Jump to content

Brandon

Community Member
  • Posts

    3,682
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Brandon

  1. are you insane?

     

    hes the next akili smith.  not just cause he's black, but because he is so bad

    314068[/snapback]

     

    What, are you a professional scout or something? Lose the attitude. You're nothing but a fan sitting behind a computer, just as I am, and your opinions hold no more validity than anyone else's.

  2. I don't like the kid.  Seemed like a system guy to me.  I believe Campbell is a far better QB and I wouldn't be shocked if he fell to the very bottom of the 1st round.

    314029[/snapback]

     

    I think Campbell will prove to be the best QB taken from this draft class a few years down the road.

  3. Great answer from Aaron Rodgers:

     

    Suzy asks him about the wait in the draft and Rodgers says "it's building character". You know he wanted to say "it farking sucks"

    313980[/snapback]

     

    He's probably thinking 'What do you think the wait is like, you moron? I've lost $25 million in the last two and a half hours.'

  4. What do you all make of Mike Williams not getting picked yet?  He's Mel's numero uno!

     

    PTR

    313876[/snapback]

     

    He's big, but he's got average speed and has been out of football for a year. He may turn out to be a great pro, but it would not suprise me if he has to wait quite a while before hearing his name called today.

  5. And this is the first draft I have actually watched.  I'm trying to write 2 papers (easily distracted) and this draft takes forever.  The Bills have to do something cool.  Please make it exciting.  :lol:  And how bout rapid fire 40 second clock for the round.  That would makes things interesting, if your pick isn't in your have to wait.  :w00t:

    313841[/snapback]

     

    Don't worry. The Vikes pick soon and those morons are known for passing on first round picks and allowing teams to rapidly jump ahead of them.

  6. If it's Williams, then that puts a chokehold on the Cardinals, but takes the Bucs out of the running for Henry.

    313821[/snapback]

     

    Yup. If that happens (and I think it will), Denny Green just lost all leverage in any potential Henry trade.

  7. 2.55) OT Adam Terry, Syracuse

    2.63) WR Vincent Jackson, Northern Colorado

    3.86) C Jason Brown, North Carolina

    4.122) DE Chris Canty, Virginia

    5.156) CB Dustin Fox, Ohio State

    6.197) K Tyler Jones, Boise State

    7.236) CB Travis Daniels, LSU

     

    This is a bit of a revision from my mock draft yesterday, but its my final seven rounds for the Bills. The Bills are still trading Henry to the Eagles, but for the 63rd overall pick. No time for comments on these.

  8. If its true, I'd guess that they probably offered the 63rd overall pick, which still isn't bad at all. I would have been tempted to just take it. That said, I can't blame Donahoe for holding out a little bit longer. Perhaps if the Bills were to tack on a little extra, they might be able to get the 35th (or even 31st) overall pick, a scenario I detailed in the mock draft I posted this morning (with the Bills adding a 3rd next year to get pick 35).

  9. I thought I'd go ahead and post one mock draft before tomorrow before I go on record with my likely very inaccurate final prediction tomorrow morning.

     

    One trade, though this mock draft originally included a second trade, also with Philadelphia. I've also included comments on the day 1 picks. I'll probably give explanations for all the picks in my final prediction tomorrow.

     

    ---Buffalo Trades RB Travis Henry and a 2006 3rd round draft choice to Philadelphia for the Eagles 35th overall pick.

     

    2.35) OT Adam Terry, Syracuse

    The Bills have a lot of options with this pick and its been a very tough pick for me to predict (I also think it could be TE Alex Smith or WR/TE Matt Jones), but I think they'll play it relatively safe here and select an OL. Terry isn't quite an elite LT prospect, but he's a good one and given the Bills weakness at the position, he could easily be the starter by the end of the season.

     

    2.55) DE Justin Tuck, Notre Dame

    Donahoe has a well established history of drafting highly talented players with injury questions and Justin Tuck would be yet another one. Tuck needs to add some weight, but otherwise is a very good prospect in this draft and could develop into the pass rushing terror that the team has been missing for the last few years. He should make an immediate impact as a pass rush specialist in long yardage situations.

     

    3.86) C Jason Brown, North Carolina

    Jason Brown isn't really considered an elite prospect in this draft due to his less than ideal movement ability, but if he lives up to his reputation as possibly the strongest player in the draft, he'll fit right in on a team that will feature the run in 2005. Its also notable that he has allowed only two sacks in three years as a starting C, both as a sophomore.

     

    4.122) WR Mark Bradley, Oklahoma

    5.156) CB Dustin Fox, Ohio State

    6.197) K Tyler Jones, Boise State

    7.236) CB Travis Daniels, LSU

  10. How do you figure?  We only need somewhere in the neighborhood of $3.5 mil right now to cover the max rookie pool and 2nd and 3rd round choices don't cause significant cap hits.

     

    There are plenty of ways to free up cap space, which TD has alluded to numerous times over the past couple of months.

    309755[/snapback]

     

    I agree, and you also have to consider that all of these scenarios of stockpiling draft picks involve a trade of Henry and/or Clements. Trading them will result in a fairly significant cap savings which will probably be enough to sign their picks and have some room left over.

  11. It looks like we can put the Nate trade talk to bed...sort of

    308642[/snapback]

     

    I certainly wouldn't go that far. It appears that the Redskins are definitely interested in acquiring a top veteran CB in some sort of deal with their 9th overall pick. Given that the last four paragraphs of the article discuss the possibility of the Redskins being interested in trading for Clements, and is coming from a Washington newspaper, I'd say that the rumor has more life than ever.

  12. I've been against trading Nate Clements, but I'm starting to come around to the idea IF they can find a solid veteran CB to replace him with. If they could do that, such a trade would give them the opportunity to draft two or three potential upgrades offensively which are desperately needed and still have a pick left over to find a good CB prospect in R2 or 3. In other words, if they can turn a trade of Nate Clements into two or possibly three good players at LT, C, CB or TE, yeah, that's something that I'd have to consider if I were Donahoe.

×
×
  • Create New...