San-O

I'm warning you, be careful. The Kool-Aid drinkers don't like to be upset.

It's going to take more than some guy with bad teeth and a jobless guy in Alaska! Anyway, where are all the second day starters? Still waiting to hear back on that one. Also, I generally consider the source and am learning to stay clear of TD'd children. You know who you are. And oh, 26-38 is not an opinion, it is the Buffalo Bills record under Ole' Whitey's tenure. Really, I checked.

26-38. Put down the Kool-Aid.

Yeah, by all the Kool-Aid drinkers. See mirror. And where are all the 5th, 6th round Pro Bowlers? Hell, where are the 5th, 6th round starters? I just don't see them.

Does Reed make the roster?

We'll find out next year when the Bills go 8-8, finish 3rd in the division, and miss the playoffs again.

I don't know much about O-linemen, however there appears to be alot of people who believe Peters will develop into a starter. Why do people believe an undrafted fA will develop into probably the most difficult position on the O line?

Yeah, right. This team is BRIMMING with all kinds of 5'th and 6'th round ALL-PROs since TD has come here. He can barley even find starters after round 2.

26 - 38 See you next season, year SIX of the rebuilding plan.

Are you trying to make my point FOR me. I've been saying this for months now, and was getting killed by responses saying I don' t know what I'm talking about. Drafted starters. Quality drafted starters. How many of the Bills drafted starters would start for either NE or Pitt? "The Buffalo Bills are getting closer to the league's elite in terms of building through the draft. But the numbers suggest the Bills still need to increase their percentages of draftees on the roster. The Bills had 25 drafted players on the roster last year, and nine of those were starters. New England and Philadelphia each had 30 drafted players in the fold. Each of the league's Elite Eight - the eight that advanced to the divisional playoff round - had more home-grown starters. The Steelers and Colts each had 15 drafted starters. The Pats had 14 and the Eagles."

Time. 5 years, 7 years, 10 years. I'm getting old. The O-line still has issues. We are heading into the 5 year plan apparently. TOO much time, not enough results. Good night now.

Maybe when he was with Steelers. They ran him off. Haven't seen much in four years. What is the record in Buffalo?

Right. A rookie QB running for his life behind a bad O-line. Good, for who?

WR in the 2nd. Forget about OL help. Say hello to No left tackle, No center. 8-8 this year. Thanks TD.

All on my thread. Except these.

Jennings doesn't play for us anymore, so yes, one (1). You generally need five, or at least three or four.

Yeah, New England loves him!

True. Haven't had an offensive line for more like 10 years. You must be a proponent of the 10 year rebuilding plan.

This realization is coming about, oh, four years too late. Did I mention we are starting a rookie QB this year also with no LT? Yet.

Thank you. How many starting O-linemen did TD draft, Oh yeah ONE.

I thought "Ole' Whitey" was still the standard?

Exactly. I would also add that making the Bills starting roster has probably been a little bit easier than making the Pats roster over the four year period, seeing as they have won three Super Bowls and we have one season over .500, 9-7.

Sorry, I can't take anything seriously from someone who's name is synonymous with poopoo and has another mans picture as his avatar. Not that there's anything wrong with that!

Actually, I live about 5 minutes from RJ, he's in Laguna Beach. I'm 2 miles from the ocean and surfing tomorrow at 06:00 am.

You can't win without the horses. We simply don't have the horses, and virtually none of them are coming after the second round. Pick another team and see how many starters they drafted. Don't you think if TD drafted better in mid-rounds our O-line might not be the single biggest question mark every year, with this year not being an exception?