AKC
Community Member-
Posts
2,214 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by AKC
-
I'll tell you what's funny about that- Fletcher actually has a higher average than Atlanta's regular return man at 21.7 yards per return!
-
While McGee is doing a superb job as a return man, it's the blocking on return teams that has impressed me to a higher (or even much higher) degree. After too many years watching our return men running up the backs of their blockers it's clear April is absolutely solid on return timing adn the teaching of it, and given the better athletes the team has been willing to offer him on STs has made our return game very dangerous in short order. IMO if we brought in other return men to play in our unit we'd still be far more dangerous than would McGee playing behind, for instance, the Falcons return team. It's another example as far as I'm concerened of the fixation on the ball we all as fans find ourselves slave to at times. Now there's no doubt that McGee has an excellent shot at the Pro Bowl spot in the AFC, but like most of those before him he'd really be representing the blockers from his return unit in Hawaii.
-
One thing I suspect helps juice up the atmosphere at OneSimonDrive is the phenomenal display of instinctive pass rushing performed by one Lawyer Milloy the past couple Sundays. I don't believe I've ever seen any pass rusher coming from the Bill's D backfield who was that skilled at sliding off blocks.
-
It seems reasonable to throw out any insinuation that the mix of ST/D to offensive TDs is different over this 3 game stretch versus any in the past. Team scoring is the stat and the team includes all three phases.
-
***OFFICIAL DEN vs. BUF playoff breakdown***
AKC replied to tornado681's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Yee, the eternal optimist. Don't think for a moment that the same thought pattern you describe above is not continuing to rot in the bowels of 3 or 4 of TBD guests who believe the QB is fully responsible for all losses while his teammates conversely are the only ones capable of carrying the team to a W. But it is fun having a shot going into the home stretch, regardless of how much tripe we've been asked to inspect throughout the course of the season. We dodged a bullet today, a lot of it due to poor coverage team work. The season suggests that is not something we should expect to see in long stretches for during the balance of the regular season. I like it. So I'll officially adopt your level of optimism and buy extra wings for next weekend ;-) -
I'll have to watch it again- I seem to recall his inertia was carrying him as much as any acceleration on his part and his body was a little high to get the scoop without falling over. I didn't really think on the first look that he was even in a great position to fall on it.
-
Interesting little tidbits on Lee Evans today
AKC replied to Kelly the Dog's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
I didn't read it at all that way, although I realize the TV coverage team suggested it. When they came back and showed the angle from the lower corner of the field the ball looked like it was thrown away from the DB while leaving Evans in stride. A Raider fan watching the game with me said "That's just a perfect pass". I concur. -
I agree completely- I remember how frequently the ball gets loose during fumble drills in football practice and the actual odds of his getting two (proven very good) hands on the sides of the ball and taking off versus securing it by diving on it might not be that far apart in probability. While there are many on the field whose hand reliability makes the dive and tuck the better play, with Nate his choice on this one looked like a decent decision. Had he taken the nose dive and knocked it OB I'll bet we'd be reading about what a poor choice was made for not just picking up the easy ball and running it in for a TD!
-
I get the feeling that as long as Lee is playing with one of the 7 or 8 QBs in the league who are capable at any time of setting a rainbow 60-yarder over his shoulder in stride he'll remain a significant threat. He's got awesome hands- I can't remember the last time I saw him letting a pass get through his hands to his body. He has a short game to be sure, but that seems predominantly set up by his threat to haul in that big pass. If the big pass were taken away I suspect he'd become a lot more mortal on the intermediate routes.
-
So you think Jennings is worth outanding OL $?
AKC replied to Fake-Fat Sunny's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Jonas has possibly the best slide of any OT in the league, his lateral footwork in pass blocking is exceptional. This puts him in a pass-blocking class with few students and would make him a huge asset in a pass-first offense like St. Louis or KC. The other part of his game is his real achilles, he seems to simply be too top-heavy to be a good run blocker in space and he even has some trouble in hand to hand run blocking because he's fairly easy to get under with all that weight on top and proportionately thin calves. The overall package means his value to 4 or 5 teams is huge while that value diminishes for tohers, especially for a team running a play action offense like ours. If anyone in the league wants to pay him like a top 10 Tackle he should be allowed to go. His skills, and his fit in Buff translate more to maybe top 30 money. And since I haven't said it before FFS, if it hasn't been clear before today you're analysis of Coy Wire has been 100% on. He's playing more inspired ball on the "Special Forces" and he's become an asset to us, something that seemed "less than imminent" in his role in the Defensive backfield. -
McGahee's college performances versus his pro performances will contemporarily and even inevitably be considered with his recovery as a bellwether, but I'm not so sure it's going to end up being an accurate way to look at those abilities. I don't watch much college ball anymore, but it's still clear when watching the college game just how common it is for a college back's skills to be a poor fit in the NFL. Willis is bigger now than he ever was in college. He looks to me as if he might just possess as innate a skill at understanding his blocker's field of opportunity and effectiveness as Thurman. He shows very good to excellent strength off a single set of hands, a dynamic that must not be overlooked in assessing his skill sets at this point in time. I have to believe his physical maturity and weight training over the course of his injury rehab have made him more dangerous in the step up to the NFL, a league that accedes the occasional play to speed but more often than that rewards the ability to bust off that first set of hands. Would he have been able to take his 225 pound college frame and done the same things he's doing in the big leagues at 237? The good news is it appears it's a study we'll have front row seats for.
-
Anybody getting the feeling that Drew will
AKC replied to Mikie2times's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
I'm convinced those of you fanning the rumor of a Bill's move to Salt Lake City will end up disappointed. -
Another take on Bledsoe/ offensive efficiency
AKC replied to Coach Tuesday's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
We need to head right over to the Falcons board to explain to their fan base why Michael Vick is such an obvious recipe for disaster based upon this statistical analysis. There may still be time to save their season by getting Matt Schaub the balance of the team's snaps in '04. -
OK, I'll bite. I don't have film for the frist itme this year because the little lady was in the hospital yada yada yada. On the one game view I was able to make Bledsoe sucked, the first throw to the middle fo nowhere was followed by even worse offerings. I thought early on the opportunities to move the ball on the ground (and especaily on the right side) were not well addressed by our linemen but I'll concede the point with no backup to review. Your call is that Bledsoe was unable to adjust personally to the scheme Belichick came to play, which was to overcrowd the line and bring it on nearly every play to confuse his former QB (and hide his deficiencies in the D backfield), and it worked perfectly. I have to ask you in your opinion how many times this season, previous to this game, was an opposing coach able to beat us by simply unvieling a strategy to befuddle our QB and having that strategy play out the way it was designed?
-
You wouldn't be talking about the same Joe Dufek that had a QB rating of 52.9 while playing for the Bills? The same Vince Ferragamo who posted a 50.8 passer rating while in a Bill's uni? And you can't possibly be talking about the same Rob Johnson who was too recently cut from our roster, are you? If you are let me share with you the wisdom of converting all your property and investments into Krugerands! And they're fun to polish too!
-
That's pronounced "Thank you sir, may I have another- Please".
-
A message board community can be enhanced with a mix of posters that even includes those who choose a controntational personality. It only becomes pathetic when one of those who chooses such a personality is unable to "take" in the same manner in which he "gives". As for your comprehension level, high school might be a bit of a jump. I'd think you'd find it a bit embarassing to note that among all the posters in the string you're the ONLY one confused about the subject in the title. TTU later, it's gotta' be time for your nap!
-
Still trying to differentiate between "Push" and "Pull" I see! Carry on! You may see the ,"ahem", light when you go back to the original post, a post you alone seem to be struggling to grasp. I'll be sure to dummy the next one down so that there's less of likelihood for you to be forced to embrace the conical cap once again!
-
I figured Gruden, with Back to Back disappointments and his inability to get his "offensive genius" to work in his third year on the Bucs staff would rate pretty high. To some degree the results so far suggest that that who you watch/have watched is that who you believe is failing at the highest level.
-
The Corleone reference is yours. But I'll play. How's this: You can lead a horse to water, but somebody always seems to end up with their head stuck up its ass. (Having one's head in there might also explain a considerable difficulty with reading comprehension)! The fact is that Brady is a poor Red Zone QB who is bailed out by the best kicker in the NFL during the regular season, the post season and especially during big games. I have led you to the facts; you need look no further than the New England game recaps to see that Brady chokes more often than most NFL QBs once he crosses the 20 yard line. Ignore it, deny it, but its a fact supported by his play every week and the resultant stats. This week is a perfect example: 6 Red Zone trips, a running back in Corey Dillon having a field day against us, and only 2 TDs to show for it. It's why Brady remains among the worst in the league in points per red zone play- his red zone trips are most likely to end up as Vinatieri scores. Bottom line- Brady is very, very good between the 20s and he consequently gets himself a lot of Red Zone opportunities. That's the premium on his playing ability, between the 20s. It does not change the fact that he's a proven underachiver once he hits the red zone.
-
I noticed passes reaching the defenders much, much faster ;-) What I saw that I really, really didn't like was Losman running and diving forward. It would be bad enough in a game in reach, it's purely stupid in a game that's over. His bad habits in pre-season are incredibly disappointing to see popping right back up, especially considering his injury. I don't expect him to come in and play well right away, but it would sure be nice to see him come in and play with some intelligence.
-
Betwen these coaches there are 7 Super Bowl wins and a proverbial mountain of media glorification including "genius" tags. There is also one rookie. Which one is stinking up the joint the worst among them?
-
I'd hope the moment his Passer Rating drops below the 16.7 it's at right now!
-
I hate to use Theisman as a reference but even that jackass pointed out the difference in pocket time "enjoyed" by the QBs, about 4 seconds for Brady and not even 3 for us.
-
During the Pat's second Offensive series we got good pressure on Brady up the middle on two consecutive plays, one resulting in a sack. Brady then lost nearly all ability to play football by throwing 4 of his next 5 passes into terra x and the first row of seats in Gilette. Luckily for the Pats Weiss adjusted well enough to control that same pressure for the balance of the game and Brady finally got his act back enough to string together another of his standard "Mr. Field Goal" games, with great production between the 20s but poor execution in the Red Zone. On the one hand was an exhibit of what pressure does in spurts; over on the Bill's Offense was a different example, the effect of a QB pressing due to constant pressure and stinking up the joint all night as a result. If a bit of humor can be garnered from the game it has to be the fan reaction to having Bill Belichick play our new staff for the second time in 6 weeks, this time on his own turf. It's hard to imagine any observant fan being surprised that Mularkey and Co. got worked by the best technical coach in the NFL today. But there they are, falling out of their chairs over an L to Bill Belichick. I have to say disappointment is one thing, but hysteria is another thing altogether. It's time for a little reality check for Bill's fans: Last year's NFC Champion Panthers, the team that New England needed Adam Vinatieri to put away in the Super Bowl, are 2-7 The Super Bowl winners (and runners-up) from the previous season are 3-6 Joe Gibbs, Bill Parcells and Jeff Fisher are all heading up 3-6 football teams. While the game of football is getting less predictable, Bill Belichick manages to give his team a strategical edge- especially against teams he sees more frequently. For Christ's sake, give the guy some props instead of trashing your own staff and roster; the guy is the top coach in football right now and we play in his division. Look at what he's done for the reputation of Brady, a QB who is in the bottom of the league in Red Zone production- some fans actually believe Brady is the best QB in football, and that takes some real magic from the head coach to mask the fact that all he truly does well is move the ball between the 20s. As far as the Bills are concerned, we have been improving our play through the course of the season and the Sunday night hiccup shouldn't change that at all. I expect this team is going to finish well, and that's regardless of who is playing at the QB position for us. We've beaten a good team and I see no reason why we won't do it with more frequency. Mularkey just got his certified indoctrination into the AFC East this past Sunday night, if he's our coach of the future our team will take a bigger step forward in the learning curve from it than any other game we've played under his tutelage.
