight into the "twisted lives of pot smokers". Everyone watches TV, it's one of the recognized american pastimes, along with baseball and pies. Thusly, it should come as no surprise that those with money for weed would also own televisions. As a matter of fact, you would be hard-pressed to find ANYONE in the US who hasn't watched TV in the last 6 months. Oh, and TELEVISION, is not a !@#$ing gateway drug.
-
I thought you saw a picture of my d!ck!
Other people have seen it and said Hey, I'm a Bona grad, etc. It's not that hard to figure it out. I guess the spectacles were not as good in the 1700s, huh, Mr. President.....You would have at least been a lot more clever if you came back as John Quincy Adams, instead of Peace. But, then that wouldn't have fooled anybody, which was obviously your intention....I'm smart enough to know who you are, Quincy.
Talk about bogus.
I was just thinking about the irony of somebody who pulled such a bogus stunt calling somebody else out as dishonest. Too funny.
-
I am supposed to know from that blurry one inch photo where you went to school? Yeah, you're smart all right.
I thought you saw a picture of my d!ck!
Other people have seen it and said Hey, I'm a Bona grad, etc. It's not that hard to figure it out. I guess the spectacles were not as good in the 1700s, huh, Mr. President.....You would have at least been a lot more clever if you came back as John Quincy Adams, instead of Peace. But, then that wouldn't have fooled anybody, which was obviously your intention....I'm smart enough to know who you are, Quincy.
Talk about bogus.
-
At the time I started giving you crap, you were not. It is a game, nothing personal. So frigging relax. I suspect there is a reason you freak out when you smoke weed, but stop trying to blame the weed IMO.
Good enough. I think we're done now. I also would advise you to relax, as well. You didn't seem too relaxed the other night. It's not healthy getting that worked up about a message board.
-
Bolded - Nothing really. I disagreed with your unwillingness to address other's points, so gave you crap. It really is that simple tiny.
Who didn't I address? I wrote out long replied to Simon's two questions....Not sure who else you're talking about.
So the tiny part you believe, but my grades you don't!
-
I'm not up on my pot measurements. Isn't 200 grams a lot?
-
How about a paycheck stub? Do you know how to do that? Hell, even Connor could manage that much.
I'm self-employed so I don't have paycheck stubs. And, even if I did, you'd just say I'm making it up, photoshopping, whatever.
Why do I have to do any of this? I've wasted way too much time on this thread as it is. I told you who I am - good and bad. You're going to believe me or not. You're going to hate me no matter what, it seems, just because I posted a scientific study about pot and told you my real-life experiences. As I said, I could care less about the legality of it, because I don't know anybody who has ever spent time in a cage for smoking pot. If people were, then I'd be for legalizing it.
So, what is your big beef with me?
-
So, it is too hard to find your transcripts and well nigh impossible to figure out how to upload things? Are you sure you aren't a putz?
Not even close to impossible to figure out how to upload a picture. That's why I said taking the time to figure it out. I haven't done it before, so I would have to take the time to figure it out.........And, not knowing where transcripts are that I haven't seen in almost 20 years - yeah that makes me really stupid.
-
But he's a putz who brags about gpa and salary numbers but won't share any backup. So he's got that.
You seriously want me to find my friggin transcripts. Yeah, I have hours to go hunting them down. Then, I'm supposed to take the time to figure out how you post something to the gallery........The funny thing is that you kept asking what school? And, on every post I make you can see my undergrad right in my avatar!
You also go two ways - you laugh that I said I got an assistantship, in a way that meant it's a dopey little thing. I'm not sure if you know what it means, but what it meant to me is that while my friends in my MBA program were paying $20K+ a year in tuition, the school was not only giving me a free ride, but also paying me $10K just so that I would go to their school.
I also said I have panic disorder. You didn't ask for proof of that. I also have a small d!ck, and am now disgustingly out of shape. I hope you don't want proof of that.
So, it's bragging when I defend myself from being called a stupid, worthless person by pointing to what I really am. But, the negatives I say about myself, they are what - bragging? All I do is speak the truth to the best of my knowledge. I have no reason to make anything up. I'm not a message board "persona." I'm just me.
And, all this is coming from a guy who goes by John Adams, then takes himself and his persona so seriously that he transforms from John Adams into Peace. Wow - where did that great John Adams go - so mysterious.
And, the funniest thing is "John Adams" appears for the first time in half a year to back up Peace on this thread. "Somebody" told him about the thread. Yeah, it was such a barnburner that John Adams had to see it!Yeah, you are the person that I should spend my day looking for transcripts for.
< Once again, my undergrad school, for those slow on the uptake.
Fixed.
I see my 0.00% was too high.
-
Made it up, because you're a putz and never provided one for your crusade.
You make 0.00% sense. What crusade am I actually on? I've had one position all along, and that is enough to make me have to endure your never-ending attacks and hate?
-
And for the other 99.9 % of us?
Where are you getting your number from?
-
I am not BBB but I feel I can respond to this question as an outsider with insight, being that I have never smoked pot.
A lot of things are relatively harmless. Weed in relation to alcohol is relatively harmless on the basis that alcohol is more readily available, consumed, and misused. There have been accidents involving pot, whether someone had it fall in their lap and burn them or had their reflexes altered. Two kids I went to high school with had both of those happen.
To agree with this statement I would say, sure, it is correct, but handguns are relatively harmless, too. A shotgun or machine gun is harmless!
To answer Simon's question, I have to first say that I echo this. And, really the term relative would really need to be defined.
I think it is relatively safe if you compare it to hard drugs and alcohol.
But, to say it again, there are no free lunches with Mother Nature. She can be a B word. So, when you are doing something to alter your mind, you are certainly taking a chance, at the least.
At the very least, you have the things jboys mentions. And, on the scarier end, you have the things that are in the studies that keep popping up on my aol homepage. I got lucky compared to these people. I had my first panic attack after smoking it. These poor people developed schizophrenia and other psychoses while smoking it.
Every once in awhile one of these studies pops up when I'm surfing the net, and it seems like an incredible amount of people with these problems had pot as their first trigger.
Now, it can be said that I would have had panic disorder and these people would have been psychotic eventually anyway. But, this latest study and common sense seems to dictate that there is a certain percentage who would not have got to that point without the trigger....And, even if you say the others were 100% destined to develop these things, maybe the pot made the onslaught come say 3 years earlier. How much better would three more years of normal life have been. It's priceless.
Then, there are other subtler things, like jboys said. For example, my pot smoking hippie Socialist friend that I do business with - we were emailing each other about who she could get to do some outsourced work for her. She said her best friend would be really good at it, "but he's such a pothead that he won't want to do it." So, this was pothead on pothead bashing. She even recognizes what it can do to your motivation, etc., even though she loves it and smokes it every day.
So, my conclusion is that if you compare it to the odds of having harm come from hard drugs or alcohol, it would be less harmful. But, I can't even say it's relatively harmless, because if you or your loved ones were triggered into schizophrenia when they smoked pot, I don't think you'd think it was relatively harmless, at all. You'd be 100% harmed.
-
Humor?
You said: So you had to post all that to make a point that almost anything can be harmful in large quantities.
He said: well I have a sense of humor and find that sight amusing
-
That some of us believe it's immoral and un-American to lock some poor, harmless sumbitch in a cage because he'd rather relax with a corn-cob pipe than a more personally and socially damaging jug of whiskey.
And, if you can find me saying anything regarding that, then let me know.
I know a lot of people who smoke pot, and I used to smoke a lot of pot, but I don't know anybody who has ever been locked in a cage because of it.
I've never taken a stand here about the legality of it. I'm actually 50/50 thinking that it would be a good idea to make all street drugs legal. The benefits to that are numerous, and I'm sure you know them, but my hesitation is this - when I was in high school, my best friend and I were pretty much the only ones smoking pot at parties, etc. I went to Catholic school in the 70s.......So, then by like soph or junior year, NYS decriminalized pot. All of a sudden, all the "good boys and girls" were smoking it. Mostly boys, actually.
So, my hesitation on legalizing all drugs is that a similar thing will happen - a lot of people who might otherwise not do it - they see it as a green light. And, I think you can't put the genie back in the bottle. It's a high risk high reward concept, I think. So, I'm still torn on it.
As for pot itself, I think it's about as illegal as firecrackers are. I haven't ever seen anybody get arrested for either.
-
PS Was the obvious sarcasm of Steve's Tojan "Pot is harmless" funny? I'm trying to get a feel for what is considered good humor around here.
-
So my asking a mild question out of simple curiosity is akin to relentlessly defending my mother from a slur? And I'm the one who's so serious?
Perhaps us pot guys folks who still believe in the sanctity of America's individual freedoms just think your sense of humor shows more effort than ability?
An immediate light-hearted reply that says this -
is an over-effort?Wait - is this sarcasm again?!?
My attempt at humor makes me the serious one. OK?
And, the reason I maybe falsely lumped you in with the other folks is because all I did was post a study. And, try to fend off attacks since with failed attempts at humor.
I will post a serious reply when I get another minute. But, so I can frame it right - what do you mean by "folks who still believe in the sanctity of America's individual freedoms?" And, where have I said anything regarding that?
Charlie Sheen ladies and gentlemen, Charlie Sheen
in Off the Wall Archives
Posted