Jump to content

EmotionallyUnstable

Community Member
  • Posts

    9,982
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by EmotionallyUnstable

  1. They need the cap room for for free agency, which is before the draft. Plus, no one wants to absorb that contract. They'll wait till he hits the FA market. Though this would be best case scenario, idt he makes it through February.
  2. Could someone explain why if you plan to tag him, would you do some with the transitional, rather than the non-exclusive tag?
  3. I was fully expecting this to be Denver's Brandon Marshall...wrong again.
  4. Just want to add Rex's draft history as a reason that they'll select a DT @ 19. Between 2009-2014, 6 of 7 first round picks for the Jets were either a DT or DB ( 3 DTs, 2CBs and a S) It's obvious what Rex values. Given the current team needs and depth at the position, I would not be surprised to see the Bills go DT in the first
  5. Given his age, injury history and the depth at DL in the upcoming draft, I would guess it would be Kyle
  6. I know, sorry, I hoped to do so but can't figure it out on my iPhone Tried to fix it
  7. Idk that this thread is the place for this arguement but I keep seeing people saying the same thing. "Getting a true 2 gap NT will free up Dareus" I just don't think that is true. He will still, on many occasions, be asked to play with two gap responsibility.
  8. This is just as good of an excuse as someone who has torn an ACL. You could probably find questionable health issues about all players. Good kidney, good knee, etc. Idt there is any health concerns with Glenn than there would be with anyone else
  9. Great write up and o agree completely.
  10. In 2012 Nix was calling the shots, no? So I wonder how Whaley views him.
  11. Su'a Cravens is this. Round 3.
  12. With the transition tag, you risk the chance of losing Glenn if he's offered something they silly cannot match. Though that specifically wouldn't hurt them, the lost time when they could pursue a FA replacement does.
  13. Don't you see the tag as an opportunity to extend talks, driving both sides to make a long term deal. 5 of 6 tagged players last year reached long term deals after being tagged. The only exception was JPP
  14. I think this is right. He is a solid player at a position of importance. Even if he doesn't play under the tag, placing it on him to keep him off the market seems worth the risk to me.
  15. In a perfect world. I was speaking hypothetically as if they aren't able to get a deal done
  16. 13.5 million? A steep price, yet it must be done. Can't create another hole. The question is, should the tag be exclusive, non-exclusive or transitional? I think if they drop the tag it would be an exclusive rights franchise tag http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2016/2/16/10956324/nfl-free-agency-2016-franchise-tag-definition-value-candidates
  17. I would pay zero dollars and watch from home. Best seat in the house. I've heard the game is more suits than fans. I'd rather lock myself away and throw stuff at the TV
  18. Not to mention that TE if the most difficult position, other than QB, for college players to adjust to in the NFL. Look at all rookie TEs over the past few years. Even first round talent struggles. O'Leary was a late round pick who needs time to adjust and grow to be successful.
  19. Right. I know FA is over a month away but I can't help but be concerned. On the surface, the deal seems pretty straight forward.
×
×
  • Create New...