BillsFanNC

Well the useful idiots have been told, and they've in turn been dutifully telling us, that there's absolutely no evidence of wrongdoing by any of these characters. They'll never back off of that. So therefore it's the corrupt incoming Trump DOJ that has grand lawfare designs that only a preemptive pardon by Biden can thwart. There's simply no other choice. You know, for democracy. Iron Law of woke projection batting 1.000 for eternity.

I'm not saying that I batted 1.000 during election season, but I did go power alley a few times with some off the wall doubles. How does it feel to be batting 0 for 2024 Roundy?

I'd say this got the magic number down to single digits and then they tried to assassinate him twice and clinched it.

Landslide? 💯

Show trials ? That's what the prime time J6 hearings were Tibstain.

In the world where the uniparty exists.

🎯

I fully appreciate the OP and the thought process. But... I remember thoughts of the stars aligning for a dream season: After 51-3 and right up to wide right. After the greatest comeback in NFL history. After the 4th consecutive AFC championship and we're back America, deal with it. Right before homerun throw forward. Right before 13 seconds. It's that history that had me taking in the recent Cincy and KC home playoff losses with numb indifference. You need to get to the playoffs to have a shot. This team has done that and I've thoroughly enjoyed the ride thus far, but I refuse to be about anything other than enjoying the journey and the next game. But if you're into pointing at the stars aligning for a team then I'd look at how KC's season has played out thus far before the Bills.

This thread will always remain as a shining example of Finding's idiocy. A true PPP classic. Just beautiful. CBS, another reliable news outlet.... “I felt so ashamed that a news organization would place so many restrictions on an interview." Catherine Herridge reveals that a live interview with @elonmusk about the Twitter Files was quashed by CBS News because they didn't "know what he was going to say." "I was like, wait a second, isn't that what journalism is all about?" "I never went back to Elon Musk and said, I'm sorry, I know you're all about free speech, but they want to put these conditions on it. I just couldn't go back to him with that."

Justice Thomas sprung a killer question on the ACLU lawyer: "What remedy are you seeking?" Strangio, flummoxed by such a seemingly simple question said an injunction. Justice Thomas then asked "practically, you would get different treatment based on sex?" and the trap was laid. Strangio said the plaintiff (a girl who identifies as a boy) would be allowed to get drugs for "a typical male puberty" despite having a "birth sex [of] female." That answer made clear that girls who identify as boys would get a right under the Constitution to testosterone, but boys who identify as boys would not, which is...sex discrimination! Genius.

I liken the ignore function to unsubscribing from email lists. There are some people, companies etc. that I may have been interested in hearing from at one point, but no longer. They've become irrelevant. So you unsubscribe from their email list. It works somewhat but eventually a few always sneak through your spam filter. I can't remember if it was Billstime or Tibs, maybe both of them, that would argue that putting someone on an ignore list is violating their free speech. It's brilliant takes like that that land you on my ignore list in the first place. As if ignoring the BLM commie activist screech in the local town square is violating their 1st amendment rights.

Reliable Politico for Finding...

And that's precisely why the WH is considering granting them PREEMPTIVE PARDONS.

The @PeteHegseth nomination has been endangered entirely by anonymous sources. We have zero idea about the credibility of these sources since every single mud-slinger has remained (& been allowed to remain) unnamed. [Btw these same media refused to report on the Doug Emhoff accuser bc she was “anonymous” in the Daily Mail.] Meanwhile dozens of on the record character references have been offered (along with point by point disputes of the allegs) by Medal of Honor recipients, decorated war heroes, his Fox colleagues and those who worked w/Pete at his vets charities. How can a nomination as important as this be thwarted by entirely anonymous accusations? Where is the fairness/due process? The media ran with the clearly bogus rape charge story w/o offering virtually any of the exonerating facts. Now they ask us to believe them about these other character smears. Why should we? The infidelity - that’s admitted. Drinking upon his return from combat tours - that too. Nothing else here has been confirmed, verified, or substantiated with any evidence. The only fair Q for these Senators is: are a man’s prior marital troubles and a few nights seen drunk at bars years ago after returning from combat enough to sink a nomination? These are the only fair character Qs.